Login Register

850 Est 2.0L 20V 1996 Engine Management info needed.

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
Ricky_devon
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 December 2009
Year and Model: 850 2L 20v est, 1996
Location: Devon; UK

850 Est 2.0L 20V 1996 Engine Management info needed.

Post by Ricky_devon »

Hi all,

I continue to have problems with my car engine managment system.
Just pre christmas, it started to play up, intially replacing the battery seemed to solve it, but soon the faults returned. I am not going to go into detail of the 'story' so far as it is too long! I have got to the point that having had the dianostics plugged into several times, codes read & cleared, replaced the Lambda sensor - which has improved things - and the MAF sensor - which is still questionable - may have a dud one. I need to know what voltages should be at the 4 connection points at the MAF sensor, so I can determine if I have a faulty ECU or MAF sensor. Does anyone have this info, or an idea where I can find out?

Thanks. :shock:

Ozark Lee
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14798
Joined: 7 September 2006
Year and Model: Many Volvos
Location: USA Midwest
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by Ozark Lee »

What were the code numbers when you had the car scanned?

...Lee
'94 850 N/A 5 speed
'96 Platinum Edition Turbo
Previous:
1999 V70XC - Nautic Blue - Totaled while parked.
1999 V70XC - RIP - Wrecked Parts Car.
1998 S70 T5
1996 850 N/A
1989 740 GLT
1986 740 GLT
1972 142 Grand Luxe

Ricky_devon
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 December 2009
Year and Model: 850 2L 20v est, 1996
Location: Devon; UK

Post by Ricky_devon »

Hi Lee,

Hopefully will see the mechanic dealing with later today & find out.

Ricky

Ozark Lee
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14798
Joined: 7 September 2006
Year and Model: Many Volvos
Location: USA Midwest
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by Ozark Lee »

While you are at the shop with a scan / reset tool have them just unplug the MAF sensor and see how it behaves. It will set another code but if the idle smooths out then your replacement MAF sensor is likely bad. The plus in doing that test there is you are at the shop and the code that unplugging it will set can be cleared on the spot.

...Lee
'94 850 N/A 5 speed
'96 Platinum Edition Turbo
Previous:
1999 V70XC - Nautic Blue - Totaled while parked.
1999 V70XC - RIP - Wrecked Parts Car.
1998 S70 T5
1996 850 N/A
1989 740 GLT
1986 740 GLT
1972 142 Grand Luxe

Ricky_devon
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 December 2009
Year and Model: 850 2L 20v est, 1996
Location: Devon; UK

Post by Ricky_devon »

Hi Lee and all,

Unfortuantely I missed the guy at his workshop today - he was out attending a breakdown, I've already left the car with him since it was virtually undrivible - I'd only go with it with someone else following to tow if needed, although it make to his place unaided! So keys locked in his garage, I have since spoken to him on the phone.

Although it has the newer type of diagnostic socket - in the car under the coin tray, I'm quite surprised to learn that it still gives the same format of codes as the older system with the flashing diodes in the engine bay.

When he first plugged in, all sorts of codes came up, I can't remember them all, but included on the list was lambda sensor, loom faults, maf sensor, low fuel pressure. Clearing the codes resulted in the lambda code coming back first every time, so while wondering if infact it is a faulty ecu as so many parts can't have failed all at once, he replaced the lambda sensor. After this, and clearing codes again, all codes stopped except MAF sensor code. The code comes back after every clear down. I had replaced the MAF sensor, before the codes were read, after advice from a 3rd party, however it is a non OEM from ebay, so is not beyond question that the new one maybe a dud.

The code given is 121.
According to the UK Autodata book, this translates as MAF sensor/loom fault. System type = Bosche Jetronic LH 3.2.

Engine model (read from the cam belt cover) = B5204S.

So, if we could find out what the voltage at each one of the MAF Sensor connector (4 pin) should be, we could isolate whether;
1- correct signal coming from ecu?
2- correct feed being returned from the MAF sensor?
Also - is one a earth/ground?
Therefore; if it is the MAF sensor, or a loom/ecu fault.
The guy has a pin autodata manual, but it only goes back as far as version T, not S as mine is, and of course he can't be sure if a change was made between the two different types. :(

The only other thing to note is that having read so many posts, compared to others, it would seem unusal that my temp guage rarely makes it above 1/4 on the scale - except very hot weather/stationary traffic, occasionally the gauge fails to read. This is not a recent development though, been like this since I've had the car. Faulty coolant sensor??

Hope that someone can advise.

Ricky.

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

The only other thing to note is that having read so many posts, compared to others, it would seem unusal that my temp guage rarely makes it above 1/4 on the scale - except very hot weather/stationary traffic, occasionally the gauge fails to read. This is not a recent development though, been like this since I've had the car. Faulty coolant sensor??
Bad thermostat. They tend to take the coolant sensor with them, so replace that as well.

That said, I don't know what numbers the MAF is supposed to be reading (I'm not sure it will read anything by itself totally unplugged so I'm not sure there's a way to test it), especially on that engine, but if it runs better with it unplugged, then it is very likely that the new one is bad. For the pin layouts, I would think 1 is power, 1 is ground, and the other 2 output some kind of voltage feedback to the ECU computer. The cars are particularly picky if you use an aftermarket brand sensor on them.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

However, here is a table of the voltages you should be getting at the ECU itself. Look at the voltages at A13 on your model (this ECU configuration is MUCH different than my S70's, as are the voltages from said sensor - wow!)

Looking at this, it looks like maybe unless you buy the MAF specificially made for your car, it may be putting out much lower voltages (as for the other 850 models) that your car doesn't know what to do with. According to this, you'll be seeing between 2.9-3.6V, instead of the .9 or something my S70 should be relaying back to the computer.

I hope I got the right engine here.
Attachments
B5204FS.pdf
(41.03 KiB) Downloaded 172 times
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

Ricky_devon
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 December 2009
Year and Model: 850 2L 20v est, 1996
Location: Devon; UK

Post by Ricky_devon »

Hi,

Thanks for the ecu voltage table, we should be able to use this.

Ricky.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post