Login Register

Wheel alignment; castor adjustment 2006 xc70

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
Rvolvos
Posts: 213
Joined: 1 April 2018
Year and Model: 2006 xc70
Location: Nevada
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Wheel alignment; castor adjustment 2006 xc70

Post by Rvolvos »

After replacing the front struts both castor angles are below 4 degrees. Alignment was still okay according to the alignment report.
Before this I replaced the Lower control arms and only the right side was at 3.9 degrees according to the alignment report.
Would trying to move the top of the struts back fix this?
2006 XC70 2.5T 238k


2012 S60T6 95k rip
2011 C30 T5 M66 105k Totalled RIP
2006 V70 2.5T 184k RIP
2011 C30 T5 AW55-50SN 99k sold

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5271
Joined: 15 January 2012
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Post by MoVolvos »

*
Instead of correction just make sure the toe (adjustable) and camber (slight play but not made to for adjustment) are within spec and test drive to see if it drives straight.

Almost no average cars these days have castor nor camber adjustments. You can get a concentric bolt for the strut for camber but that was not the factory's intent.

*
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

Rvolvos
Posts: 213
Joined: 1 April 2018
Year and Model: 2006 xc70
Location: Nevada
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post by Rvolvos »

Thanks for your response. According to the attached alignment report everything is within spec. Except the camber, they recommended a adjustment.
Attachments
210746DF-4647-4788-8A58-25E9C0279841.jpeg
2006 XC70 2.5T 238k


2012 S60T6 95k rip
2011 C30 T5 M66 105k Totalled RIP
2006 V70 2.5T 184k RIP
2011 C30 T5 AW55-50SN 99k sold

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5271
Joined: 15 January 2012
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Post by MoVolvos »

*
The car should drive pretty straight but might be a bit squirrely meaning can drift or dart left or right but going right more depending on the crown of the road. This is due to positive toe both front and rear. Everything for all intensive purposes are within spec and Castor is not really a tire wearing angle if you do mostly straight driving even then sorta negligible.

Some cars have rear toe adjustment but you should Zero the front toe or slightly negative but do center the steering wheel while doing so. As for the negative camber rears may not be adjustable. The front with a helper loosen the two steering knuckle strut bolts and pull the top of the tire outward and tighten. Should have a little play and will bring it closer to zero camber and less inner tire wear.

*
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

Rvolvos
Posts: 213
Joined: 1 April 2018
Year and Model: 2006 xc70
Location: Nevada
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post by Rvolvos »

Sorry I meant caster and not chamber.
The car does wanders a bit and requires quite a bit of steering input to keep straight.
The front wheels don’t have play but are still on the original ball joints and tie-rods. Was hoping if getting the castor within spec would help with keeping the car straight.
2006 XC70 2.5T 238k


2012 S60T6 95k rip
2011 C30 T5 M66 105k Totalled RIP
2006 V70 2.5T 184k RIP
2011 C30 T5 AW55-50SN 99k sold

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5271
Joined: 15 January 2012
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Post by MoVolvos »

Rvolvos wrote: 24 Apr 2021, 13:01 Sorry I meant caster and not chamber.
The car does wanders a bit and requires quite a bit of steering input to keep straight.
The front wheels don’t have play but are still on the original ball joints and tie-rods. Was hoping if getting the castor within spec would help with keeping the car straight.
When I read 3.9 in the OP I knew you were referencing Castor. The higher the "Even" Castor right and left the straighter the car will go. The car will pull to the higher Castor side so with yours it is fine as it will slightly compensate for the crown in the road and pull left (minuscule).

Toe is the main spec that determines how straight and stable a car will move straight. Camber pushes the car left or right but if even on both sides it's won't but affect cornering instead and tire wear depending how close it is to zero.

Again, the even Castor will not affect straight line but the Toe for your car. Set the front Toe to zero or slightly Toe In (Positive Toe) to help with going straight besides the wandering and/or darting left or right. When skiing having the ski Toe In helps you go straight. If too much however it will slow you down but in terms of the tire it will wear the outer edges.
*
Toe Alignment.png
Toe Alignment.png (126.04 KiB) Viewed 3262 times
*

Most cars have a slight negative camber in the rear and preferably zero in the front. As mentioned before too much will wear the edge of the tire inner (Negative) while outerwear (Positive). Unbolt the two strut nuts and pull the top of the tire outward (little movement / slop) to bring it closer to zero to help with the wandering and / or darting left and right.

*


*
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post