I have this same car, this can be fixed by giving the waste gate 1/2 to 1 turns, you don't have to mash it, 60% throttle and it will start to take off. Normal driving is not affected.jblackburn wrote:After not driving my old S70 for a year, I was really surprised at how hard you have to mash down on the gas for power out on the highway - but when you do, it spools up and zooms away.mecheng wrote:I take my comment about the LPT back, I know prefer the HPT because I figured how to use it. You just need to push harder on the pedal LOL. The best is rolling accleration when it drops down a gear; it feels like a lot more than 236hp. The T5 is a great engine; mid range and high end. The LPT is good but loses steam pretty quickly mid to high rpm.
I agree, the styling of the 850 and S70 is distinct but the S70 perfected the angular styling without looking dated. My S70 gets a lot of stares; I don't like the non painted bumpers on the 850.
Electronic throttles change everything. They give you pretty much everything the car's got to give at 50-70% throttle, and then have nothing left when you floor it
850 Versus S70
This topic is in the MVS Volvo Repair Database »
Volvo 850 and S70/V70: What's the Difference?
-
mecheng
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: 27 March 2014
- Year and Model: 1998 Volvo S70 T5
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: 850 Versus S70
1998 Volvo S70 T5 - SE - 240km - Sold July 2018
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Done it.mecheng wrote:I have this same car, this can be fixed by giving the waste gate 1/2 to 1 turns, you don't have to mash it, 60% throttle and it will start to take off. Normal driving is not affected.jblackburn wrote:After not driving my old S70 for a year, I was really surprised at how hard you have to mash down on the gas for power out on the highway - but when you do, it spools up and zooms away.mecheng wrote:I take my comment about the LPT back, I know prefer the HPT because I figured how to use it. You just need to push harder on the pedal LOL. The best is rolling accleration when it drops down a gear; it feels like a lot more than 236hp. The T5 is a great engine; mid range and high end. The LPT is good but loses steam pretty quickly mid to high rpm.
I agree, the styling of the 850 and S70 is distinct but the S70 perfected the angular styling without looking dated. My S70 gets a lot of stares; I don't like the non painted bumpers on the 850.
Electronic throttles change everything. They give you pretty much everything the car's got to give at 50-70% throttle, and then have nothing left when you floor it
60% is "mashing it" for me
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
-
hausmeister
- Posts: 572
- Joined: 22 July 2006
- Year and Model: 1995 850T5-R
- Location: Austria
- Has thanked: 250 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
I think it comes down to how good the car was maintained. The s70 has a bit better sound dampening and some other improvements that are imo mostly cosmetic.phils94850 wrote:ive owned both S70 T5 and 850 turbo/R's. I prefer the 850s as far as performance and quality, I think the S70 is better as far as comfort driving.
In my case as I said the s70 rides way better, but that is only because I took good care of it and the 850 still needs a lot of love (eg. rear suspension is bad) and was not maintained correctly before I got it.
If you do a "suspension stage 0" on an s70 and an 850 I don't think there would be much difference.
850 T5-R '95 auto 

-
mecheng
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: 27 March 2014
- Year and Model: 1998 Volvo S70 T5
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
I think I figured out the massive difference in steering feel is due to different racks.
850 came with TRW rack: lots of weight to the feel
S70s mainly came with SMI rack: heavily assisted
I prefer the TRW rack, except for long distance driving.
I noticed the 2.4LPT in the 850 has a deep growl sound to it.
My 2.3HPT in the S70 is very quiet, it only has a faint turbo sound. The 5 cylinder growl is very faint
Is that a characteristic of these engines or did they make the exhaust and engine note more quiet in the S70??
850 came with TRW rack: lots of weight to the feel
S70s mainly came with SMI rack: heavily assisted
I prefer the TRW rack, except for long distance driving.
I noticed the 2.4LPT in the 850 has a deep growl sound to it.
