I have a 2002 V70 XC with 170k miles on it. Recently had an alternator diode (presumably) go bad, leading to odd electronics behavior and no charging. Bought a new replacement alternator, installed it, went ok, car now running apparently pretty well for a few days, all voltages and behavior check out.
During install, I noticed a difference in the pulleys but didn't think too much about it. Then I started to google.
So, turns out I've installed an alternator with a solid pulley. The one that came out has a decoupler pulley on it. I was not previously aware of the difference. The decoupler on the old one is frozen solid, i.e. it's behaving like a solid pulley, old alternator rotor turns freely but the pulley and rotor are 100% bound together, no play between them in either direction.
I'm reading all kinds of scare stories about replacing a decoupler pulley alternator with a solid pulley alternator—it's going to destroy the bearings in the other units on your belt path, it's going to throw belts every 10 minutes, kill your tensioners at an alarming rate, harm your crankshaft, etc.
My question for the group: True? Does the solid pulley matter in a significant way? If I hadn't been running with an effectively solid pulley for who-knows-how-long (at 165k, alternator was original, and apparently decoupler pulleys are only expected to last 50-60k?) I'd be pulling this alternator and installing a decoupler pulley on it. But the car seems to be running fine, and I presume I've been driving with a seized pulley for at least tens of thousands of miles (daily driver).
Does any of this matter? I do tend to replace my serpentine belt about every 30-40k, though tensioner only once in the life of the car so far. Point being: should I break it all down, pull the alternator, and replace the solid alternator pulley with a decoupler pulley, or should I just forget about it and move on seeing as how the car seems to be running happily?
Opinions and rationales?






