Login Register

ECU SWAP from 850R to 850 T-5

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
osman
Posts: 405
Joined: 20 January 2012
Year and Model: 2002 c70 hardtop
Location: san marcos texas
Been thanked: 1 time

ECU SWAP from 850R to 850 T-5

Post by osman »

I have found a ECU from a 850R being parted out. I want to swap it into my stage 0 850 T-5.
Is there anything I am overlooking or should it just plug and play like other ECU swaps I have done.
I am interested in any thoughts, if you think I am a fool and I will destroy my motor or transmission then feel free to say so.
Has anyone else done this swap?
Do I need to swap the transmission ECM too?
Let me know.
Brick Life
2003 Saab 9-5 ARC V6 3.0 Turbo 120K SwagWagon
97 850R wagon mileage unknown
2000 C70 Turbo Convertible 110K
99 XC70 AWD LPT 115
98 BMW 328IS 130K M3 Wheels
94 Mercedes 420E 160K
Kiwi bluetooth/Torq Pro app VOL-FCR/VAG-COM USB cable

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

In general they will swap fine but the model year matters a lot. For example all 95 R models had EGR, most 96 don't, so a 95 R ECU may throw a CEL in your 96.

What year ECU?
Do the cars both have/lack EGR?
Do the cars both have/lack SAS?
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
osman
Posts: 405
Joined: 20 January 2012
Year and Model: 2002 c70 hardtop
Location: san marcos texas
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by osman »

Yes they are the same years (96) but yes I used an ECU from a 850 with an EGR in a 97 850 without EGR and an SAS and it ran fine just threw the EGR code.
thanks for the input.
Brick Life
2003 Saab 9-5 ARC V6 3.0 Turbo 120K SwagWagon
97 850R wagon mileage unknown
2000 C70 Turbo Convertible 110K
99 XC70 AWD LPT 115
98 BMW 328IS 130K M3 Wheels
94 Mercedes 420E 160K
Kiwi bluetooth/Torq Pro app VOL-FCR/VAG-COM USB cable

User avatar
osman
Posts: 405
Joined: 20 January 2012
Year and Model: 2002 c70 hardtop
Location: san marcos texas
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by osman »

I was mostly concerned if the extra HP i am expecting will somehow be too much for my drivetrain/motor etc.
Brick Life
2003 Saab 9-5 ARC V6 3.0 Turbo 120K SwagWagon
97 850R wagon mileage unknown
2000 C70 Turbo Convertible 110K
99 XC70 AWD LPT 115
98 BMW 328IS 130K M3 Wheels
94 Mercedes 420E 160K
Kiwi bluetooth/Torq Pro app VOL-FCR/VAG-COM USB cable

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

It's the same motor/transmission/turbo between both of them; just different programming between the "R". Really, it's only a 18 hp difference at very top end, and you're probably not going to notice a difference below 4000 RPM.

But yeah, the car can handle it.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
osman
Posts: 405
Joined: 20 January 2012
Year and Model: 2002 c70 hardtop
Location: san marcos texas
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by osman »

So the HP boost is only in the high end, huh?
Honestly I dont drive my car anywhere near 4000 rpms.
I just figured since I had an 850r ECU available it would be alot cheaper than upgrading my own ECU.
Brick Life
2003 Saab 9-5 ARC V6 3.0 Turbo 120K SwagWagon
97 850R wagon mileage unknown
2000 C70 Turbo Convertible 110K
99 XC70 AWD LPT 115
98 BMW 328IS 130K M3 Wheels
94 Mercedes 420E 160K
Kiwi bluetooth/Torq Pro app VOL-FCR/VAG-COM USB cable

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

Yep. If you look at the torque numbers, etc. the R's are exactly the same - which makes sense! It's the same engine with the same turbo.

The R's had a different exhaust manifold, along with the ECU programming to allow "overboost" for up to 30 seconds, to net a little more power in the top end of the engine. It is, after all, supposed to be the "performance" model. Honestly, you will probably not even notice a difference between well-taken care of T5 and an R at this age.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
osman
Posts: 405
Joined: 20 January 2012
Year and Model: 2002 c70 hardtop
Location: san marcos texas
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by osman »

Thats good to know. I was thinking as if an ECU from a 850R was like the "holy grail" of performance.
Im reconsidering the ECU swap now that I realize the negligible difference I might get.
Has anyone done this swap?
Brick Life
2003 Saab 9-5 ARC V6 3.0 Turbo 120K SwagWagon
97 850R wagon mileage unknown
2000 C70 Turbo Convertible 110K
99 XC70 AWD LPT 115
98 BMW 328IS 130K M3 Wheels
94 Mercedes 420E 160K
Kiwi bluetooth/Torq Pro app VOL-FCR/VAG-COM USB cable

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14466
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2652 times
Been thanked: 1242 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

I put into my '97 T5 a '96 R ECU a couple months ago. No difference, but I had a MBC on her already. As I understand it, the R ECU will allow higher boost before fuel cutoff, but like I said, I wasn't reaching that point before, so there is no real-world difference for me.

I think the best benefit to having two ECUs is that you can send one off to be re-flashed and still drive your Volvo.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

The only issue with swapping these ECUs is the SAS and the EGR, and the CELs that might result. If you don't care about driving around with the CEL on, then just ignore that and drop it in.

From your post I interpreted that you wanted to know what will work long term, not whether the R ECU would give your car some kind of performance gain. In that case, from what you have posted about your car, there is really no point. The R ECU has minimal (but real) differences with respect to performance anyway.

If there is a "holy grail" it is an ECU tuned to match your car's current setup and performance goals. ARD tuning is the current favorite in the community. And you can use a T-5 or R ECU, it doesn't matter, they are completely interchangeable as far as a base for tuning.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post