Login Register

Buyers Advice P2 vs P3

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
User avatar
Rattnalle
Posts: 1674
Joined: 1 September 2017
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Sweden
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Buyers Advice P2 vs P3

Post by Rattnalle »

Rear subframe bushings on early models wear out, but apart from that the chassis is much more solid.

In the south Swedish climate with wet and salty winters that used to turn Toyotas into brown dust in a few years the P3s still hold up well. Not as excessively well as P2s but on par with most other cars sold here.

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 798
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Post by pgill »

My advice.

If you like the P2 then buy the P2

If you like the P3 then buy the P3.

For me personally I own two EUCD vehicles (or if you prefer Volvo P3 Platform)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_EUCD_platform

I've owned the first since 2008 when bought it new and the second since 2018 when I bought it used.

Both Vehicles are the 3.2 liter six cylinder gasoline version.



If you are making the decision based on performance only then I will share some information that I posted on a different Volvo board.

Here is a link to a car and driver test for the V70 FWD 3.2
2008-volvo-v70-32-1 - Copy.pdf
(469.47 KiB) Downloaded 414 times

0 to 60 7.5 seconds (not really fast but not that slow)

60 to 100 12.0 seconds (reasonably fast)

5 to 60 7.7 seconds (faster than the T5)




By comparison here is the T5 with 247 HP
2001-volvo-v70-t5.pdf
(101.76 KiB) Downloaded 196 times

0 to 60 7.2 seconds

60 to 100 11.6 seconds

5 to 60 7.9 seconds (rolling start is slower than 3.2)

If you search the forum you will find that the T5 owners feel that their car is significantly faster than the 3.2

The numbers tell otherwise

I think the real take away is that Volvo made the torque curve on the 3.2 very flat and that makes the 3.2 feel slower than it is.


If you want to know what needs to be looked after to keep it going well above 100,000 miles

http://www.freel2.com/forum/topic32504.html

And if you are handy the cost is not significant.

I paid just over $500 in parts to complete nearly all of the items on the list for my used 2010 S80 3.2 with 123,000 miles on it


For me the P3 is the safest car that you can buy and maintain for ~10 years and about $10,000.

And because I own two P3's I am building a small inventory of parts just in case I have an unexpected failure.

Here is a nice thread bout a P3 that went >300K miles and what the owner did the keep it going

https://forums.swedespeed.com/showthrea ... 3-2-Thread

If I get to 300K miles I may need to replace the timing chain and tensioner.


Hopefully this is helpful to someone


Remember: Get the one you like, you will take better care of it

Have fun

Paul
Last edited by pgill on 14 Mar 2019, 20:07, edited 3 times in total.

Marcobrick
Posts: 333
Joined: 28 September 2010
Year and Model: 2003 V70T5
Location: Christchurch,New Zealand
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Marcobrick »

In New Zealand you can get the 2008+ V70 with a 5cyl turbo. They come in as second hand imports from Japan. Very tempting, love the interior and exterior styling particularly around the rear. (Don’t read too much into that statement!)
The Fleet:
2008 XC90 D5
2014 Nissan Leaf
1973 Fiat 125
1970 MGB GT
1973 Land Rover Series 3 flat deck.
Previously:
2003 V70T5
1996 850R sedan
1994 850T5 Sedan
1995 850 Turbo Wagon
1998 V70T5

Favourite line: "How hard can it be?"

MacNoob
Posts: 39
Joined: 26 March 2011
Year and Model: 2007 XC70
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by MacNoob »

I do like that model. Lots of the P3 XC70s around here, very few V70s although I do see them on occasion.

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14460
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2650 times
Been thanked: 1240 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

I’ve seen only two or three P3 V70s ever.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

natural4reelz
Posts: 75
Joined: 6 November 2018
Year and Model: 02 VOLVO S60 TURBO 5
Location: LAS VEGAS, NV
Has thanked: 3 times

Post by natural4reelz »

Im new to VOLVO...
I have the 2002 VOLVO S60 2.4 TURBO/ AWD

WHAT do you mean you should avoid 2001/2002 P2

Geeez....😦

Hope its not that bad..••••

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35267
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1497 times
Been thanked: 3809 times

Post by abscate »

The 2001 and 2002 had problematic software in the transmissions about 10% of the time - if yours is running well, ignore this advice. You also get the first generation MM Electronics throttle body (ETM or ETB) which lasts about 150-200k miles.

The bias here against these models come from the poor folks who come here gleefully having bought a $500 luxury car and then finding they need $2000 in repairs.Lashing out at the year and model is a better emotional defense than admitting you got taken.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
Rattnalle
Posts: 1674
Joined: 1 September 2017
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Sweden
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Rattnalle »

abscate wrote: 16 Mar 2019, 13:49 The 2001 and 2002 had problematic software in the transmissions about 10% of the time - if yours is running well, ignore this advice. You also get the first generation MM Electronics throttle body (ETM or ETB) which lasts about 150-200k miles.

The bias here against these models come from the poor folks who come here gleefully having bought a $500 luxury car and then finding they need $2000 in repairs.Lashing out at the year and model is a better emotional defense than admitting you got taken.
Later models do have fewer model specific standard fault though. Not that early ones always have them. As with most cars as these are ironed out year to year.

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14460
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2650 times
Been thanked: 1240 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

abscate wrote: 16 Mar 2019, 13:49Lashing out at the year and model is a better emotional defense than admitting you got taken.
Brutal, but true.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

cn90
Posts: 8249
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Post by cn90 »

Old post but I trust this "P2 crowd" so to speak...

Just in case I need a newer Volvo such as P3, I have read this thread and advices by "JRL" on the first page.
But I want to avoid the Ford 3.2 engine if possible.

So, for V70 it looks like 2013.5 ---> 2016 seems like a good year to buy?
I just need something reliable (engine and trans) and easy to maintain.
Will look at vehicle with < 100K miles...
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post