Of course not, it would be a 1.5 kG hammer by Thor....tardcart wrote: ↑20 Mar 2019, 07:56 speaking of Spinner and removing the pan, Is it really necessary to deface the undercarriage with a three pound maul like he does claiming thats what volvo tech would do in his video? I doubt a volvo tech would even own a three lb hammer. I assume if the undercarriage is dropped some amount that wouldn't be necessary?
1996 850 2.3T blown #2 Rod at 208k
- abscate
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 35275
- Joined: 17 February 2013
- Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
- Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
- Has thanked: 1500 times
- Been thanked: 3810 times
Re: 1996 850 2.3T blown #2 Rod at 208k
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
Actually I have seen that too. Not sure why it exists, good question?
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
-
tardcart
- Posts: 410
- Joined: 8 February 2019
- Year and Model: 96 850t. 93 940t
- Location: Pittstown Nj
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
I notice the IPD skid pan utilizes it for a mount. but the volvo one doesn't. I dont like to ruin the rust protection by cutting or bending it.
More salt every year here.
More salt every year here.
- Jazzer
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 8 May 2015
- Year and Model: 1996 850 Turbo
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Has thanked: 2 times
Ironically i put a new head gasket on it about 15k miles ago when I burned a few valves.
Here’s another question for y’all: is it possible to put a T5 turbo engine in place of the standard turbo? Just wondering, may want to do a little upgrade while I’m shopping for a used engine...
- WhatAmIDoing
- Posts: 965
- Joined: 30 July 2016
- Year and Model: 1998 S/V70 T5M
- Location: North America
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 105 times
AFAIK, An NA, low-pressure turbo, and high-pressure turbo engines should fit in all P80 chassis. One of the pros of modular design. Just make sure you grab the right ECU.
'98 S70 T5M - 323,000mi - awaiting heart transplant
'98 V70 T5M - 324,000mi - my new project
'99 S70 "AWD" - 220,000+mi - gone
Knows enough to be dangerous
'98 V70 T5M - 324,000mi - my new project
'99 S70 "AWD" - 220,000+mi - gone
Knows enough to be dangerous
-
tardcart
- Posts: 410
- Joined: 8 February 2019
- Year and Model: 96 850t. 93 940t
- Location: Pittstown Nj
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
none of the 2.4 or 2.5 t5 engines have the respect of the 2.3. they have More power stock but cant take any mods for performance with out blowing I think. all the cars you see on Nuerenburg speed day are 2.3 making 500 hp or more.
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
- Any high pressure turbo (HPT) engine 95-98 P80 drops right in. They are all the same engine, very very minor differences.
- HPT engines 99-06 get slightly little more tricky the newer you go, but have been done dozens of times and in stock form will work extremely well once fitted.
I'd look for a 95-98 HPT with low-ish miles, a good bet is a 98 T5. Use either turbo, the 16t from the 98 or the 15g from your 96, either will bolt right up and the ECU will not know the difference. But this is a good opportunity to drop in a 98 ECU, as well, to match the injectors on the 98 engine. Motronic 4.4 is a nice step up from Motronic 4.3; this is a seamless conversion.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
- RickHaleParker
- Posts: 7129
- Joined: 25 May 2015
- Year and Model: See Signature below.
- Location: Kansas
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 958 times
If you stick with a 2.3 turbo, no problem with switching any turbo from another 2.3.
All the 2.3 turbos are: Bore 81 mm, Stroke 90 mm, Compression ratio 8.5:1.
Just make sure you get the ECU also so, that it will have the correct map for the turbo.
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 2224 Views
-
Last post by manovlov
-
- 2 Replies
- 421 Views
-
Last post by jose456891






