Login Register

1999 V70 Diesel Feedback on buying

Post Reply
User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 36142
Joined: 17 Feb 2013, 17:54
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 4064 times

Post by abscate »

You can buy Euro spec cars on the US tourist program btw. We might do this for our next car...when the BMW slusher hits 150
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

Blockpartie
Posts: 106
Joined: 23 May 2014, 10:12
Year and Model: ...
Location:

Post by Blockpartie »

misha wrote: Nope....it is pretty fast.The engine came from Audi and it was 5 cyl one turbocharged.There should be NO visible smoke because it's famous 2.5TDI engine with direct injection....not like old diesel engines like Blockpartie mentioned. :!:
These engines were used up to 2001 when new model of v70 started.With new model,there was still 5 cylinder 2.5 turbo diesel engine,but this time Volvo developed their own common rail diesel engine.From 2001 to today,Volvo have it's own 2.5 5cyl turbocharged engine marked as D5.

Good engine...even better than newer Audi's 2.5TDI V6.Volvo never used their v6 diesel because older 5cyl inline diesel was more reliable.
Have you ever driven one?
By comparison the 2,4L 10V is only marginally slower in terms of acceleration and nobody calls that car quick. It is an old diesel, nothing like todays diesels that run very smooth.
In addition there will always be visible smoke due to how everything is setup. I wasn't talking about giant clouds - hence my comment that "rolling coal" indicates and issue with service. To be more precise it indicates incorrect pump timing or some fault with the injectors.

The thing about the V6 is completely pointless and wrong. Volvo didn't use that engine because it didn't fit, not for realiability reasons.

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5437
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 16:09
Year and Model: 2010 Volvo S80 D5
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 432 times

Post by misha »

Yes i drove it. :wink:
Audi v6 diesels are just not reliable like old 5cyl inline diesels were.That's the fact....not my opinion.2.5 tdi v6 180hp with 6speed manual and dual exhaust(left and right side exhaust) is pretty fast...but older 5cyl diesels were better.
2010 S80 D5 / restyling / fully equipped / Twin turbo / Savile Gray Metallic (492)

History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1973
Joined: 27 May 2011, 08:05
Year and Model: 98' S70, 5-speed
Location: CT
Has thanked: 335 times
Been thanked: 247 times

Post by 850 LPT »

Blockpartie wrote:
misha wrote: Nope....it is pretty fast.The engine came from Audi and it was 5 cyl one turbocharged.There should be NO visible smoke because it's famous 2.5TDI engine with direct injection....not like old diesel engines like Blockpartie mentioned. :!:
These engines were used up to 2001 when new model of v70 started.With new model,there was still 5 cylinder 2.5 turbo diesel engine,but this time Volvo developed their own common rail diesel engine.From 2001 to today,Volvo have it's own 2.5 5cyl turbocharged engine marked as D5.

Good engine...even better than newer Audi's 2.5TDI V6.Volvo never used their v6 diesel because older 5cyl inline diesel was more reliable.
Have you ever driven one?
By comparison the 2,4L 10V is only marginally slower in terms of acceleration and nobody calls that car quick. It is an old diesel, nothing like todays diesels that run very smooth.
In addition there will always be visible smoke due to how everything is setup. I wasn't talking about giant clouds - hence my comment that "rolling coal" indicates and issue with service. To be more precise it indicates incorrect pump timing or some fault with the injectors.

The thing about the V6 is completely pointless and wrong. Volvo didn't use that engine because it didn't fit, not for realiability reasons.
misha has the facts right on this one. And NEVER compare a gasoline engine with a diesel. :roll:
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 148k miles
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 161k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

Blockpartie
Posts: 106
Joined: 23 May 2014, 10:12
Year and Model: ...
Location:

Post by Blockpartie »

I'm not arguing about reliability of the 5cyl vs the V6. This was all about the "why they didn't use it" -> because there was no space for a V6.

What facts are you people talking about?
850 2,5 TDI: 0-100Km/h in 9,9sec; 200Km/h topspeed*
850 2,5 10V: 0-100Km/h in 10,0sec; 205Km/h topspeed*
*for cars with manual transmission

Data source: Volvo pricelist 1996 and 1997

You always compare diesel and petrol engines when deciding on which one to purchase. Don't see any problem with that.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post