IPD sale XeMODeX - Experts in Volvo Electronics
Did you know? 🤔
Logged in users can get email notification of topic replies Log in or register (free).
Amazon Link Buy your stuff using this and it helps MVS!

AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on the Volvo S80 model. Sometimes called an "executive car", the S80 was and continues to be Volvo's top-of-the-line passenger car.
volvomadness
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:12 pm
Year and Model: v70 2003
Location: new york
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times
volvomadness

AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Post by volvomadness » Fri Aug 30, 2019 11:56 am

Have had numerous volvos over the years. 4 speed trans and the notorious AW55-50SN.

Does anyone no if the AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission which is a GM has the same failure rate as the Aisin (valve body etc)

Thanks Madness



User avatar
SuperHerman
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:28 pm
Year and Model: 2004 & 2016 XC90
Location: Minnesota
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 108 times
United States of America
SuperHerman

Re: AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Post by SuperHerman » Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:23 pm

The 4T65E is not a great transmission on Volvos. The AW55-50SN has a much better service history.

On the XC90 it is dreaded, but on the S80 FWD it appears to have a much better reputation.

The problem with the transmission is that it wears out too quickly due to design choices made for smoother shifting. Fortunately it is fairly easy to work on and most shops have no issues rebuilding them.

In the XC90 some have failed under 40k miles, but I have seen S80s going strong with over 200k miles.



User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 2955
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 2:30 pm
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 328 times
United States of America
RickHaleParker

Re: AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Post by RickHaleParker » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:16 pm

SuperHerman wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:23 pm
On the XC90 it is dreaded, but on the S80 FWD it appears to have a much better reputation.
You mean the S80 AWD?

2005 XC90 T6 AWD curb weight 4770 Lbs.
2005 S80 AWD curb weight 3633 lbs

The XC90 AWD is 1137 lbs or 31% heavier then the S80. The XC90 requires more work then the S80.
Collectively, trucks get worked harder then a car.


Platform: P80 1998 C70, B5234T3, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package, Plant: Uddevalla Sweden.

Platform: X40 (Nedcar) 2003 S40, B4204T3, AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000. Plant: Born Netherlands.

Platform P2 2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0, Plant Torslanda Sweden.
----------------------------------------------------------------
1997 S90, B6304S, AW30-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4 - Sold

User avatar
SuperHerman
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:28 pm
Year and Model: 2004 & 2016 XC90
Location: Minnesota
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 108 times
United States of America
SuperHerman

Re: AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Post by SuperHerman » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:33 pm

No I meant the FWD, even lighter than the AWD. I had a 2004 which I passed on to my sister. It was shifting great at 165k miles and counting until it hit a larger trailer. No issues with the transmission.

The XC90 was too heavy for the transmission and the soft shift design choice was amplified, with no way to compensate for clutch disc wear it has a tendency to be short lived. The S80 being lighter doesn't suffer as much.



User avatar
June
Posts: 1491
Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 11:18 am
Year and Model: 2004 S80 T6
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 115 times
United States of America
June

Re: AW42AWD / 4T65 Transmission

Post by June » Sun Sep 01, 2019 10:00 pm

The 4T65 suffered from adaptive software causing soft shifts for those who drive like a old lady. In reality, as a front wheel drive transmission in the S80 it's a excellent transmission. My 2004 in service date is 12/23/2003 and I regularly floor the accelerator even to this day. The first 12 years and 115K or so it ran with the factory fluid fill and it still looked sparkling clean when it got it's first service. It never shifted "soft" or had a shift flair or any trouble of any kind, and I assure you I gave it Hell!

I opted to replace it 4/2018 / 157K since it had to be removed to replace the engine rear main seal as it only added $3,800 for the new transmission which now is warrantied for life by Volvo. It just didn't make sense to reinstall a 14 year old transmission without refreshing the clutches and seals, but Volvo does not offer that service, just replacement of the unit as a whole. Otherwise I would have had a kit installed with torque converter.


The replacement has been in service for 30K without issue or "soft" shifts. I understand driving the 4T65 gently causes the software to lower the line pressure causing the "soft" shift condition. The transmission was not designed physically that way in a faulty manner. I imagine the AWD, adaptive software, and extra weight is responsible for the XC90 high failure rate. In the 1990s when the 4T65 was introduced for the supercharged 3800 none were AWD. When Volvo selected the 4T65 for the 1998 S80 it also was not AWD. So I'll bet the AWD is more responsible for the high failure rate than anything else. Volvo should have bumped up to the 4T80 without the AWD for the heavier XC90 T6.

I spent a good part of my adult life pre children as a secretary at a Buick dealer stubbing tickets for the service department. Both the 4T60 and 4T65 were quite reliable as a FWD transmission for Buick. From my experience with the 2002 and 2004 S80 T6 application it's just as good. No automatic lasts forever just as no clutch does in a manual equipped car. June


My Volvo cars owned
1989 740 GLT ordered
1994 850 4door standard shift ordered
1996 960 ordered
1998 S90 ordered totalled after 3 weeks
1998 V70 GT dealer stock car
2002 S80 T6 ordered totalled
2004 S80 T6 dealer stock car and current car owned

Post Reply