Login Register

What did you do to your Volvo today? Topic is solved

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6338
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 304 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Re: What did you do to your Volvo today? (now Sticky!!)

Post by bmdubya1198 »

ZionXIX wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 09:29
abscate wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 08:58 Paid homage to Gabriel Voison and For a rubber squeaking , full ABS deployment stop in dry pavement that just kept me from hitting a Hyandai in the Mass Pike

Pissed at myself for lack of sit awareness, the realised he had no brake lights and I had atoppped on a pure visual speed reference alone. That’s actually praiseworthy.
Its amazing how fast your brain can calculate from "its all good" to "$#!%....gonnadiegonnadiegonnadie"
It really is. I had some idiot yesterday come completely into my lane, fortunately she looked up from her phone just in time to not hit me!
People who pay zero attention while driving should have their licenses revoked instantly. It just pisses me off that these people can continue to put peoples' lives in danger and they rarely get caught.
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

bmdubya1198 wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 10:13 People who pay zero attention while driving should have their licenses revoked instantly.
I have been saying the same for some time because: According to NHTSA, text messaging or using a mobile phone while driving now accounts for most car crashes that used to be attributed solely to driving under the influence or DUI. Statistically, the use of a cellphone when driving is six times more dangerous than drunk driving.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6338
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 304 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Post by bmdubya1198 »

RickHaleParker wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 15:02
bmdubya1198 wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 10:13 People who pay zero attention while driving should have their licenses revoked instantly.
I have been saying the same for some time because: According to NHTSA, text messaging or using a mobile phone while driving now accounts for most car crashes that used to be attributed solely to driving under the influence or DUI. Statistically, the use of a cellphone when driving is six times more dangerous than drunk driving.
Definitely. At least drunk drivers are trying to pay attention... although they're usually doing a terrible job. Most people on their phones just get sucked into their phones and sometimes just stop looking at the road.
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

User avatar
WhatAmIDoing
Posts: 965
Joined: 30 July 2016
Year and Model: 1998 S/V70 T5M
Location: North America
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Post by WhatAmIDoing »

j-dawg wrote: 06 Mar 2019, 18:53
bmdubya1198 wrote: 06 Mar 2019, 07:51 I get what they're trying to do, but the restrictions on modifications are just ridiculous. I mean, it's not like everyone is going to be modifying their cars. I get that "every little bit counts" for reducing emissions, but I don't think Joe Shmo who just drives his car to work and the store and wherever else and isn't into cars is going to care about modifying his car in any way. California seems like hell for car enthusiasts!
agreed on the ridiculousness. most of these rules are actually relatively recent, within the last 15 years. I also agree with abscate that it's super important to have an emissions control program, and it's hard to overstate the benefits those programs have yielded for our lungs over the last several decades.

what gets me is that the sniffer - the most labor-intensive way to test emissions, the thing that directly measures what you want to limit - is *supplemented* with the visual inspection. like, who cares how you get to acceptable emissions? who cares what parts are on the car, as long as it's not spewing NOx? that might be an understandable rule if you didn't want to commit people to a sniffer test, but you're doing the harder thing anyway. why add a step that disqualifies cars that you've verified don't actually make the air less clean?

as far as California being hell for car enthusiasts, I think there's a very strong case to be made for southern California being the global center of modified car culture, and it's still going strong. everything from lowriders to desert trucks to riced-out Hondas got its start or made it big in SoCal, and the ratio of cool modified car to everything else is higher in LA than anywhere else I've lived. there are more obstacles, but it's obviously not killing the scene.
I think Volkswagen proved that visual inspections, OBDII emissions, and sniffer tests don't really work.
'98 S70 T5M - 323,000mi - awaiting heart transplant :shock:
'98 V70 T5M - 324,000mi - my new project
'99 S70 "AWD" - 220,000+mi - gone :cry:
Knows enough to be dangerous :wink:

User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6338
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 304 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Post by bmdubya1198 »

Haha, that's true! But they definitely had to pay for it!
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

bmdubya1198 wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 17:25 Definitely. At least drunk drivers are trying to pay attention... although they're usually doing a terrible job. Most people on their phones just get sucked into their phones and sometimes just stop looking at the road.
That is why the exception for hands free use of cell phones is fatally flawed. It is not what your doing with your hands that is the threat. The threat is what one doing with their mind or should I say, what one is not doing with their mind.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

User avatar
Rattnalle
Posts: 1674
Joined: 1 September 2017
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Sweden
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Rattnalle »

RickHaleParker wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 19:20
bmdubya1198 wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 17:25 Definitely. At least drunk drivers are trying to pay attention... although they're usually doing a terrible job. Most people on their phones just get sucked into their phones and sometimes just stop looking at the road.
That is why the exception for hands free use of cell phones is fatally flawed. It is not what your doing with your hands that is the threat. The threat is what one doing with their mind or should I say, what one is not doing with their mind.
Might as well ban speaking to the passengers or driving with kids in the car and well then. I do get your point but there has to be a limit somewhere. People need to learn to prioritise their attention though. I often find myself having to rewind my audio book, or realise that I haven't heard a thing of what the others in the car have said if there's been something going on outside the car. Brain seems to just shut off those inputs.

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

Rattnalle wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 23:05 Might as well ban speaking to the passengers or driving with kids in the car and well then. I do get your point but there has to be a limit somewhere.
The way I see it: If you are distracting the driver, you are an idiot. Because your life in the hands of the driver.
My Father made it real clear why he expected us kids to behave when in the car.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

User avatar
Rattnalle
Posts: 1674
Joined: 1 September 2017
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Sweden
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Rattnalle »

RickHaleParker wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 23:09
Rattnalle wrote: 07 Mar 2019, 23:05 Might as well ban speaking to the passengers or driving with kids in the car and well then. I do get your point but there has to be a limit somewhere.
The way I see it: If you are distracting the driver, you are an idiot. Because your life in the hands of the driver.
Doesn't have to be on purpose though. Just being there is in itself a distraction.

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35308
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3819 times

Post by abscate »

If I had been on the phone I would have pranged it for sure. My rule is, right hand lane, cruise on, 67 mph speed ( about 20% speed percentile) I will use phone hands free. Otherwise, no.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post