I have a 2002 V70 2.4T and love it
I just went and looked at a 2008 XC90 3.2. I test drive it and was sadly and surprisingly underwhelmed with the performance.
Is there something possibly wrong with that 3.2, or does the turbo just make that much difference?
It didn’t seem to skip or miss….it just was slow on acceleration.
Do I need to be looking for a V8 instead if I’m going to look at an XC90?
Thanks,
Jonboy
2.4T vs 3.2 performance
-
matthew1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14482
- Joined: 14 September 2002
- Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
- Location: Denver, Colorado, US
- Has thanked: 2656 times
- Been thanked: 1248 times
- Contact:
Yes. 9.1 0-60 vs. 7.0.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a1 ... road-test/
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a1 ... ve-review/
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a1 ... road-test/
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a1 ... ve-review/
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.
Also -> Amazon link. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!
1998 V70, no dash lights on
1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace
2004 V70 R [gone]
How to Thank someone for their post
Also -> Amazon link. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!
1998 V70, no dash lights on
1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace
2004 V70 R [gone]
How to Thank someone for their post
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post