Starting Issues 2008 XC90
-
jimmy57
- Posts: 6694
- Joined: 12 November 2010
- Year and Model: 2004 V70R GT, et al
- Location: Ponder Texas
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 320 times
Re: Starting Issues 2008 XC90
If you use a voltmeter to check voltage drop you can find THE cable or the one crimped lug on one end of the one cable that is causing the problem. The chance of it being the cable itself is very low. The + cable from rear runs inside the car and is protected in areas where it is underfoot. The greater vulnerability is cable being crushed by 2nd row seat but that would be a short to ground that would fry the battery. If you pierce the insulation on the + cable behind the fusebox and the other voltmeter lead on the stud in back of the fusebox where cables join and then probe stud to post on starter where that cable connects, you will likely find that one of those tests shows 2 volts indicating a big loss to some faulty connection. The fact you have a replaced starter means the vehicle had a bad starter (these starters have some history of bushings failing and internal armature drag with 250 A draw while it tries to turn engine) and it may have overheated one of those crimped lugs and it now is a resistive connection from the oxidized copper wire. These connections can usually be fixed using a mini torch and rosin core solder to solder that wire to the lug terminal. Follow that with heat shrink tape to cover that last couple of inches of cable insulation where the soldering requires it be removed to prevent it burning.
- Roger_850T
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 351
- Joined: 31 December 2013
- Year and Model: 854T 1995
- Location: Frederick MD
- Been thanked: 26 times
This is important - I had been presuming the positive cable, but this suggests the ground.stljrdnfan wrote: ↑05 Dec 2017, 13:45
I've never tried the positive only, but have gotten it to start running the ground only. But it still doesn't turn over full speed. Problem with a ground issue is that could be anywhere right? Not just on the cable from battery to front. so then the trick becomes finding it.
I would need to check, but I know sometimes the ground between the engine block and the body can corrode and get high resistance - that would explain your symptoms.
When you did your cranking tests (measuring at the post in the engine bay) - what did you use for a ground? Was it on the body or on the engine?
Roger
11 XC60 137k
08 V50 Project... Still in pieces
05 XC90 V8 213k
95 854T 350k Still my favorite daily driver
02 V70 186k+ Gave to my daughter, still going strong
03 S80 111k (crashed, but driver walked away unhurt)
93 945T 217k (gone to be parted out)
87 245 300k+ sold, still going afaik
84 264 Diesel, RIP at 160k
78 242 manual everything.
73 P1800ES, fun until the rust set in...
08 V50 Project... Still in pieces
05 XC90 V8 213k
95 854T 350k Still my favorite daily driver
02 V70 186k+ Gave to my daughter, still going strong
03 S80 111k (crashed, but driver walked away unhurt)
93 945T 217k (gone to be parted out)
87 245 300k+ sold, still going afaik
84 264 Diesel, RIP at 160k
78 242 manual everything.
73 P1800ES, fun until the rust set in...
- RickHaleParker
- Posts: 7129
- Joined: 25 May 2015
- Year and Model: See Signature below.
- Location: Kansas
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 958 times
This is important - I had been presuming the positive cable, but this suggests the ground.
I'm still leaning towards the positive cable because when he did the one wire self jump start on the ground side, it cranked but not very well. With a bad positive cable, doing a ground side jump would lower the over all resistance of the closed circuit loop, possibly enough to barley get it started.
I'm hoping he will do the one wire jump on the positive side because the test results would be pretty conclusive.
I'm still leaning towards the positive cable because when he did the one wire self jump start on the ground side, it cranked but not very well. With a bad positive cable, doing a ground side jump would lower the over all resistance of the closed circuit loop, possibly enough to barley get it started.
I'm hoping he will do the one wire jump on the positive side because the test results would be pretty conclusive.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
-
stljrdnfan
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 29 November 2017
- Year and Model: 2008 XC90
- Location: Salem AR
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Hey folks, thanks for all the input. I haven't been able to work on this for awhile now. But I plan on using the cable I made my jumper cables out of to make a replacement positive cable (the wire is free) and just run it around the outside of the car and see if that changes anything. If it does I'll just find a way to run it thought the vehicle and replace it permanently.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 804 Views
-
Last post by martyrl
-
- 2 Replies
- 1081 Views
-
Last post by Smith14333






