Login Register

Volvo to put cameras inside its cars to watch you next year

General discussion about Volvos, Volvo parts, your DIY skills, Volvo ownership, and more. Come on in, introduce yourself and say hi! List Volvo events here. Have a nice Volvo? Show it off here. Do you have a question or comment about how MVS works? Ask here.
Post Reply
User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35284
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1502 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Re: Volvo to put cameras inside its cars to watch you next year

Post by abscate »

There are already Cameras in Volvos since 1992. You are just finding out about them now.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

jimmy57
Posts: 6694
Joined: 12 November 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70R GT, et al
Location: Ponder Texas
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 320 times

Post by jimmy57 »

I'm 61 years old. The big brother stuff I worried about has never impacted me. Persons that have no concern that extends past the end of their nose have done me the harm. I only worry that the camera monitoring doesn't yield a sharp face slap or an electric shock. I have driven all Volvo models extensively from early 80's through 2018 model year. All the late ones had the full autobrake, adaptive cruise, Pilot Assist 2, and anything else they offered. Yes, initially a lot of those features bothered me. Why? I thought of myself as a precision driver. I have no history of accidents in spite of a long history of speeding tickets. BUT I found that I crossed over lines a lot. I did way too much anticipating that people would clear my path when they were turning in front of me. I got beeps and brake applications a lot. When Pilot Assist 2 arrived I fought the steering control a lot until I figured out I drove on the edge of lanes away from center line as the system was always trying to get me centered, not that giving more clearance to other vehicles is a bad thing. I think cell phones and in house voice assistant devices are far more onerous than technology in cars to keep us from killing ourselves and taking others out with us.

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14466
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2652 times
Been thanked: 1242 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

With phones, I accept the calculated deal. With the devil. Home voice assistants and interior car cameras, no thanks.

I’ll laugh at this post in 20 years 😂
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14466
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2652 times
Been thanked: 1242 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

bmdubya1198 wrote: 18 Apr 2019, 08:06The only manufacturer I still like as a whole for NEW cars would have to be Mazda.
Agreed. Mazda is making excellent cars lately. Driver's cars.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14466
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2652 times
Been thanked: 1242 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

Mazda has a higher-than-average overlap with Volvo on automobile design/goals ethos.

I had an '88 Mazda 323 2-dr hatch, and that car was very fun. Visibility and controls were top-notch.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6338
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 304 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Post by bmdubya1198 »

I've always liked the 323 GTX. Those are pretty cool cars!
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

Tex69
Posts: 41
Joined: 9 April 2019
Year and Model: 2007 V70 R
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Tex69 »

June wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 23:31 I have to disagree with the notion Volvo has lost their charm. You have to keep in mind what cars have become in 2019 and factor that in.

I also hate some of the trends in modern cars. Such as no key and the goofy infotainment screen to name the biggest offenses.

Unfortunately we can't roll the clock back to 1969 when the automobile was at it's pinnacle. Yes your Ford LTD had a 7.0 liter V8 and floted down the road like a magic carpet. Not to mention Chrysler had the 426 hemi at 425 hp 0 to 60 in less than 4 seconds.

Today we are looking at cars that watch out for us and it looks like you guys out there hate the idea. The reality is we should not be driving impaired. Not only is it illegal, but immoral. By driving drunk you might take out a innocent family! So in that respect I say my hats off to Volvo for taking the next step in occupant safety. June
I don't think Volvo has lost their charm, but I don't care for some of the changes in the newer cars. For one thing, the seats are different. They aren't as comfortable. My 2007 XC70 and now 2007 V70 R don't bother my neck and shoulders the way the seats in my wife's 2013 XC60 does. Like you, I don't care for the fobs. I prefer a key. Things are becoming to heavily computerized as well. I don't feel I'm driving a car, but that I'm driving a computer when in my wife's 2013 XC60. It's why I decided against a newer XC70 when buying a car this last February.

I don't disagree with what Volvo is doing, just how they are doing it. It makes me wonder how long until we have to blow into a tube in order to be able to start our cars. Drunk and distracted driving both need to be dealt with. I just think there are probably better ways to do it. Also to assume a younger driver poses a danger seems mistaken. It's true in some cases, but not all. Elderly drivers, and some ages in between can be equally dangerous. Does the setting for younger drivers apply to all ages, or will the camera prevent that?
Past: 1993 940 turbo wagon
2007 XC70

Current: 2013 XC60
2007 V70 R

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1961
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

A camera watching me while I'm driving - that is downright creepy.

Not a problem for me though, because I wouldn't buy a Volvo built after 07' anyway.
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

User avatar
93Regina
Posts: 2813
Joined: 18 January 2014
Year and Model: 93:240/940
Location: Sunflower State
Been thanked: 65 times

Post by 93Regina »

jimmy57 wrote: 18 Apr 2019, 09:20 I drove on the edge of lanes...not that giving more clearance to other vehicles is a bad thing
Sidenote -

Driving just off the center line, on a two lane road, is a good thing when a front steer tire blows out on rural roads with real ditches, especially when driving a 18 wheeler, as I do on the farm.

With a 18 wheeler, you have momentum, and when that driving direction is changed by a steer blow-out, initially, you have no control.

Where drivers go wrong is over-steering...one only turns the wheel a small pinch to compensate...it takes a number of seconds to regain control, but when a person over-steers, this will cause vehicle to lurch in opposite direction.

I've seen what happens when a trucker over-steers, the whole rig can end up on its side, even at reduced speeds in city environments

It's a weird experience...you turn the wheel a pinch, and nothing happens....then a clueless driver may panic and crank the wheel more, and presto, it grabs, then jack-knifing...its over.

User avatar
93Regina
Posts: 2813
Joined: 18 January 2014
Year and Model: 93:240/940
Location: Sunflower State
Been thanked: 65 times

Post by 93Regina »

Tex69 wrote: 23 Apr 2019, 10:14Elderly drivers, and some ages in between can be equally dangerous.
Studies have show younger and older drivers are somewhat equal, with those between more safe. But causes are different for younger vs older.

Post Reply