Login Register

98 s70 base manual 0-60; s70 vs 960 sedan opinion

Post Reply
User avatar
CIK7  
Posts: 1702
Joined: 14 Jan 2019, 08:15
Year and Model: 2026 Sportrailer GLT
Location: Antlers, Oklahoma
Has thanked: 350 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Post by CIK7 »

abscate wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 03:53 I thought the 1992-1998 all ran the same locking stuff, and 99 was the change over year to vin pinned stuff including keys and fobs programmed through VIDA
97 (for the US) was the last year that car owners could program their own remote. it's been a pain for me with my 98 xc because I decided not to buy into the dealer's fob price of $200-450.
06 Odyssey LX, silver, 127921, current
98 V GLE/SE red, 379k, 5sp, trailer in progress...
95 854 Turbo 258K, auto, sold
09 Rav4 Ltd3.5Fwd, red, 208k/213k, sold
05 CRV EX AWD, Navy, 170K/184k, sold
03 Accord 2dr V6 silver, 196K/232K, 6sp, t-boned, sold
98 S GT white, 175K, 5sp, sold
96 964 silver, 146K, diff&trans/engine self-destr, crushed 😭
98 XC black, 151K, flooded&bent rod, crushed
01 V Base white, 168k, traded for XC
09 Impala LT1 gray, 196K, sold for 01

User avatar
FLXC90
Posts: 1132
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 16:31
Year and Model: 98 V70 T5
Location: Florida Panhandle
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Post by FLXC90 »

I would go for whichever of the two is in better shape. The 98 S70 with N/A and stick would be the most reliable combo, and with the stick, you have more gears, and less weight than your AWD XCs, so the slight lower output won't be noticed in accelerating. The 97 GLT would be a straight across donor/recipient of parts from your XCs. Which ever needs less to be reliable.
Current Volvos:
1998 V70 T5, 112k sat 5 years, still in mechanical coma (finally at the top of the pile )
2004 XC90 T6 AWD: 186k, 60 on transaxle ( traded in )
1998 POS70 N/A: DD/training aid, 236k but really about 240k, I think...ABS module( passed on to son who sold it)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post