My 2.3HPT in the S70 is very quiet, it only has a faint turbo sound. The 5 cylinder growl is very faint
Is that a characteristic of these engines or did they make the exhaust and engine note more quiet in the S70??
1998 Volvo S70 T5 - SE - 240km - Sold July 2018
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Was that a late 98/99 switch? I have a TRW - steering feels like driving a tank.mecheng wrote:I think I figured out the massive difference in steering feel is due to different racks.
850 came with TRW rack: lots of weight to the feel
S70s mainly came with SMI rack: heavily assisted
I prefer the TRW rack, except for long distance driving.
I noticed the 2.4LPT in the 850 has a deep growl sound to it.
My 2.3HPT in the S70 is very quiet, it only has a faint turbo sound. The 5 cylinder growl is very faint
Is that a characteristic of these engines or did they make the exhaust and engine note more quiet in the S70??
Also sounds like a big, angry truck when that 16T spools. The 1998 does spool noticeably slower than an 850 T5, 1999 was better due to different flange and VVT.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
-
precopster
- Posts: 7543
- Joined: 21 August 2010
- Year and Model: Lots
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
Noticed the same thing on both 1999 and 2000 V70s regarding the steering weight and feel. The self-centering is also not as good on the later cars with SMI rack when compared to 850s.
I always thought it was the different PS pump however what jblackburn said makes sense as my V70 2000 has an SMI rack. I have a 1998 V70R also and haven't driven it enough to comment; the huge turning circle of the AWD took me by surprise though. Was this a feature of the AWD 850s as well?
I always thought it was the different PS pump however what jblackburn said makes sense as my V70 2000 has an SMI rack. I have a 1998 V70R also and haven't driven it enough to comment; the huge turning circle of the AWD took me by surprise though. Was this a feature of the AWD 850s as well?
Current cars VW Transporter 2.5TDI, 2010 XC90 D5 R Design
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
We never got those in the US. The Canadians got a handful in 1997.Was this a feature of the AWD 850s as well?
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
-
mecheng
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: 27 March 2014
- Year and Model: 1998 Volvo S70 T5
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Yes, I think so. I have the mech tensioner so I have a later 98.jblackburn wrote:Was that a late 98/99 switch? I have a TRW - steering feels like driving a tank.mecheng wrote:I think I figured out the massive difference in steering feel is due to different racks.
850 came with TRW rack: lots of weight to the feel
S70s mainly came with SMI rack: heavily assisted
I prefer the TRW rack, except for long distance driving.
I noticed the 2.4LPT in the 850 has a deep growl sound to it.
My 2.3HPT in the S70 is very quiet, it only has a faint turbo sound. The 5 cylinder growl is very faint
Is that a characteristic of these engines or did they make the exhaust and engine note more quiet in the S70??
Also sounds like a big, angry truck when that 16T spools. The 1998 does spool noticeably slower than an 850 T5, 1999 was better due to different flange and VVT.
I flushed the ps fluid in both thinking it was old and would make a difference. It didn't.
The TRW rack is good for forearm work outs, I kinda like it. They went overboard on the assist on SMI racks
The 16t once awake is an angry beast indeed. Otherwise the entire engine in my HPT is pretty smooth and quiet
The 97LPT has a nice growl even from idle; it's never as quiet as my S70.
1998 Volvo S70 T5 - SE - 240km - Sold July 2018
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
1997 Volvo 850 GLT - 190km
Boost is my drug of choice
-
scot850
- Posts: 14885
- Joined: 5 April 2010
- Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Has thanked: 1847 times
- Been thanked: 1710 times
I think it all comes down to personal driving styles and what you are used to. I've had an 93 850 GLT, a 98 V70XC both on standard 15" rims and currently have a 2000 V70R on 17" rims.
For me, the 93 road a little harder than the 98 it had Bilstien Touring front shocks, the 98 OE Sachs, but the 93 drove much better, road the road better and felt more solid. Still loved the 98 for the bad weather and it did run smoother on the rougher roads, but didn't have as solid a feel to the road. 93 was much better made, but then both have their respective issues when it came to breaking parts.
