After watching this video and also noting that on my sister's old VW Jetta with a virtually identical style Bosch throttle body the internal gears still looked brand new at 180,000 miles whereas these gears wore/failed on my S60 at less than half that mileage..
[youtube][/youtube]
It occurred to me, when I inspected the TB on the Jetta, it was dry with NO sign engine oil contaminating the internals of the TB. On the Volvo, just as shown in this youtube video, there was engine oil contaminating the internals, though not as much on my car as there is in that video, there was a 'slick coat' of engine oil inside there.
So can we safely deduce that these nylon gears are not adequately resistant to oil/oil additives? I say probably.
What's the difference? Why did the inside of the TB on the VW stay clean but not on the Volvo? Ahhh.... TURBO!
On a turbo vehicle positive pressure will push PCV gasses (and oil) introduced upstream of the TB past the throttle plate and into the mechanism. The rubber seal around the plastic cover might be inadequate in that it doesn't provide a true seal against pressure (or vacuum). A NA vehicle would never experience this positive pressure condition, and thus, if that rubber cover isn't perfectly sealed, it would suck fresh air in through the mechanism toward the intake stream instead the other direction.
So, I propose, lacking an o-ring or some sort of oil seal between the butterfly and the internal mechanism, and/or these nylon plastic gears be made out of something else that is immune to engine oil/additives, these Bosch TBs as designed are unsuitable for Turbo vehicles. At least for long term use/expecting it to last the lifetime of the vehicle.
Edit: this seemingly experienced, likely professional mechanic states near the beginning 'these fail more often on Volvos for some reason'. Well yeah...Volvo makes lots of turbo cars, and has for a long time. I don't consider this so much a fault of Volvo, but a Bosch engineering failure to consider/address positive charge pressure in their design (that they sell to Volvo). With turbo and supercharged engines becoming more of the norm, the issue will become more widespread, at least on makes that use Bosch TBs.
Why do Bosch type throttle bodies fail so often on Volvos? A theory..
- mrbrian200
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: 20 January 2016
- Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
- Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
- mrbrian200
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: 20 January 2016
- Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
- Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
I didn't make the video. Came across it looking for something else. That's exactly what failed on mine.
- abscate
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 35275
- Joined: 17 February 2013
- Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
- Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
- Has thanked: 1500 times
- Been thanked: 3810 times
That means we should see different statistics on turbo vs NA throttle body failures , if true.
We could just add an internal TB cleaning to the turbo pm list, too?
We could just add an internal TB cleaning to the turbo pm list, too?
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread
- wizechatmgr
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: 12 January 2017
- Year and Model: 1999 V70 XC AWD 2.4T
- Location: Albany, NY area
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 126 times
- Contact:
I wonder if the nylon parts could be replaced with Delrin and a silicone o-ring... Nylon absorbs moisture and as a result expands and shrinks just a little bit as the humidity changes.
Wisdom requires knowledge as a prerequisite, but knowledge can be developed due to a lack of wisdom.
In order to learn how to fix something, you must first learn how to break it.
1999 V70 XC AWD 2.4 T -- ~231k miles
1998 V70 2.4 NA -- ~184k miles
In order to learn how to fix something, you must first learn how to break it.
1999 V70 XC AWD 2.4 T -- ~231k miles
1998 V70 2.4 NA -- ~184k miles
- mrbrian200
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: 20 January 2016
- Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
- Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
Those gears might already be probably are Delrin. Some grades mistaken for Nylon at a glance, my bad.
http://www.emcoplastics.com/assets/pdf/ ... Dupont.pdf
Delrin is resistant to a lot of chemicals, but not all. I would imagine anything listed as 'D-severe effect' and 'C-fair' would be detrimental after a short concentrated exposure (some spray cleaners?) or long term trace exposure.
