Login Register

VS M4.4 tuning dead? Start again here?

How to go faster, stop quicker, and turn harder. Chips, exhaust, larger turbos, bigger/slotted/drilled rotors, high performance brake pads, manual boost controllers, performance shocks/struts/springs, airbox mods and more! Also discussion on HID and Xenon lights, aftermarket foglights and other exterior lighting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Chuck W  
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: VS M4.4 tuning dead? Start again here?

Post by Chuck W »

The US-spec 850s never had an immobilizer as far as I know.

As far as the map differences, I have no idea, as I don't have the -926 bin available to compare. I would imagine any of the 98MY M4.4 2.5L LPT ECUs will work. IIRC, the -460 and -459 are US-spec LPT MY98 ECUs. The 97MY -936 ECU would also probably work.|

100% P&P, I can't say, but a good chance at a yes on that. The only difference I can see might be EGR and whether donor car for the engine originally has the SAS system. Both you can defeat in the ECU with hardware mods.
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

LaSof
Posts: 3
Joined: 19 May 2025
Year and Model: 1988 Volvo 740
Location: France
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by LaSof »

Gonna put that theory to the test I guess. I managed to find a -936 ECU, so I'll try to plug that, see if it makes any difference. Might as well since my ECU (-926) is a pain in the backside to get an immo off for. I should get it in 2 weeks time, I'll report back here for all the Euro peeps. Here's hoping 😆

-LaSof

gwcook
Posts: 8
Joined: 18 August 2024
Year and Model: 1998 V70 R
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by gwcook »

Hey all,

Installed a wideband O2 sensor and put the 608_rev5b tune on the ECU, and besides max boost level, it seems to be driving perfectly and within the proper stoichiometric range which is awesome. Actually a little better from stops, as the car used to run lean when starting to move with the auto tune (~16), and now seems a bit rich (~13), which I assume is a sort of stall prevention mapping on the manual tune. Unfortunately, now I'm getting a DTC for the barometric pressure sensor - with the old (original) ECU installed, it reads perfectly within range (somewhere around 0.7v, I believe the proper range is 0.5v-4.5v). I thought maybe I had messed up when disabling the SAS pump diagnostics in TunerPro, but even without those modifications, the highest reading with the "tuned" ECU I am getting is 0.001v. Tested multiple times, and the sensor is receiving 5v on the proper pins from both ECUs, so the issue definitely has something to do with the way the new ECU is communicating with the sensor. The specific code I'm getting is EFI-422; any ideas of what's causing this odd value from the sensor? I'd really prefer to avoid disabling the sensor altogether as my drive down to college involves going through the Appalachians.


Edit: The ECU I have been tuning is from a N/A car (-743), and perusing this thread it seems like that may be the issue? I went for the cheapest one I could find on the m4.4 list on the m4.4 wiki which I had assumed meant it would work. Can anyone confirm or deny this is the probable cause before I drop ~$100 on an ECU from a turbo car (seems like that's the going rate for a turbo one).

Thanks,

Garrett
1998 V70 R (with an m66 from an '05 S40 T5 AWD)
Image
1983 BMW 633 CSi track car

User avatar
Chuck W  
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Post by Chuck W »

Pretty sure the NA M4.4 ECUs don't have any of the components populated on the board for the boost control. What are you doing for your boost control?
Whether this is also the source of your -422 code, but it is highly likely.

There is coverage of that code HERE on this site.

I would source a turbo ECU, regardless.
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

gwcook
Posts: 8
Joined: 18 August 2024
Year and Model: 1998 V70 R
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by gwcook »

Chuck W wrote: 07 Jul 2025, 07:42 Pretty sure the NA M4.4 ECUs don't have any of the components populated on the board for the boost control. What are you doing for your boost control?
Whether this is also the source of your -422 code, but it is highly likely.

There is coverage of that code HERE on this site.

I would source a turbo ECU, regardless.
Thanks for the response, Chuck!

For some reason, I assumed that any M4.4 ECU would work, so made no changes to any boost control hardware. I'm assuming if the ECU didn't have any boost control, that the rest of the boost control hardware on the car defaulted to a "limp home" setting, so allowed me to get around 3psi at WOT with some fun wastegate noises. Only took the car for a spin around the block so hopefully didn't do any damage to those components.

Was able to score a '98 R ECU on ebay for $50 so will now be using that as my base ECU for flashing, so I can still keep the original untuned ECU just in case. I'll post an update here if that fixes the issue.

Best,

Garrett
1998 V70 R (with an m66 from an '05 S40 T5 AWD)
Image
1983 BMW 633 CSi track car

S23
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 March 2025
Year and Model: 1997 Volvo S70 T5
Location: Warsaw

Post by S23 »

Has anyone of you added to the original M4.4 wideband e.g. AEM Uego for AFR control via motronic instead of the original lambda sensors? :)

User avatar
Chuck W  
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Post by Chuck W »

I've got a Spartan 2 on my '97 T5. I don't run an AFR gauge.

The general installation/mods to install a WBO2 are on the M4.4 Wiki.

I'm running one of VAST's WB Modulation bins on my car, but you can also just set things up to do general logging for tuning. That part is built into the .xdf for the 607/608 bins.
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

Turboforslund
Posts: 2
Joined: 26 October 2025
Year and Model: SC Volvo 850 T5 -95
Location: Sweden
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Turboforslund »

Hi guys!

Nice to see you starting something new, fresh and promising here. I really like the optimism and i'm happy to help out if needed! 😉

// Turboforslund

User avatar
Chuck W  
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Post by Chuck W »

Turboforslund wrote: 26 Oct 2025, 14:48 Hi guys!

Nice to see you starting something new, fresh and promising here. I really like the optimism and i'm happy to help out if needed! 😉

// Turboforslund
Glad to see you here. Your info and experience will be very valuable!
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

kingartur
Posts: 10
Joined: 27 October 2025
Year and Model: 1997 volvo 850
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 3 times

Post by kingartur »

Hello guys, does anyone have this file: 608_rev5b18PSINew.bin?

Thanks very much!

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post