jablackburn wrote:2003-2006 is what it looks like. In 2007 it was re-designed and the engine choices were narrowed to the 3.2 6-cyl and the V8.

Oh wow, so from 2003-2006 they had the T-5, T-6 and V8?

I did notice a lot of T-6 for sale. I'll note to avoid those. Thanks again for everyone's help.

I'm interested in opinions as well. I was 'forced' to drive my 850 on ice this week and would like to have a set of chains/cables for the rare times I need them in the future. I was fortunate and did not have to use the chains I bought this week, but I did get a chance to talk to my Dealer before I...

Personally, I'd steer away from the V8, I can't ever imagine buying a huge car that eats that much gas for myself. In my opinion, if you want a fast car...um...don't get a big SUV. :mrgreen: I'm pretty open on the model right now, but I agree with you that for the purpose I would probably steer awa...

Thank you for all of your input, I really appreciate it. Based on MSN.com (though not the most reliable source) it looks like 2004 and 2005 had some "significant" engine problems and the 2003 had "moderate" steering and suspension problems. I heard the V-8 was made by Yamaha and ...

I have noticed that a lot of used XC90s (4-5 years old) been pricing very reasonably lately. I am considering getting an used one with reasonable miles (50-70K) as a ski and dog car. Because of this, AWD is a must. Are there any specific years or options I should be on the lookout for (or try to avo...

Hi, I am new to this forum. I currently have a 1996 Volvo 850 Turbo as my daily/beater that has been owned since new with 98,000 miles. I would rather take this car up to the snow vs. a weekend car or renting something (cause I'm just being cheap). I never got around to getting chains for the car si...