Login Register

Do I have 140hp or 170hp from the factory?

Post Reply
User avatar
gnalan
Posts: 968
Joined: 21 Jul 2020, 13:39
Year and Model: 2001 S60
Location: Ohio
Has thanked: 557 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post by gnalan »

Is there a way to tell which version of the factory setups I have? I don't know if it's the 140hp setup or the 170hp setup. I know the only difference, as far as I know, is the factory programming. It's a 2001 S60 with the B5244S naturally aspirated engine.

I'm more curious than anything. I would assume the 140hp setup would run fairly decent on 87 octane instead of the more expensive 91 octane, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
2001 S60, B5244S, AW55-50SN, FWD (Sold)
Cancer/Illness/Caregiver Support Thread

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7197
Joined: 25 May 2015, 14:30
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

B5244S 2.4 = 140 hp.
B5244S 2.4i = 170 hp.
Active
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2017 Ford PIU. 3.5l, Twin Turbo, 365 Hp.
............................
Past
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000. ( Killed by a plastic radiator. )
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion ( I moved, the project did not )
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0. ( Transmission dead after sitting for a winter )

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013, 06:20
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

In North America the 2.4 na had 168hp. European markets have a different 'marketing' when it comes to engine size and power, so Volvo sold them the exact same engine but with an ECU mod that cut the hp down to 140hp on the base model - they could still get the 168hp model for extra money. They also had a weird 2.0T (a very good engine otherwise). And lucky them, they got the great D5 turbo diesel engine with 163hp and with 251lb⋅ft

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 36147
Joined: 17 Feb 2013, 17:54
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1610 times
Been thanked: 4065 times

Post by abscate »

oragex wrote: 06 Oct 2020, 07:37 In North America the 2.4 na had 168hp. European markets have a different 'marketing' when it comes to engine size and power, so Volvo sold them the exact same engine but with an ECU mod that cut the hp down to 140hp on the base model - they could still get the 168hp model for extra money. They also had a weird 2.0T (a very good engine otherwise). And lucky them, they got the great D5 turbo diesel engine with 163hp and with 251lb⋅ft
If I trade in my ECU for the lower powered one will VOlvo give me the price delta back??

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013, 06:20
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

Looking at how they skim money on repairs, I have the vague impression they would be slightly hesitant

User avatar
gnalan
Posts: 968
Joined: 21 Jul 2020, 13:39
Year and Model: 2001 S60
Location: Ohio
Has thanked: 557 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post by gnalan »

A 2.0T 5 cylinder? That would be awesome to have. A faster revving engine, and higher rpm limit, plus the head would flow amazingly well and only have to fill 400cc.

The diesel option would be nice too. Diesel fuel is a lot cheaper than what 91 octane gasoline is, and with the higher fuel mileage that would make it even cheaper in comparison to gasoline.
2001 S60, B5244S, AW55-50SN, FWD (Sold)
Cancer/Illness/Caregiver Support Thread

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post