Login Register

What did you do to your P2 Volvo today?

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: What did you do to your P2 Volvo today?

Post by dikidera »

There's a dilemma out there about the upper torque mount on the gasoline engines. Are you supposed to torque the center bolt as much as you possibly can, or should there be some slack to it? And should it be done on a running engine or not? The dilemma stems from the fact that the bolt hole for the upper torque mount is larger than the bolt itself, so someone out there said you aren't supposed to torque it completely so the bolt can move slightly in the hole itself.

I've personally done some experiments. If you tighten the nut while the engine has moved forwards(upwards if you look at it from the side), there is increased vibration but much less movement, giving way to a much more pleasant shifting. If I tighten it normally, with the engine being at rest, there is less vibration, but much more engine movement when giving it gas(flooring it from 0), slamming even.

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1961
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

dikidera wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 13:19 There's a dilemma out there about the upper torque mount on the gasoline engines. Are you supposed to torque the center bolt as much as you possibly can, or should there be some slack to it? And should it be done on a running engine or not? The dilemma stems from the fact that the bolt hole for the upper torque mount is larger than the bolt itself, so someone out there said you aren't supposed to torque it completely so the bolt can move slightly in the hole itself.

I've personally done some experiments. If you tighten the nut while the engine has moved forwards(upwards if you look at it from the side), there is increased vibration but much less movement, giving way to a much more pleasant shifting. If I tighten it normally, with the engine being at rest, there is less vibration, but much more engine movement when giving it gas(flooring it from 0), slamming even.
Well, this is eye opening for me. I replaced both the upper and the lower torque mounts on my daughters 03' V70 2.4T a while ago because they were shot, and I was baffled by the fact that there is now a lot of vibration going through the car while idling. Next time the car is here, I will take another look.
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

scot850
Posts: 14870
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1836 times
Been thanked: 1709 times

Post by scot850 »

Is there not a torque setting for the top mount?

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

vtl
Posts: 4724
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 605 times

Post by vtl »

Top mount bolt should be torqued well. Rubber it compressed should allow some movement. I torque it down with the engine is running. Can always switch to neutral on a long traffic light.

dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Post by dikidera »

I must say it was a shite job. 0/10 I wouldn't try again. The AW55 will not come out unless you significantly drop the engine down enough. And the biggest culprit was the torque converter which decided it will stay on the flywheel and as such you did not have enough space to overcome the rim of the torque converter as the AW55 was literally hitting the chassis.



Had the torque converter stayed on the transmission or in fact could come out of the flywheel, this wouldn't have been necessary. To make matters worse, part of the electrical installation for the oxygen sensors had caught itself in a very bad position and was pulled very hard I do hope it still works.

vtl
Posts: 4724
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 605 times

Post by vtl »

It is hard only the first time ;) I did like 3, the last one was easy-peasy.

dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Post by dikidera »

Would you say the TC must now be on the flywheel bolted down or on the transmissions when I am installing the new one?

vtl
Posts: 4724
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 605 times

Post by vtl »

dikidera wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:05 Would you say the TC must now be on the flywheel bolted down or on the transmissions when I am installing the new one?
Absolutely not. It is likely rusted to the flywheel. Make sure something catches it up, since it is heavy itself, plus contains about 2-3 liters of ATF, and start prying it off the flywheel gently. You don't want to damage the flywheel or you gonna replace it. Also clean the contact pads on the flywheel, it should mate to the TC absolutely flush.

vtl
Posts: 4724
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 605 times

Post by vtl »

Now you have the first hands experience with dropping transmission off, you understand how labor intensive it is. Now go ahead and replace the rear main seal :) Or at least be mentally ready that RMS will leak soon and you have to go all over this again.

dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Post by dikidera »

vtl wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:10
dikidera wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:05 Would you say the TC must now be on the flywheel bolted down or on the transmissions when I am installing the new one?
Absolutely not. It is likely rusted to the flywheel. Make sure something catches it up, since it is heavy itself, plus contains about 2-3 liters of ATF, and start prying it off the flywheel gently. You don't want to damage the flywheel or you gonna replace it. Also clean the contact pads on the flywheel, it should mate to the TC absolutely flush.
I meant when reinstalling the transmission. Should the torque converter be inside the transmission or should it first be bolted to the flywheel?

As for RMS, I am bad with seals , it will leak because of me, not be fixed by me 😀. Just ask the cam seals which didn't stop leaking after twice being replaced.

Btw, the flywheel is so bendy! I hope I didnt ruin it from the screwdriver I was pushing slightly to pry out the TC
Last edited by dikidera on 10 Mar 2025, 07:49, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post