Login Register

Decisions deccisions S60 R?

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
deviantwagon
Posts: 15
Joined: 15 February 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 XC SE AWD
Location: Thanksgiving Point, Utah

Decisions deccisions S60 R?

Post by deviantwagon »

Here it is. I have the rare opportunity to get a garage queen for weekend use only. I have found two that are in my range. I currently own a Volvo XC70 SE AWD turbo and love it as the family car... as well it performs great for a wagon! I have owned vettes in the past so there is a piece of my heart in American Muscle. The two choices before me:

2002 Pontiac Firebird/Trans Am, LS1 V8, 6 speed 46K miles ( last year for the TA...ever!)
or
2004 Volvo S60 R, auto, 68K miles (one owner, clean title, history...nice car)

HELP! all you SR owners out there. How long do they really last. A few simple mods and the R should keep up with no problem?

Thanks,

Mark

JRL
Posts: 9350
Joined: 22 November 2005
Year and Model: Several
Location: 19333
Been thanked: 16 times

Post by JRL »

Longer than that POS Firefird will last, I will guarantee you that and besides,
you like rattles?
Firebirds (and Camaro) were one of the worst made cars ever, it will rattle you (and it) to death
Mod note. Jim passed away in early 2022, his contributions to this forum are immortal, and he is missed. RIP

2000 V70R Black, 144,000 miles Wife's R.
2007 V70 2.5T White/Oak 111,000 MILES. Polestar tune, IPD bars, rear spoiler, dark grey Thors, DWS 06, HU850, sub.

FCPEURO
Posts: 3002
Joined: 17 June 2009
Year and Model: 2006 XC90 V8
Location: Milford, CT
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by FCPEURO »

I have a 2004 S60R and it is the funnest car I have ever had. I have an autotech/elevate tune and a 3" DP sitting on the floor waiting to be installed.

As long as you take care of the car, she will not let you down. I drive mine hard and she loves every minute of it.

Georgeandkira
Posts: 882
Joined: 7 April 2009
Year and Model: '07 V70 + '15 XC70
Location: Hudson & Champlain Valleys, USA
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Post by Georgeandkira »

Hello deviant, Go for the Volvo. The last year for the Trans Am is nothing more than a footnote. You'd be better off with Rockford's 1975 gold Firebird-it would generate happy conversation. The truely ugly American car industry did nothing but spit window dressing in our faces-and I swear, it pains me to be able to say that. American muscel cars have a beautifully styled history which ended in the early '70s. Resuscitated muscel car name plates are embarrassments. They make their owners look like indiscriminating consumers. The Sponge Bob generation can enjoy the new Camaro, but doesn't a grey haired guy look foolish in the "new Thunderbird"? It also pains me to think how Volvo (and Saab) abandoned their value conscious customers-but that's another story. An '02 Trans Am is only good for a NAPA calendar photo. Kira

jda2000
Posts: 584
Joined: 1 April 2010
Year and Model: 04 V70 2.5T 01 V70T5
Location: Sarasota, FL

Post by jda2000 »

just to be a contrarian, buy american and go for the Trans AM

deviantwagon
Posts: 15
Joined: 15 February 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 XC SE AWD
Location: Thanksgiving Point, Utah

Post by deviantwagon »

Thanks for the replies! I really do like them both and knew that posting such a question on a Volvo forum would give me SLIGHTLY biased opinions! A 1980 Volvo 240 DL four speed manual was my first car, handed down from my father. If a 16 year old boy can't kill a car then it is a Beast for sure and I loved that brick! The S60 R (the 2004 in particular) from what I have read on that 'other forum' is not the most reliable. They did say the GT (automatic) is better. I have bought lots of cars so I know the basic, generic stuff to look for; what S60 R type stuff should I beware? recalls?

Japedo
Posts: 449
Joined: 11 July 2008
Year and Model:
Location: NB Canada

Post by Japedo »

Well I have had my mind made up for a couple years tht my next car is going to be a s60R, so IM saying buy the S60.

But people are being a bit hard on the firebird, it is a fun car. Just not in the same catergory as the S60.

If your rockin a mullet, and like burning rubber while cranking the ac-dc tunes!!!! Go fire bird!

I guess the S60 would be good for the same thing, lol just slip under the radar a little better.

My friend has a 79 firebird, 400 cubic inch engine 530HP naturally aspirated four wheel disc brakes etc.... Its beautiful...... BUt I am not a fan of the new ones either.

Id say the s60 would be funner to drive and easier on fuel.. safer, handle better, better resale cheaper insurance just to name a few, I can't wait to get one!

Good luck with either ride!
2003 v70 2.5tawd black/black 120miles
2007 nissan altima 2.5 cvt 107miles
2001 xc70 211 miles " collision"/ parts car
1994 850 turbo 315miles 5 speed "stoped fixing it"

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

Ever driven a Saab Viggen? The things are little rockets, they put my 240 hp T5 to shame :mrgreen:

I wasn't terribly impressed with the S60R's acceleration (they are HEAVY), but man, they can corner. It's more of a car you can drive every day and not just take out on weekends. And Volvo build quality/reliability is still far better than any GM car...and yes, I/we've owned a few.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post