1995 854T, 259,997 miles
I am getting a code for catalytic converter efficiency and with this mileage and it once having bad valve seals, I'm not surprised it's shot. I don't have the $$ to fix it right now and want to just limp along for another few months / couple hundred miles.
My question is, does the rear O2 sensor make changes to the timing or fuel trim if it senses a bad catalytic converter?
I think I read somewhere that just the front O2 sensor controls all the engine management and that the rear O2 sensor simply looks for a change in the exhaust gases then trip the CEL if none is detected. However, I can't seem to find any information on whether the rear O2 sensor actually controls anything.
Thanks
Does rear O2 sensor change engine management?
- alschnertz
- Posts: 701
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 09:25
- Year and Model: 1995 854T
- Location: Connecticut
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
- erikv11
- Posts: 11912
- Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 14:03
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 817 times
You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.
One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
- alschnertz
- Posts: 701
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 09:25
- Year and Model: 1995 854T
- Location: Connecticut
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Ok, that's good.erikv11 wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 08:28 You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.
One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
I wonder if I got the rear sensor out of the exhaust stream (using an anti-fouler) the CEL would go out.
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
- misha
- Posts: 5437
- Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 16:09
- Year and Model: 2010 Volvo S80 D5
- Location: Serbia
- Has thanked: 155 times
- Been thanked: 432 times
Maybe it does not affect fuel trim on '95(M4.3 management)...but on my '97 with M4.4 it does.
Both o2 sensors are communicating with each other all the time and if rear one detects that something is wrong it will not just turn on CEL...it will also change fuel trim.
Both o2 sensors are communicating with each other all the time and if rear one detects that something is wrong it will not just turn on CEL...it will also change fuel trim.
2010 S80 D5 / restyling / fully equipped / Twin turbo / Savile Gray Metallic (492)
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
- kallekula
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 02 Mar 2014, 12:34
- Year and Model: S70 2000
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
Yes it will but chances are smog inspection will see that and fail the car. They have mirrors they look with.alschnertz wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 11:10Ok, that's good.erikv11 wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 08:28 You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.
One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
I wonder if I got the rear sensor out of the exhaust stream (using an anti-fouler) the CEL would go out.
BMW 540i 2002
S70 Base 2000
- alschnertz
- Posts: 701
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 09:25
- Year and Model: 1995 854T
- Location: Connecticut
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
^ Good point. But I suppose it would fail anyway because of the bad cat.
Just trying to buy some time and eliminate the annoyance of the CEL.
Just trying to buy some time and eliminate the annoyance of the CEL.
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
- erikv11
- Posts: 11912
- Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 14:03
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 817 times
260k, that's no slouch of a '95!
If you send me a m4.4 turbo ECU I'll flash it up for m4.4 with no rear O2 and send it back. They are cheap at junkyards. You can try out m4.4 too, it has subtle improvements. Still not free I know but still one easy way to get the light turned off. And my flashing just sits here doing nothing ...
Also keep in mind the rear O2 itself may be what's bad or there is an exhaust leak, cat could be fine.
If you send me a m4.4 turbo ECU I'll flash it up for m4.4 with no rear O2 and send it back. They are cheap at junkyards. You can try out m4.4 too, it has subtle improvements. Still not free I know but still one easy way to get the light turned off. And my flashing just sits here doing nothing ...
Also keep in mind the rear O2 itself may be what's bad or there is an exhaust leak, cat could be fine.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
- alschnertz
- Posts: 701
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 09:25
- Year and Model: 1995 854T
- Location: Connecticut
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
I'd say 260K isn't so bad either.
I swear this car has nine lives. One family owned (been a dd for 8 different family members!), has been threatened to be donated at least a half dozen times, but I can just never pull the trigger. I even posted just a few weeks ago wondering what I should pull before it goes away. Then don't you know, I have a breakdown with one of the other cars and have to pull this one from the weeds to use for the past week. Maybe I'll renew the registration in Sept. There's a ton of worn out wearable parts issues, but the sob will still just start up and go.
Photo is from 2 years ago when I was going to part it out. Still looks the same.
Thanks for the upgrade offer, but I'm fine with the way it is for now.
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE
- callahanoffroad
- Posts: 437
- Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 17:25
- Year and Model: 1995 850
- Location: St. Louis Missouri
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Up on the wood it looks like a Volvo statue or a trophy. I like it.alschnertz wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 14:04I'd say 260K isn't so bad either.
I swear this car has nine lives. One family owned (been a dd for 8 different family members!), has been threatened to be donated at least a half dozen times, but I can just never pull the trigger. I even posted just a few weeks ago wondering what I should pull before it goes away. Then don't you know, I have a breakdown with one of the other cars and have to pull this one from the weeds to use for the past week. Maybe I'll renew the registration in Sept. There's a ton of worn out wearable parts issues, but the sob will still just start up and go.
Photo is from 2 years ago when I was going to part it out. Still looks the same.
Thanks for the upgrade offer, but I'm fine with the way it is for now.
Author, Chef, and Shade Tree Mechanic
1995 Volvo 850, Non-Turbo, VVIS, LH FI, Green, 215,000 miles. B5254FS engine. Herman. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=84393
1996 Volvo 850, died at 280,000
Founder of: CookingForChemo.Org
Read my Silly Comic Book at: therealpizzabros.com/
1995 Volvo 850, Non-Turbo, VVIS, LH FI, Green, 215,000 miles. B5254FS engine. Herman. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=84393
1996 Volvo 850, died at 280,000
Founder of: CookingForChemo.Org
Read my Silly Comic Book at: therealpizzabros.com/
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 643 Views
-
Last post by caj767314922
-
- 4 Replies
- 351 Views
-
Last post by scot850
-
- 7 Replies
- 2505 Views
-
Last post by volvolugnut
-
- 4 Replies
- 484 Views
-
Last post by JimBee
-
- 5 Replies
- 992 Views
-
Last post by scot850






