Login Register

Issue with 96 850R Starting Not Turning Over Topic is solved

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
wackenhut
Posts: 212
Joined: 7 July 2015
Year and Model: 850R 1996
Location: FLORIDA

Re: Issue with 96 850R Starting Not Turning Over

Post by wackenhut »

I did a check on the thermostat based on the following and it came back as working per the instructions:

https://carcarecamp.com/how-tos/test-a- ... -removing/

Any other suggestions?

User avatar
Chuck W
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Post by Chuck W »

ECT sensor = engine coolant temperature sensor.

It's the sensor threaded into the lower portion of the thermostat housing. A little bit of a bugger to get to to replace. Even a corroded connector can cause hard-start issues, but will not cause a no-crank condition.
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

wackenhut
Posts: 212
Joined: 7 July 2015
Year and Model: 850R 1996
Location: FLORIDA

Post by wackenhut »

Yeah, it is not a hard-start issue...just a no-crank condition.

Thank you!

User avatar
Jaydiesel
Posts: 70
Joined: 4 August 2017
Year and Model: 95 850 T-5R, 00V70R
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by Jaydiesel »

oops yeah meant ECT. Anyways it probably be a atleast 2 weeks when i could have you drive up here to check out the car. But i really think you should look in replacing the positive cable going to the starter off the battery.Even if you have to take a visit to the junk yard to grab one and practice on the junk yard car first.

User avatar
Jaydiesel
Posts: 70
Joined: 4 August 2017
Year and Model: 95 850 T-5R, 00V70R
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by Jaydiesel »

Also FCPEURO has battery power cords too for your model. One is OEM and another is LIKE OEM but less money. also they have a lifetime warranty on what they sell. I believe the Volvo part number your looking for is 9456836.

wackenhut
Posts: 212
Joined: 7 July 2015
Year and Model: 850R 1996
Location: FLORIDA

Post by wackenhut »

Thank you. Of course as soon as I am able to figure out the resolution to this issue I will inform everyone. Crazy.

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

I know this is a distraction so apologies to OP but for the record: Actually you can't replace the cable from the positive battery terminal to the start by getting a junkyard item. That cable is integrated into the engine harness.

Similarly there is no factory replacement. If you buy Volvo 9456836 from a Volvo dealer or FCP etc branded as aftermarket you get the exact same part - a cheap, poorly made cable that you install in parallel to the factory harness cable, which can't be removed unless you cut it out (bad idea). The cheapo cable will get your car going for sure but it's not a very good long term solution. You're much better off making a heavy gauge cable yourself, you can search MVS for many posts about how to do that.

To help determine if the positive battery cable is a problem, check and see if the cable ens at the post heats up under usage. This is where/why they go bad, the connection to the lug corrodes away on the inside of the lug. Poor connection means higher resistance means it heats up, which makes the connection even poorer (higher resistance, less current). Then when the cable end cools off it conducts enough current again to get the car started.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

wackenhut
Posts: 212
Joined: 7 July 2015
Year and Model: 850R 1996
Location: FLORIDA

Post by wackenhut »

I appreciate it. I did all those tests and nothing comes up out of the ordinary. I am going to take the car to another shop. The last thing the indy mentioned was replacing the whole wiring harness but that would be very labor intensive. I am done spending unnecessary money.

User avatar
FLXC90
Posts: 1132
Joined: 18 August 2014
Year and Model: 98 V70 T5
Location: Florida Panhandle
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Post by FLXC90 »

First OP said shop replaced PNP switch and called car good. In a later post, OP stated that the shop had replaced the connectors at the starter terminals. Sounds like they found corroded cabling. Sounds like jreed parallel is called for.

Also, Misha asked "When no crank issue appears...try to start it in "N" position.
If it starts...it's PNP switch...if not....it could be ignition switch or starter solenoid." OP response was "yes, automatic."

OP, Misha's intent was to have you try starting with shifter in N as opposed to P for troubleshooting.
OP, this is all meant with respect not chastisement.
Current Volvos:
1998 V70 T5, 112k sat 5 years, still in mechanical coma (finally at the top of the pile )
2004 XC90 T6 AWD: 186k, 60 on transaxle ( traded in )
1998 POS70 N/A: DD/training aid, 236k but really about 240k, I think...ABS module( passed on to son who sold it)

wackenhut
Posts: 212
Joined: 7 July 2015
Year and Model: 850R 1996
Location: FLORIDA

Post by wackenhut »

Someone asked if it was an automatic and I said it was. Regarding the question by Misha, I did everything that was mentioned. I understand the intent. The shop replaced the PNP switch which was not the problem. I did not go back and edit my initial post, I apologize. It worked for a couple weeks and then did the same thing. So the original post should say the PNP switch was not the fix. It was not my diagnosis. As far as the connectors, not sure why they decided to replaced the terminals, but they did not mention any corroding.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post