Login Register

Should I bother

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2069
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 417 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Should I bother

Post by Sveedy »

I wasn't aware that compression test should be done at wot so I decided to do one again before tearing into the head gasket job today. # 1 cyl cold was 100; added a cap full of oil and it went up to 140. Now I'm beginning to think that I have a ring issue. If that's the case should I even bother doing the head gasket etc now or just wait till I can afford to do the rings etc. The car runs great - no smoking, just high crank case pressure. I've just been leaving the dip stick a little loose for now. I don't mind doing the head work, but if I'm still going to have the higher pressure then maybe it's a bit of wasted labor.

Thoughts ?
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

User avatar
kallekula
Posts: 1074
Joined: 2 March 2014
Year and Model: S70 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by kallekula »

Sveedy wrote: 08 Aug 2020, 11:18 I wasn't aware that compression test should be done at wot so I decided to do one again before tearing into the head gasket job today. # 1 cyl cold was 100; added a cap full of oil and it went up to 140. Now I'm beginning to think that I have a ring issue. If that's the case should I even bother doing the head gasket etc now or just wait till I can afford to do the rings etc. The car runs great - no smoking, just high crank case pressure. I've just been leaving the dip stick a little loose for now. I don't mind doing the head work, but if I'm still going to have the higher pressure then maybe it's a bit of wasted labor.

Thoughts ?
If you decide to do the rings you will have to take the head off again. Pistons are pushed upwards and out. Do it all at the same time and be done with it!
EDIT: I would suggest you take the head to a machine shop. They will skim it, regrind the valves, change valve stem seals etc. It costs a few hundred bucks but the head will basically be as good as new.

BMW 540i 2002
S70 Base 2000

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

If i remember correctly you said that engine use 1 quart/3k miles,that's 1l/5000km...that's nothing.
If there are no visible signs that engine use oil (blue smoke from exhaust on WOT or when you decelerate with engine)...i would leave it alone.
Upper limit for oil consumption is 1l/1000km.

What oil viscosity you use(this is important)?

You could have bad valve stem seals.
Even bad valve stem seals can get you into 1l/1000km of oil consumption since there are 20 of them.

You will need accurate gauge for compression test and it should be done correctly.

If that is my car i would leave it alone and switch to higher viscosity oil like 10w-40 high mileage.
That would cut oil consumption for 30-50% if you use xx-30 weight oil viscosity.

Mine used 1-1.5l/10.000km(between oil changes) from the factory depending on driving style(from max to min on oil dipstick).
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2069
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 417 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Post by Sveedy »

That's correct. 1 qt apx 3k miles. I use Mobil 1 High Millage 10-40 but I don't know what was used before. I've only had to do one oil change and that's when I started with the Mobil. I think the previous owner let things go being that she was 90.
I'm really just worried about the crankcase pressure. I already did the PCV system but I might upgrade it in order to get it to breath better.
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

Super granny with T5 :mrgreen:

Crankcase pressure...you can try with upgrade if that bothers you.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

scot850
Posts: 14864
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1834 times
Been thanked: 1709 times

Post by scot850 »

140 pressure reading is still low is it not?

Neil
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2069
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 417 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Post by Sveedy »

Yep. From what I've read it is. And I figure it's why I have too much crankcase pressure. So I'm hoping that if I can reduce the pressure I can then wait a bit before rebuilding the engine. It has 130k miles so I'd like to get a few more out of it.
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

scot850 wrote: 08 Aug 2020, 15:21 140 pressure reading is still low is it not?

Neil
It wouldn't run that good Neil.
My guess is that gauge is not reading properly or didn't seated properly.

Just found this:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/blog.fcpeu ... s_amp=true

Check compression on all cylinders to get complete picture.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2069
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 417 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Post by Sveedy »

I did test all cylinders before I realized that I should have wot when doing the test. Having wot increased the numbers a bit.
# 1 was the lowest, then # 2 ( apx 10lbs better ) and the rest the same at apx 150.

I'll check maker of gauge. I should be so lucky...
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2069
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 417 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Post by Sveedy »

Gauge is generic no name. I checked the o-ring and oiled it a little before test. Pressure builds fast in the first 2 or 3 cranks, then doesn't do much of anything for the remaining 5.

Thanks for all the input - I at least feel that I can wait a bit on rebuilding. For now.....
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post