My 98 S70 (133k) had new front pads and rotors at 106k 2 1/2 yrs ago. I really don't check brakes often but I noticed the rotors look like the pads had a wire comb on them making many circular grooves in the rotors. Outside and inside of the fronts. What's happening here?
Brad98s70
Front rotors?
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Road crap (gravel, sand, etc) gets caught in between the pads and rotors and digs into the rotors.
It's not pretty, but as long as the rotors aren't shaking or you don't feel like braking function is reduced or whatever, it's really nothing to worry too much about.
It's not pretty, but as long as the rotors aren't shaking or you don't feel like braking function is reduced or whatever, it's really nothing to worry too much about.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
-
fazool
- Posts: 746
- Joined: 6 February 2010
- Year and Model: S60, 2007
- Location: buffalo, NY
- Been thanked: 7 times
Rotors will often look ugly. The bare and exposed metal has no protection and it rusts FAST. After a rain, my rotors always get orange with surface rust. A couple miles of driving and they are shiny again.
Scratches and score marks aren't too worrisome. If they are really excessive you will lose surface area for braking contact.
Once that comb shape is there, however, it will take a while to remove it. Imagine one single groove caused by a stone or something (as explained above). This will make a groove in the rotor. As the brake wears down on the rotor, the rotor will polish itself down a little. BUT, the pad will conform to fit into this groove and mate somewhat to this shape. Instead of just rubbing on the flat part of the rotor, it will rub on the flat part AND inside the groove deepening the groove as it goes.
If you took the rotor off the car and turned it on a lathe, you would cut/wear down the flat surface until the groove is gone. On the car, however, the brake pads wear down the flat surface and the groove at the same time.
In the first picture is a typical grooved rotor with pad materiual in purple. The second is what you would THINK will happen when the brake works for a while, but the third pic is (an exageration of) what really happens.
Scratches and score marks aren't too worrisome. If they are really excessive you will lose surface area for braking contact.
Once that comb shape is there, however, it will take a while to remove it. Imagine one single groove caused by a stone or something (as explained above). This will make a groove in the rotor. As the brake wears down on the rotor, the rotor will polish itself down a little. BUT, the pad will conform to fit into this groove and mate somewhat to this shape. Instead of just rubbing on the flat part of the rotor, it will rub on the flat part AND inside the groove deepening the groove as it goes.
If you took the rotor off the car and turned it on a lathe, you would cut/wear down the flat surface until the groove is gone. On the car, however, the brake pads wear down the flat surface and the groove at the same time.
In the first picture is a typical grooved rotor with pad materiual in purple. The second is what you would THINK will happen when the brake works for a while, but the third pic is (an exageration of) what really happens.
- Attachments
-
- groove.jpg (17.25 KiB) Viewed 885 times
2007 S60 2.5T AWD (Daily Driver)
2001 S60 2.4T (Daughter's Car)
2003 S80 2.9 (Son's Car)
1995 850 2.4 (Daughter's Car - sold off)
2005 S40 2.4i (Bought new - since sold)
1986 740GLE 2.3(First Volvo - sold off)
Thanks for your replies.. This is possible on both front rotors, both sides inside and out? Rear show normal flat wear. I'm not looking for a problem if there isn't one but seems pretty weird to have matching grooves on both sides...
-
fazool
- Posts: 746
- Joined: 6 February 2010
- Year and Model: S60, 2007
- Location: buffalo, NY
- Been thanked: 7 times
Well it depends how symetrical they are. Most of a vehicles stopping power is in the front wheels so front brakes are always balanced to do more work. Therefore you can't compare front to rear.
Some manufacturer's brake pads include wear indicators, which are basically soft rivets down in the materal (in a hole) that will start to squeal/ring when the pad gets low (so you audibly know the pad is low). Grooves made from these are exactly located and there is usually two of them (2 rivets) on each side of the rotor.
I have, however, in all my years, never had Volvo pads with those rivets in them, I don't think thats whats going on there.
When you look at the side of the pad, can you see pad material? You should be able to see how much pad is left without even removing the tires.
If there is sufficient pad material (> 5/16") you should be fine and its just grit and debris.
The propblem is that these pads minimally retract and debris can get in there and get held in place.
If you can takle a close up picture showing the edge of the brake pad and the rotor surface and post it here, we can help more
Some manufacturer's brake pads include wear indicators, which are basically soft rivets down in the materal (in a hole) that will start to squeal/ring when the pad gets low (so you audibly know the pad is low). Grooves made from these are exactly located and there is usually two of them (2 rivets) on each side of the rotor.
I have, however, in all my years, never had Volvo pads with those rivets in them, I don't think thats whats going on there.
When you look at the side of the pad, can you see pad material? You should be able to see how much pad is left without even removing the tires.
If there is sufficient pad material (> 5/16") you should be fine and its just grit and debris.
The propblem is that these pads minimally retract and debris can get in there and get held in place.
If you can takle a close up picture showing the edge of the brake pad and the rotor surface and post it here, we can help more
2007 S60 2.5T AWD (Daily Driver)
2001 S60 2.4T (Daughter's Car)
2003 S80 2.9 (Son's Car)
1995 850 2.4 (Daughter's Car - sold off)
2005 S40 2.4i (Bought new - since sold)
1986 740GLE 2.3(First Volvo - sold off)
Thanks Fazool for the reply, I will get some pictures and post. I looked, but to my untrained eye, it looks like there's a good amount of meat left on the pads. But one more thing only because I find this really interesting. According to your diagram my rotors will continue to wear deeper into the grooves because the calipers will keep pressure on the pads on those points. Do I have that right? Also if I take the pads out, they will be grooved also to match the grooves on the rotors?
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
I doubt that the grooves will get deeper, they just won't get corrected under normal use.
I turn the rotors if the grooves get bad and there is enough meat on the rotor. Like jablackburn said they still stop well when grooved, even with new pads. But will stop better with a flat rotor surface (pads will wear smooth on a freshly turned rotor).
I turn the rotors if the grooves get bad and there is enough meat on the rotor. Like jablackburn said they still stop well when grooved, even with new pads. But will stop better with a flat rotor surface (pads will wear smooth on a freshly turned rotor).
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
-
vjaneczko
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: 27 March 2006
- Year and Model: 2006 S60R
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Been thanked: 6 times
If you can afford the upgrade, I've been using Zimmerman cross drilled rotors and Akebono pads for two years and the rotors are still baby-butt smooth.
"He attacked everything in life with a mix of extraordinary genius and naive incompetence, and it was often difficult to tell which was which." - Douglas Adams
1997 855 GLT - R.I.P.
2006 S60R - For ME!
1997 855 GLT - R.I.P.
2006 S60R - For ME!
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
I have the same combination, but I've warped mine 2 years/40,000 miles later. 
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post






