Login Register

99 S70 T5 Why are the rear disks bigger than the fronts?

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
cn90
Posts: 8249
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Re: 99 S70 T5 Why are the rear disks bigger than the fronts

Post by cn90 »

Then prove it with photos for FRONT and REAR with measurement tape in the photos...
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

User avatar
dosbricks
Posts: 1116
Joined: 30 December 2004
Year and Model: '96 855, '98 S70
Location: South Texas
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dosbricks »

Tim, I went out and measured our S70 (not a T5) with a large machinist's caliper and the rear rotors were about 1/2" larger diameter than the fronts--most likely due to the aforementioned e-brake housed in the rear centers. However the pad contact surface is greater on the front squeezing on about the same width band on each rotor. So if we can extrapolate that front/rear engineering up from the S70 280mm fronts to the T5 302mm fronts, then it could make sense that your rear rotors are also larger diameter than the fronts.

Now all you guys need to hug and make up. :P
'98 S70, 230k, purchased new in '98
'96 855 GLT, 163k, purchased lightly used in '99
Onceuponatime RIP '69 Shelby GT500 w/7.0 liter

polskamafia mjl
Posts: 2640
Joined: 1 April 2009
Year and Model: 1995 Volvo 854 T-5R
Location: Hershey, PA
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by polskamafia mjl »

Yeah, this thread got really angry really fast. I thought only JRL could elicit such hostility. :P
'All my money is gone and I have an old Volvo.' - Bamse's Turbo Underpants

Current: 1995 Volvo 850 T-5R Manual - Bringing it back from the brink of death
Previous: 1996 Volvo 850 GLT - Totaled

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

dosbricks wrote:Tim, I went out and measured our S70 (not a T5) with a large machinist's caliper and the rear rotors were about 1/2" larger diameter than the fronts--most likely due to the aforementioned e-brake housed in the rear centers. However the pad contact surface is greater on the front squeezing on about the same width band on each rotor. So if we can extrapolate that front/rear engineering up from the S70 280mm fronts to the T5 302mm fronts, then it could make sense that your rear rotors are also larger diameter than the fronts.

Now all you guys need to hug and make up. :P
A handful of T5's had the "big brake kit" from the factory. Most were still just the standard 280mm.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
BEJinFbk
Posts: 4067
Joined: 5 January 2008
Year and Model: '98 V70 R
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 146 times

Post by BEJinFbk »

But aren't those kits just the fronts?
Never heard of anything special on the
back except the vented rotors on '00 R's.
'98 V70 R - Well Equipped for Life Up North... ;)

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

BEJinFbk wrote:But aren't those kits just the fronts?
Never heard of anything special on the
back except the vented rotors on '00 R's.
Yeah
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post