Login Register

03' V70 Buying Advice requested

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1961
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

03' V70 Buying Advice requested

Post by 850 LPT »

Hello All,

We are in search for a V70, which will serve as my daughters very first own car. I am trying to find her one and help her maintain it, but it will be her first car owning experience. The fact that she knows what she wants is great, now the search is on.

There is a well maintained, clean, one owner 03' V70 2.4T with 160k that we are looking at, but I need a little input from you experts as to see if this is a car we should possibly avoid.
I have always had the general notion in my mind to avoid years 01' and 02' for a bunch of reasons, and that the best years are 04' to 07'.

But what about 03's?

I tried to get a better picture by searching online and here, but there is not too much out there about this specific model year. Or maybe I'm missing it.

Can you give me some recommendations? Are these cars still plagued with tranny issues as the earlier years?

Thanks as always,

Dirk
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

cn90
Posts: 8249
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Post by cn90 »

I personally would look for 2004+ models with 100K miles or so.
They are around $3,000 to $5,000 range.
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

cn90
Posts: 8249
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Post by cn90 »

My experience with cars with >150k is not very good.
Expensive and/or time-consuming DIY stuffs (suspension,
bearings, rad, CV boots etc. etc.) start to pile up and it turns
out to be more expensive than the "100K mile car".
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

SOURDOUGHJIM
Posts: 136
Joined: 14 May 2023
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.4
Location: Missouri
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Post by SOURDOUGHJIM »

One thing I've noticed on this site on the older cars is rust. Seems to cause quite a lot of problems. I believe my '04 has spent its whole life in Nashville and has almost no rust underneath. So far, I enjoy driving it. Bought it in April of this year. Fuel mileage is good, parts are cheap. The V70 appears to have a very low center of gravity so it might be tough to turn it over in an accident. I see that a lot on dashcam videos with SUV's and crossovers.

User avatar
jonesg
Posts: 3501
Joined: 16 January 2008
Year and Model: 2004 V70
Location: Northern maine.
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 479 times

Post by jonesg »

have a mechanic do a pre purchase inspection. Get it up on a lift.
review the service records, timing belt should have been done,
i think 2003 should have had the tranny reprogrammed or replaced by dealer.

2 sets of keys is important.
run a carfax report.

don't get hung up on 1 car, theres lot of them come and go , see facebook and craigslistings.
personally i'd prefer a 2004+.

yanga001
Posts: 787
Joined: 24 March 2019
Year and Model: 98/99/00 v/s70’s
Location: Ontario
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by yanga001 »

Been told the best years were right before the engine change. Stick with the 2.5T engine for longevity purposes and aim for a 06-07 V/XC70 or an 07-09 S60. The newer engines had oil burn issues and thin cylinder walls from what ive been told. The 2.5T engine was an iterative improvement from the 1999 design if i recall correctly so you have up to 10 years of reliable design done.

Buy a handheld volvo scanner or use VIDA when you do your inspection. Some cars may have many codes but it is all battery related. Clear codes, do a thorough test drive and then check again. If no codes then most likely you have little issues.

BUDGET A TIMING BELT AND WATER PUMP CHANGE REGARDLESS.
1998 S70 N/A Auto (Parts car)(planned to be harvested)
1998 V70 N/A Auto New full restoration project (Water pump thrown at 404K Km)
1998 V70 N/A Auto (Workhorse) (Tree to driver B pillar :( )
1999 S70 T5 Auto(Project) (planned to be fixed)
2000 S70 SE M Learning platform (planned to be driven one day)
2008 S60 2.5T Auto (Sold)
2012 Honda Pilot AWD Touring (Daily)

User avatar
02V70
Posts: 358
Joined: 15 December 2021
Year and Model: 2002 V70XC
Location: California
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Post by 02V70 »

What is wrong with the '01 and '02 ones? Mine is an '02 with 280k miles, and it has been great.
2002 v70 X/C 288k miles

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35267
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1497 times
Been thanked: 3810 times

Post by abscate »

Nothing special about the 2003 to worry about. The CEM had a leakage recall for a plenum rubber upgrade , you should check to see if it has been done in service history if yOUR VIN is in the range.

The 2001 had neutral stop software that most had removed by the dealer, that was 2001 only.

P2s from CT tend to be owned by money amd brains folks who take care of their cars, good values.
There is a well maintained, clean, one owner 03' V70 2.4T with 160k that we are looking at, but I need a little input from you experts as to see if this is a car we should possibly avoid.
I have always had the general notion in my mind to avoid years 01' and 02' for a bunch of reasons, and that the best years are 04' to 07'.
Sounds like a great candidate. The 2005-2007 were a next gen P2 with a bit more robust CAN electronics but not a reason to eschew a 2003 in good shape. It’s probably had the timing belt done so you can drive it while bringing it to stage 0, especially if it is going to live outside VolvoDadSupport range

She will never be outside MVS-Support-Range
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

yanga001
Posts: 787
Joined: 24 March 2019
Year and Model: 98/99/00 v/s70’s
Location: Ontario
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by yanga001 »

02V70 wrote: 04 Dec 2023, 22:00 What is wrong with the '01 and '02 ones? Mine is an '02 with 280k miles, and it has been great.
Nothing is wrong with one that is well cared for. Something will likely be wrong with an older one that is being dumped.

Volvo went through a bit of an iterative design process as seen in the placement of the PEM modules in later years, the changes to how the rain sensing works, and the addition of an Aux port in 08 and bluetooth in 09. Again nothing wrong with the 01/02's, they do have some issues with transmissions but a later year on the cheap would be better.

Biggest thing for me is rust. I got an 08 with nearly zero rust on it, and have just finished rust proofing it. More damage will be done on a car that sees more winters without protection or cleaning.
1998 S70 N/A Auto (Parts car)(planned to be harvested)
1998 V70 N/A Auto New full restoration project (Water pump thrown at 404K Km)
1998 V70 N/A Auto (Workhorse) (Tree to driver B pillar :( )
1999 S70 T5 Auto(Project) (planned to be fixed)
2000 S70 SE M Learning platform (planned to be driven one day)
2008 S60 2.5T Auto (Sold)
2012 Honda Pilot AWD Touring (Daily)

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1961
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

Thanks everyone for your insight!

The way it looks right now there are three V70's that are good candidates located in our area: the 03' in question, plus an 04' with only 115k, and an 07' with 135k. I will be travelling to Boston on Saturday, meet with my daughter and then go check them out together. That's the tentative plan anyway.

All of the cars I see are in need of a TB replacement, which I will do myself. Plus, we are budgeting for whatever else comes up. I am prepared to do brakes, suspension work, tune ups and other stuff as well and as the need arises. From my experience there is not a single P2 Volvo out there doesn't need something. And that's fine as long as the vitals check out.

What irks me is that some dealers are hiding the fact that the cars need a TB, seemingly in hopes of finding a non suspecting buyer. Who then is in for a nasty surprise when they find out about the cost, or when it's too late and the TB fails.
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post