Login Register

Contanimated gas, Station insurer acknowledges problem but tries to deny claim.

General discussion about Volvos, Volvo parts, your DIY skills, Volvo ownership, and more. Come on in, introduce yourself and say hi! List Volvo events here. Have a nice Volvo? Show it off here. Do you have a question or comment about how MVS works? Ask here.
Post Reply
User avatar
mrbrian200
Posts: 1554
Joined: 20 January 2016
Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Contanimated gas, Station insurer acknowledges problem but tries to deny claim.

Post by mrbrian200 »

Another disturbing news story. Contaminated gasoline at a Citgo in the Chicago area.. The station's insurer (American Family) acknowledges problem but seems their policy is to deny claims (unless news media picks up on it?)

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Ta ... 85213.html

Seriously, if this is the behavior insurers are going to be allowed to get away with here in the states do OEs need to think about building water separators/contamination sensors into vehicle fuel systems now? Not everybody has local news media that still does investigative journalism/call out bad behavior (tends to be larger news operations based in major cities).

User avatar
93Regina
Posts: 2813
Joined: 18 January 2014
Year and Model: 93:240/940
Location: Sunflower State
Been thanked: 65 times

Post by 93Regina »

mrbrian200 wrote: 07 May 2017, 10:28Contaminated gasoline at a Citgo in the Chicago area.
RE: "ground water had seeped in"

In the state I live in, years ago, state law mandates all stations contribute to a fund that pays for removing these tanks, and clean up.

Years ago, transport pipe-lines used water as the separator between fuels, so if a tank-distributor did not separate out this water, it ended up in the fuel. Industry use to blame consumers when water ended up in their tanks. I suspect now days, their timing to switch valves is much better.

Years ago, one city had a bunch of fuel stations leaking fuel into ground water...to this day, that water is un-usable, unless a costly fuel/water separator is build.

It was years ago when test equipment was required, at least in my state, to monitor underground tanks. I assumed this was an EPA mandate, but if true, it begs the question why this equipment failed at that station.

Hence, this was either a ground water issue (leaking tank), or a tanker pulled in with some water in its load.

Post Reply