https://www.calpaclab.com/acetal-polyox ... ity-chart/
Chemicals listed as 'B-good' might still have a long term wear effect (petro oil is listed as such). Heat might be a factor as well. There are quite a few substances Delrin really doesn't like. Including, keytones, lacquers, chlorine, certain oils, and ..umm.. fruit juice???
http://www.emcoplastics.com/assets/pdf/ ... Dupont.pdf
Delrin is resistant to a lot of chemicals, but not all. I would imagine anything listed as 'D-severe effect' and 'C-fair' would be detrimental after a short concentrated exposure (some spray cleaners?) or long term trace exposure.
https://www.calpaclab.com/acetal-polyox ... ity-chart/
Chemicals listed as 'B-good' might still have a long term wear effect (petro oil is listed as such). Heat might be a factor as well. There are quite a few substances Delrin really doesn't like. Including, keytones, lacquers, chlorine, certain oils, and ..umm.. fruit juice???
- June
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: 4 May 2016
- Year and Model: 2004 S80 T6,1991 740
- Location: Arkansas
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 261 times
Is there a thread to show the statistics age/miles/na or turbo of when these fail? Sometimes I wonder when the dreaded thing is going to fail leaving me stuck somewhere inconvenient. So far so good for my car. June
My Volvo cars owned
1989 740 GLT ordered
1994 850 4door standard shift ordered
1996 960 ordered
1998 S90 ordered totalled after 3 weeks
1998 V70 GT dealer stock car
2002 S80 T6 ordered totalled
2004 S80 T6 dealer stock car and current car owned
1989 740 GLT ordered
1994 850 4door standard shift ordered
1996 960 ordered
1998 S90 ordered totalled after 3 weeks
1998 V70 GT dealer stock car
2002 S80 T6 ordered totalled
2004 S80 T6 dealer stock car and current car owned
- mrbrian200
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: 20 January 2016
- Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
- Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
You're likely to see fuel trim/MAF codes (but still runs and drives fine) before it gets to the point where you'd get stranded. That was my experience. I was getting intermittent fuel trim/MAF DTCs and an occasional rough start (when cold). But ran and drove fine except that engine power output didn't feel linear to the accelerator pedal travel below about 30% throttle. The amount of wear shown on that TB in the video I linked was way worse than mine. The car that came off of probably had intermittent CELs for a year or more the owner didn't get resolved until it finally got bad enough to trigger limp mode.
- callahanoffroad
- Posts: 437
- Joined: 30 June 2014
- Year and Model: 1995 850
- Location: St. Louis Missouri
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Some fruit juices are corrosive, like orange, lime, lemon and pineapple. Pineapple contains a chemical that is actually fantastic at breaking down animal proteins. Citrus juices contain citric acid, which also breaks down proteins.mrbrian200 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2018, 21:00 Those gears might already be probably are Delrin. Some grades mistaken for Nylon at a glance, my bad.
http://www.emcoplastics.com/assets/pdf/ ... Dupont.pdf
Delrin is resistant to a lot of chemicals, but not all. I would imagine anything listed as 'D-severe effect' and 'C-fair' would be detrimental after a short concentrated exposure (some spray cleaners?) or long term trace exposure.
https://www.calpaclab.com/acetal-polyox ... ity-chart/
Chemicals listed as 'B-good' might still have a long term wear effect (petro oil is listed as such). Heat might be a factor as well. There are quite a few substances Delrin really doesn't like. Including, keytones, lacquers, chlorine, certain oils, and ..umm.. fruit juice???
I'm sure the sugars aren't great for the delrin's low-carb diet
Author, Chef, and Shade Tree Mechanic
1995 Volvo 850, Non-Turbo, VVIS, LH FI, Green, 215,000 miles. B5254FS engine. Herman. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=84393
1996 Volvo 850, died at 280,000
Founder of: CookingForChemo.Org
Read my Silly Comic Book at: therealpizzabros.com/
1995 Volvo 850, Non-Turbo, VVIS, LH FI, Green, 215,000 miles. B5254FS engine. Herman. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=84393
1996 Volvo 850, died at 280,000
Founder of: CookingForChemo.Org
Read my Silly Comic Book at: therealpizzabros.com/
- mrbrian200
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: 20 January 2016
- Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
- Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
Looks like I got another one. Not my car, a friend of a friend's 2006 V70 (T2 LPT), I was called because they were having trouble figuring it out.
