Login Register

98 v70: rant and want oil info Topic is solved

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
CIK7
Posts: 1564
Joined: 14 January 2019
Year and Model: 95 854T & V70trailer
Location: Antlers, Oklahoma
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 87 times

98 v70: rant and want oil info

Post by CIK7 »

I found a v70 base model with sunroof in Nautic Blue. I am focused on getting it and will say I'm pumped, but I'm disappointed its not manual. If its manual I dont care that its just N/A. Its the only v70 I can find right now. Im torn because id rather buy an auto T5 or 850 Turbo rather than an auto N/A, but i dont want responsibility for repairs on the turbo lines if and when that happens. Robert Spinner (RobertDIY, MVS rspi) makes removing the turbo look easy in his video. If the N/A had a manual, id wholeheartedly take it. Im going to get it regardless unless a p80 2.3t pops up.
Question: if the car has had synthetic most its life, can I switch it to conventional? Ive heard switching from conventional (after using most its life) to synthetic can blow some sort of seal. Cant remember what was said. But can that happen vice versa?
95 854 Turbo 258K, auto, current
09 Rav4 Ltd3.5Fwd, red, 208K, current
98 V GLE/SE red, 379k (277k), 5sp, trailer in progress...
05 CRV EX AWD, Navy, 170K/184k, sold
03 Accord 2dr V6 silver, 196K/214K, 6sp, t-boned, sold
98 S GT white, 175K, 5sp, sold
96 964 silver, 146K, diff&trans/engine self-destr, crushed 😭
98 XC black, 151K, flooded&bent rod, crushed
01 V Base white, 168k, traded for XC
09 Impala LT1 gray, 196K, sold for 01

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

Why would you want to use conventional oil on these engines...there is no point.

Use at least semi-synth...if you don't want fully synth.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
CIK7
Posts: 1564
Joined: 14 January 2019
Year and Model: 95 854T & V70trailer
Location: Antlers, Oklahoma
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Post by CIK7 »

misha wrote: 14 Apr 2021, 15:21 Why would you want to use conventional oil on these engines...there is no point.

Use at least semi-synth...if you don't want fully synth.
On my 96 960 (shares same whiteblock design) first owner always used conventional. So I made sure to use conventional. But its cheaper. Saves me $2 per jug. I have a jug of conventional unopened in closet
95 854 Turbo 258K, auto, current
09 Rav4 Ltd3.5Fwd, red, 208K, current
98 V GLE/SE red, 379k (277k), 5sp, trailer in progress...
05 CRV EX AWD, Navy, 170K/184k, sold
03 Accord 2dr V6 silver, 196K/214K, 6sp, t-boned, sold
98 S GT white, 175K, 5sp, sold
96 964 silver, 146K, diff&trans/engine self-destr, crushed 😭
98 XC black, 151K, flooded&bent rod, crushed
01 V Base white, 168k, traded for XC
09 Impala LT1 gray, 196K, sold for 01

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

You can use conventional oil,but you will need to change it more frequently....so consider that about how much you can save.

Oil and coolant are taking care about engine,and those are not really the items you would want to save on.

Semi-synth can go at least up to 10k km/1 year while conventional should be changed at 5-7k km/1 year whichever comes first.

Conventional oil will degrade faster than semi-synth or fully-synth...and it can't provide proper protection in various condition.

It's your car,your engine and your choice....and only you are deciding about what you will use.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

scot850
Posts: 14892
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1850 times
Been thanked: 1710 times

Post by scot850 »

I have run both and have even interchanged them due to what I had to hand. When synthetic oil came out many years ago there was a bunch of people claimed that synth oil caused seals to leak. But those where often on cars that were 10+ years old at the time and the oil seals were often not as good, heck, old British cars even used rope seals until the end of the 70's!

Modern seals are more durable and able to deal with the modern oils.

Pay your money and make a choice. Dino = more changes, synth = less changes, even using the so-called synthetic oil they sell us here in North America. They also do tend to keep the engine internals cleaner. Synthetic is also easier on the engine for cold starting, especially in winter temps.

As for the 4 speed auto V70NA. I had the 5 speed auto 2000 that I repaired and sold to my buddy. The 5 speed auto is often maligned as being a weak trans. It is just more complex and doesn't take to poor maintenance and no oil changes. Otherwise I like it in the NA over the 4 speed auto as it has quicker changes so keeps it in the power band better.

Either way the NA is a robust engine and the 20 valve is a solid motor and revs well. They can be modified to give more power.

If I just needed a car to run around town, I would use an NA as they warm up quicker and get way better mileage than a turbo.

Good luck whichever way you go.

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

User avatar
CIK7
Posts: 1564
Joined: 14 January 2019
Year and Model: 95 854T & V70trailer
Location: Antlers, Oklahoma
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Post by CIK7 »

scot850 wrote: 14 Apr 2021, 17:03 I have run both and have even interchanged them due to what I had to hand. When synthetic oil came out many years ago there was a bunch of people claimed that synth oil caused seals to leak. But those where often on cars that were 10+ years old at the time and the oil seals were often not as good, heck, old British cars even used rope seals until the end of the 70's!