The 2000 runs way harder on the road, but although having wider tires, with lower profile, does not feel as glued as the 93 did. That is inspite of the lower profile tires, IPD anti-sway bars, and end links. Some of this may be down to tire choice. I have removed the Bilstein HD front shocks as they are way too hard for the roads around here, particularly on rutted winter roads.
93 850 was somewhat gut-less until you got the revs up, 98 was great as the LPT turbo was tuned for low down torque, so was quick of the mark. 2000 is just silly with RICA power, but fun.
If I were to buy another 850/P80, it would probably be either a 850R wagon, or Turbo wagon. Like wagons for there usefulness. Won't be buying another pre-2004 AWD Volvo. I'll stick to FWD and good tires and the relative simplicity mechanically and cheaper parts.
Like I said, it is all preferences to what you like.
Neil.
For me, the 93 road a little harder than the 98 it had Bilstien Touring front shocks, the 98 OE Sachs, but the 93 drove much better, road the road better and felt more solid. Still loved the 98 for the bad weather and it did run smoother on the rougher roads, but didn't have as solid a feel to the road. 93 was much better made, but then both have their respective issues when it came to breaking parts.
The 2000 runs way harder on the road, but although having wider tires, with lower profile, does not feel as glued as the 93 did. That is inspite of the lower profile tires, IPD anti-sway bars, and end links. Some of this may be down to tire choice. I have removed the Bilstein HD front shocks as they are way too hard for the roads around here, particularly on rutted winter roads.
93 850 was somewhat gut-less until you got the revs up, 98 was great as the LPT turbo was tuned for low down torque, so was quick of the mark. 2000 is just silly with RICA power, but fun.
If I were to buy another 850/P80, it would probably be either a 850R wagon, or Turbo wagon. Like wagons for there usefulness. Won't be buying another pre-2004 AWD Volvo. I'll stick to FWD and good tires and the relative simplicity mechanically and cheaper parts.
Like I said, it is all preferences to what you like.
Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold
- whilst
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 27 October 2009
- Year and Model: 1995 854T
- Location: Baltimore,MD
- Been thanked: 2 times
Hi all.
Infrequent poster,frequent lurker.
I have a '95 850t,daughter has '98 S70 'Base"-early.
Always have been dissatisfied with 'ride' of turbo. Trucklike is kind. Tried Koni Sport, back to Sachs; now running Koni S.T.R.T. ( Sports were better)
Did the aluminum control arms with 'floating' polys,back to new irons. Everything,I mean everything is new-Frt.& Rear. More exact steering and handling, but no change in ride quality.
Daughters' S70 all new 'stuff. Has always ridden with much less harshness!
> I believe it's due to the springs having a lower rate.
If the car dies, I'm going to swap out and confirm.
Also believe, the stock 'bonded' sway bars, contribute to the higher spring rate.
IPD bars seem to help> "floating" type.
S70 seems to have better 'centering' return and lighter effort.
My posit,anyway.
Cheers.
Infrequent poster,frequent lurker.
I have a '95 850t,daughter has '98 S70 'Base"-early.
Always have been dissatisfied with 'ride' of turbo. Trucklike is kind. Tried Koni Sport, back to Sachs; now running Koni S.T.R.T. ( Sports were better)
Did the aluminum control arms with 'floating' polys,back to new irons. Everything,I mean everything is new-Frt.& Rear. More exact steering and handling, but no change in ride quality.
Daughters' S70 all new 'stuff. Has always ridden with much less harshness!
> I believe it's due to the springs having a lower rate.
If the car dies, I'm going to swap out and confirm.
Also believe, the stock 'bonded' sway bars, contribute to the higher spring rate.
IPD bars seem to help> "floating" type.
S70 seems to have better 'centering' return and lighter effort.
My posit,anyway.
Cheers.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 1167 Views
-
Last post by difflock54
-
- 8 Replies
- 1876 Views
-
Last post by jimmy57






