The fight has just begun.
Are there any engineers out there that I could bounce ideas off of to explain the no-code problems. If so e-mail me direct, [email protected] The only real victory that CARB got for us is for Volvo to publically admit that there is a major problem with the ETM.
Points we have to prove;
A replacement without a robust 'life-of-the-car' ETM is no victory, it is really a slap in the face. We need to show a circumstance that proves that not all failure show a code. The Ford/Firestone fiasco was replacing tires with no problem other than the name on the sidewall, and they were not replacing them with the same tire, they were replacing with a tire of a different design. We need a different design.
A refund limited to $1,000 is a slap on the other cheek. Is this per incident or per car? Some have already been out the cost of 2 or more ETMs.
Keep the failure reports going to NHTSA. The warranty extension, coming from the California Air Resources Board, is only for pollution. NHTSA is only concerned with safety.
I guess we will have to wait until the final document, possibly in the form of a Technical Service Bulletin, comes out in December.
VEXED says there are too many no-code problems.
-
DonWillson
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 31 October 2005
- Year and Model: 2000 V70XC
- Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
VEXED says there are too many no-code problems.
Announcing my affiliation with XeMODeX, Inc. as Internet correspondent and consultant to Volvophiles needing help with failing ETMs. See http://FixYourETM.com. For the full history of this problem see http://VEXEDvolvo.org
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post






