Login Register

solved the 99+ turbo intake banjo bolt installation problem!

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
j-dawg
Posts: 1154
Joined: 20 April 2013
Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 33 times

solved the 99+ turbo intake banjo bolt installation problem!

Post by j-dawg »

We all hate that banjo bolt. It's the worst party of working on any piece of this car. Regularly costs me an hour to remove and another to replace.

I bypassed the coolant loop. The common theory seems to be that the warm coolant keeps the PCV system clear; to me that ain't worth the suffering. I'd rather replace the PCV every 50k than deal with this bolt every time the intake comes off, which for some reason is pretty often on my car. This setup worked ~fine for cars before 99 so I don't see a reason it couldn't work for mine.

I haven't seen this arrangement suggested in the past so I encourage you to consider it. Would have saved me hours and hours of scraped knuckles and curses if I'd done it years before.
Attachments
IMG_20200301_174539.jpg
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold

User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6339
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Post by bmdubya1198 »

That's a good point... just how much could that really be doing, anyway? It makes sense to bypass it, especially if you drive your car harder at least occasionally.
I think the PCV is more likely to get clogged up due to constant passive driving and low revs than the lack of being warmed by coolant.
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

j-dawg wrote: 03 Mar 2020, 13:46
I bypassed the coolant loop. The common theory seems to be that the warm coolant keeps the PCV system clear; to me that ain't worth the suffering.
Stock up on Banjo bolts. The heating loop is there to keep the Banjo Bolt warm and flowing.
It is a hedge against clogged Banjo bolts.

Hum .. I wonder if the manifold could be piped and the Banjo bolt relocated to a more accessible location.

Perhaps a nipple in the manifold then run a hose to the new Banjo bolt location. When one goes to remove the manifold one pulls the hose off the manifold instead of trying to unbolt the Banjo bolt. Still need to dream up a fixture for the Banjo bolt and a location for it.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

j-dawg
Posts: 1154
Joined: 20 April 2013
Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Post by j-dawg »

bmdubya1198 wrote: 04 Mar 2020, 17:42 That's a good point... just how much could that really be doing, anyway? It makes sense to bypass it, especially if you drive your car harder at least occasionally.
I think the PCV is more likely to get clogged up due to constant passive driving and low revs than the lack of being warmed by coolant.
And by not having regular oil changes. But yeah, I'm not that worried about the difference. The 850-style system worked well enough.
RickHaleParker wrote: 04 Mar 2020, 19:31 Hum .. I wonder if the manifold could be piped and the Banjo bolt relocated to a more accessible location.

Perhaps a nipple in the manifold then run a hose to the new Banjo bolt location. When one goes to remove the manifold one pulls the hose off the manifold instead of trying to unbolt the Banjo bolt. Still need to dream up a fixture for the Banjo bolt and a location for it.
Seems to me this would add lots of un-heated length of small-diameter tube to get clogged up instead.

Most of the PCV system makes sense, but the line through the banjo bolt I don't get. Why connect the intake upstream of the turbo and the intake manifold? Not saying it's a worthless connection, or that a smart engineer somewhere didn't design it for a reason, but I don't understand it.
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35321
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1507 times
Been thanked: 3824 times

Post by abscate »

You probably get away with this in warmLA. In cold climates, we get the oil sludge problem in the PCV from cold running.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
bmdubya1198
Posts: 6339
Joined: 30 December 2014
Year and Model: 2K V70R M56
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Post by bmdubya1198 »

Basically the vacuum line going to the banjo bolt on the RN is in place of the vacuum line going to the side of the manifold on the N, right? I can't remember exactly where that hose goes on the PCV, so I don't know how necessary that connection is.

Edit... never mind, I missed the part about the banjo bolt still being in place! You only bypassed the coolant connection, right?
Last edited by bmdubya1198 on 05 Mar 2020, 11:50, edited 1 time in total.
00 V70R Venetian Red/Charcoal M56 Swapped 214k
07 XC90 V8 AWD Sport Titanium Grey/Black 220k
92 245 White/Beige 249k
91 944 Turbo 175k
…and a bunch of other stuff
Sold-
03 S60 2.4T
00 S70 GLT
98 V70 GLT
93 944
98 S90
95 850 GLT
01 S60 2.4T
05 S60R M66
08 S40 2.4i
88 744 Turbo M46

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

j-dawg wrote: 05 Mar 2020, 02:17 Most of the PCV system makes sense, but the line through the banjo bolt I don't get.
The turbo does not boost all the time. Most of the time the pressure in the intake manifold is less then atmospheric pressure. In short most of the time a turbo charged engine is naturally aspirated.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

j-dawg
Posts: 1154
Joined: 20 April 2013
Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Post by j-dawg »

RickHaleParker wrote: 05 Mar 2020, 10:57 The turbo does not boost all the time. Most of the time the pressure in the intake manifold is less then atmospheric pressure. In short most of the time a turbo charged engine is naturally aspirated.
Yes. My guess for that line's purpose is that when the turbo is not making boost the gases can be pulled through by manifold vacuum instead of through the turbo, which isn't pulling as hard.

I'm willing to risk modifying it, since it seems to me most of the venting capacity of this system comes from the intake pipe. Under boost, where crankcase ventilation will be most acutely needed, the turbo will be pulling hard through that path. An occasional dipstick or glove check at idle will let me know if the banjo bolt is getting clogged and needs a brake cleaner flush.
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold

User avatar
RickHaleParker
Posts: 7129
Joined: 25 May 2015
Year and Model: See Signature below.
Location: Kansas
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Post by RickHaleParker »

The vacuum before the turbo goes missing when the engine is idling or lightly laded. This is line to the intake manifold is for.

From Vida:
Engine coolant heated crankcase ventilation (turbocharged engines)

To counteract the risk of freezing in the crankcase ventilation pipe, it has been equipped with engine coolant heating. The heating is achieved by the coolant pipe being laid parallel to the crankcase ventilation pipe. The pipes have a common insulated sleeve.


The heated coolant comes from the rear of the engine. The pipe inlet is connected to the engine using a banjo coupling. The coupling hole diameter is calibrated so that the removal of the coolant should not affect the engine's normal coolant flow. The outlet is connected to the thermostat housing.


To ensure that there is always negative pressure in the crankcase ventilation, the hose between the PTC resistor and the flame trap has been equipped with an extra suction pipe. At the other end this extra suction pipe is connected to the engine intake manifold with a banjo coupling. The clutch hole diameter is calibrated so that the vacuum of the flame trap is held by the vacuum in the engine intake manifold up to 90 km/h (110 mph). After that the vacuum is taken from the turbo charger intake manifold.


The pipes for heating the crankcase ventilation pipe are aluminum and the rubber hoses used are extra tolerant of heat.
Without the Banjo the Crankcase would build a positive pressure when idling and just cruising.

In short: the air system is tapped in two places to insure there is always a vacuum to work with.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.

j-dawg
Posts: 1154
Joined: 20 April 2013
Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Post by j-dawg »

I'm a good guesser!
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post