Login Register

The new QX50 engine techonolgy

General discussion about Volvos, Volvo parts, your DIY skills, Volvo ownership, and more. Come on in, introduce yourself and say hi! List Volvo events here. Have a nice Volvo? Show it off here. Do you have a question or comment about how MVS works? Ask here.
Post Reply
User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

The new QX50 engine techonolgy

Post by oragex »

The new QX50 Infinity has Nissan's Variable Compression Ratio Engine (a little bit long to write down). An interesting technology owned by Nissan

https://jalopnik.com/worlds-first-varia ... 1785295848



jimmy57
Posts: 6694
Joined: 12 November 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70R GT, et al
Location: Ponder Texas
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 320 times

Post by jimmy57 »

There seems to not be a payoff for all those extra pieces. The power output and MPG are meh.

User avatar
June
Posts: 2275
Joined: 4 May 2016
Year and Model: 2004 S80 T6,1991 740
Location: Arkansas
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Post by June »

Looks like a mechanical nightmare to me if it ever gave trouble! 1981 Cadillac 4,6,8 comes to mind... Ahead of it's time. Really only time will tell if this technology is sound. On paper it sounds good though. June
My Volvo cars owned
1989 740 GLT ordered
1994 850 4door standard shift ordered
1996 960 ordered
1998 S90 ordered totalled after 3 weeks
1998 V70 GT dealer stock car
2002 S80 T6 ordered totalled
2004 S80 T6 dealer stock car and current car owned

thebull
Posts: 44
Joined: 2 January 2012
Year and Model: XC90 R-Design 2009
Location: Vancouver
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by thebull »

I`ve seen this perhaps more than 8 months ago. It is good to see these kind of engineering marvels once in a while. Practical - absolutely no. Will I buy car with this engine - NO. IMO internal combustion engine got the highest efficiency possible balancing reliability, performance, efficiency. There is no way to move 5000 - 6000lbs without burning that much fuel anymore. Solution - more high efficient drive trains aka electric, hybrid, turbine stop and go(complete BS). When I see those kind of innovations always thinking about the perfect machine and the perfect machine contains no moving parts. This - lots of moving parts - far from perfect.
Flying on 2009 XC90 R-design 3.2L AWD and 2006 XC90 2.5T AWD. Volvo owner forever.

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

Agree it's more exciting from an innovative point of view, than from a practical one. It's both a very possible extra headache and almost surely not something really needed. I wonder why Nissan simply didn't go the straight froward and very popular way of the turbo charged (or even supercharged like Volvo) 4 cylinder engines. Are they afraid of using a turbo ? They don't really have turbo engines in their line-up for some reason (at least I'm not aware). Nissan says this technology will save 30% in gas compared with their 3.5 V6 - only, basically anything compared with that thirsty V6 is going to be more economical.

I drove in the past the last Audi Q5 with that amazing 4 cyl 2.0T and not only that engine was so sweet at high regimes, but it was also pulling a lot and gave shocking mpg numbers even in city driving (also thanks to the 7 speeds transmission). So a 4cyl turbo is the way to go and it's simple to build, no reason to invest years and surely hefty amounts of money to develop some new tech. But, like said, it's not the practical side, rather the innovative side that's cool to see. Perhaps it will get forgotten in the history just like the Miller cycle did on the Mazda Millenia (another cool idea that didn't catch).

Post Reply