Modern seals are more durable and able to deal with the modern oils.

Pay your money and make a choice. Dino = more changes, synth = less changes, even using the so-called synthetic oil they sell us here in North America. They also do tend to keep the engine internals cleaner. Synthetic is also easier on the engine for cold starting, especially in winter temps.

As for the 4 speed auto V70NA. I had the 5 speed auto 2000 that I repaired and sold to my buddy. The 5 speed auto is often maligned as being a weak trans. It is just more complex and doesn't take to poor maintenance and no oil changes. Otherwise I like it in the NA over the 4 speed auto as it has quicker changes so keeps it in the power band better.

Either way the NA is a robust engine and the 20 valve is a solid motor and revs well. They can be modified to give more power.

If I just needed a car to run around town, I would use an NA as they warm up quicker and get way better mileage than a turbo.

Good luck whichever way you go.

Neil.
Excellent feedback thank you.
95 854 Turbo 258K, auto, current
09 Rav4 Ltd3.5Fwd, red, 208K, current
98 V GLE/SE red, 379k (277k), 5sp, trailer in progress...
05 CRV EX AWD, Navy, 170K/184k, sold
03 Accord 2dr V6 silver, 196K/214K, 6sp, t-boned, sold
98 S GT white, 175K, 5sp, sold
96 964 silver, 146K, diff&trans/engine self-destr, crushed 😭
98 XC black, 151K, flooded&bent rod, crushed
01 V Base white, 168k, traded for XC
09 Impala LT1 gray, 196K, sold for 01

User avatar
Eddystone
Posts: 564
Joined: 20 January 2014
Year and Model: 1967 Ford GT40 Mk IV
Location: Lorain, Ohio
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 81 times

Post by Eddystone »

CIK7 wrote: 14 Apr 2021, 15:12 I found a v70 base model with sunroof in Nautic Blue. I am focused on getting it and will say I'm pumped, but I'm disappointed its not manual. If its manual I dont care that its just N/A. Its the only v70 I can find right now. Im torn because id rather buy an auto T5 or 850 Turbo rather than an auto N/A...
I have a 99 T5 Auto and a 98 N/A V70 Auto. The T5 is spirited little beast and is geared for a high speed, so it runs highway speeds at lower rpms. However, every time I drive the V70, I am impressed with what a wonderful little appliance it is. Very smooth, doesn't really feel that slow, and it just motors on. We roll. So much simpler than the 1999 fly by wire, somewhat artificially intelligent 2.3 liter turbo. Easier to both identify parts and buy parts for. There's real beauty and elegance in simplicity even when a car is not that much simpler.

Don't knock the little car. My V70 is the same Nautic Blue with sunroof and manual AC, if not trans.
1998 V70 Non-Turbo/Auto The Perfect Driving Appliance
1993 945 Turbo/Auto Pickemup Truck that Will Not Die. New 960 seats!
1999 S70 T5 Turbo/Auto which is better than Abscate's T5
All U.S. market models.
All running and on the road.
PM me if you are in Ohio. I'm in Lorain.

yanga001
Posts: 787
Joined: 24 March 2019
Year and Model: 98/99/00 v/s70’s
Location: Ontario
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by yanga001 »

Joining in with the nautic blue v70's. The smoothness of the transmission is something that a lot of modern cars have not matched as the focus is more on staying in the power-band. Case in point, test drove a highlander and the transmission seemed so confused when trying to accelerate. I am happier with the N/A for a daily driver, it had 280k Km's when we got it and its now roughly 315k Km's. I added an activated trip computer, cleaned it up a bit and have a bunch scheduled for it in the upcoming months.

It might not be the fastest thing in the world by any standard, however it is a much more enjoyable experience to drive compared to many modern cars. The only regret is having to recharge that AC every so often.
1998 S70 N/A Auto (Parts car)(planned to be harvested)
1998 V70 N/A Auto New full restoration project (Water pump thrown at 404K Km)
1998 V70 N/A Auto (Workhorse) (Tree to driver B pillar :( )
1999 S70 T5 Auto(Project) (planned to be fixed)
2000 S70 SE M Learning platform (planned to be driven one day)
2008 S60 2.5T Auto (Sold)
2012 Honda Pilot AWD Touring (Daily)

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35301
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1505 times
Been thanked: 3818 times

Post by abscate »

The 30 mpg of my two NA P80s, carefully cared for by previous owner, is addictive.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

SomeGuy537
Posts: 65
Joined: 18 November 2020
Year and Model: 1997 BMW 528i
Location: Mariehamn
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by SomeGuy537 »

abscate wrote: 16 Apr 2021, 04:07 The 30 mpg of my two NA P80s, carefully cared for by previous owner, is addictive.
They gotta be manuals both right? If you're getting 30 mpg with an auto i need to know your secret! :mrgreen:

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post