99 S70 T5 Why are the rear disks bigger than the fronts?
-
c70_lindsay
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 2 April 2011
- Year and Model: 99 S70 T5.
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
99 S70 T5 Why are the rear disks bigger than the fronts?
I recently bought a 99 S70 t5, to replace my dearly beloved C70. I was changing the winter tires over to summers yesterday and noticed that the rear disks are actually bigger then the fronts!! What the hell that makes no sense. I didn't actually measure them, and they all look stock. Could someone please shed some light on this~ Thanks, Tim
-
difflock54
- Posts: 471
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Year and Model: V40 Nordic 2002
- Location: Wellington. New Zealand.
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Are you referring to the outside diameter of the disk or the width of the rotor unit itself?
The rear rotors have an e-brake drum incorporated as implied above.
The rear rotors have an e-brake drum incorporated as implied above.
-
c70_lindsay
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 2 April 2011
- Year and Model: 99 S70 T5.
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
Ummmm ya, I am talking about the outside diameter of the rear break disks. I'm not a moron. I am well aware the e-brake drum.
- BEJinFbk
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 5 January 2008
- Year and Model: '98 V70 R
- Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 146 times
So, what's not obvious here?
Front has a hub, rear has a hub and E brake.
Am I missing something in your question?
Front has a hub, rear has a hub and E brake.
Am I missing something in your question?
'98 V70 R - Well Equipped for Life Up North... 
-
difflock54
- Posts: 471
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Year and Model: V40 Nordic 2002
- Location: Wellington. New Zealand.
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
No one impied that you were a 'moron'.
Your question is not actually that specifically clear as you merely say bigger.
Other member responses posted also indicate uncertainty about the direction of your question.
Your question is not actually that specifically clear as you merely say bigger.
Other member responses posted also indicate uncertainty about the direction of your question.
-
precopster
- Posts: 7543
- Joined: 21 August 2010
- Year and Model: Lots
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
Do the rear brakes have the small DB2 pads like these: http://www.sunburybrakes.com.au/prod1702.htm
If not they're definitely NOT standard though if anyone is intent enough to run a tiny pad on larger discs it COULD be done.
If not they're definitely NOT standard though if anyone is intent enough to run a tiny pad on larger discs it COULD be done.
Current cars VW Transporter 2.5TDI, 2010 XC90 D5 R Design
-
wjhandy850
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 12 October 2009
- Year and Model: 854 GLT 1997
- Location: Ga
May this be the case because the way the brake system is designed to prevent the nose dive on hard braking. It was a horrible problem with the heavier cars of the of the past.
-
j-dawg
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 20 April 2013
- Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
dive and weight transfer on braking are actually a function of deceleration, center of gravity, and suspension geometry, not of front/rear brake balance. biasing brakes towards the rear is a no-no - you end up actuating the ABS very early to avoid spinning, or on cars with no ABS, you just end up spinning.
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold
-
QuirkySwede
- Posts: 137
- Joined: 24 November 2013
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 GLT
- Location: midwest
- Been thanked: 12 times
Even if the disc has a larger diameter, if the pads and caliper piston(s) is smaller than less braking power is developed. Imagine pinching a wagon wheel with your fingers versus a 12" disc with a hydraulic caliper. Same goes for when a different proportioning is used at the MC end.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post