AF codes and high idle (among other unrelated DTCs). It was idling at 900-1000 RPM. It would initially 'try' to idle lower (roughly) but then RPM raised as it richened the mix to attain proper AF based on closed loop.
AT KPII/engine off the throttle plate position was sitting at 14.5%. Mine liked to stick at multiples of ~7% when the internal gears are worn/binding/sticking. This is probably evidence that leans toward a conclusion it's probably how they all act. I left this afternoon thinking he had an intake leak that I couldn't find and recommended arranging for a smoke test, that the 14% might be the ECU opening the throttle plate in preparation for start. Then this evening reexamined my head and checked how the throttle plate acts on mine. No, the ECU does not open the throttle plate at KPII. It sat at 2% on mine unless I pressed down on the pedal.
The interesting bit is that he replaced the TB for a bad position sensor about 6 months ago. Which is why I was wanting to discount the TB as a culprit. He bought the car within the last year. He paid ~$270 for the replacement TB, didn't remember where he ordered it off hand: likely not a Bosch TB, certainly not blue box.
So the 'cheaper' aftermarket TBs don't even last a full year! ..probably my whole point to this post. You just had to wait for it.
Footnote- large evap leak was the hose from the canister didn't get seated/locked into the purge valve fully and came out. And I switched out CP#3 with one of my spares. I made him aware that he needs an alternator rebuild. And lectured him regarding an unknown timing belt at 180k miles. And it's due for a WP soon.
Edit: how bad does this have to get before it triggers ECM-925/926/9270/9280 (throttle angle desired value does not correspond to the throttle angle actual value)? See frame data below to the right. On my car with a good TB, watching live try as I might (pressing the pedal at different positions/velocities) I can't get these two numbers to differ more than ~1%.
AF codes and high idle (among other unrelated DTCs). It was idling at 900-1000 RPM. It would initially 'try' to idle lower (roughly) but then RPM raised as it richened the mix to attain proper AF based on closed loop.
AT KPII/engine off the throttle plate position was sitting at 14.5%. Mine liked to stick at multiples of ~7% when the internal gears are worn/binding/sticking. This is probably evidence that leans toward a conclusion it's probably how they all act. I left this afternoon thinking he had an intake leak that I couldn't find and recommended arranging for a smoke test, that the 14% might be the ECU opening the throttle plate in preparation for start. Then this evening reexamined my head and checked how the throttle plate acts on mine. No, the ECU does not open the throttle plate at KPII. It sat at 2% on mine unless I pressed down on the pedal.
The interesting bit is that he replaced the TB for a bad position sensor about 6 months ago. Which is why I was wanting to discount the TB as a culprit. He bought the car within the last year. He paid ~$270 for the replacement TB, didn't remember where he ordered it off hand: likely not a Bosch TB, certainly not blue box.
So the 'cheaper' aftermarket TBs don't even last a full year! ..probably my whole point to this post. You just had to wait for it.
Footnote- large evap leak was the hose from the canister didn't get seated/locked into the purge valve fully and came out. And I switched out CP#3 with one of my spares. I made him aware that he needs an alternator rebuild. And lectured him regarding an unknown timing belt at 180k miles. And it's due for a WP soon.
Edit: how bad does this have to get before it triggers ECM-925/926/9270/9280 (throttle angle desired value does not correspond to the throttle angle actual value)? See frame data below to the right. On my car with a good TB, watching live try as I might (pressing the pedal at different positions/velocities) I can't get these two numbers to differ more than ~1%.






