Login Register

Valvoline Maxlife 3309 vs. Toyota Type-IV

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Valvoline Maxlife 3309 vs. Toyota Type-IV

Post by oragex »

I'd like to give a feedback on this Valvoline ATF oil with the 3309 specification. I have been using it for one year in my Aisin transmission. I had a strange situation where I measured the right way the level during the summer, then on very cold days during the winter the level was so low, the car didn't move when put in D with a cold engine. There are no transmission leaks, which makes me think this oil is shrinking/expanding much more than other brands depending on the outdoor temperature.

I just recently flushed the Valvoline oil and went back to the Toyota Type-IV oil. The transmission has now a more 'composed' and smooth shifting.

As a conclusion, I would not use this Valvoline ATF oil again. The price difference with the Toyota or Mobil 3309 oils is not that big, and these oils - the Toyota and the Mobil 3309 - seem to give a better transmission operation.

What is also interesting, is that the new Valvoline bottle, as well as the Valvoline site, doesn't mention any more the 3309 specification. When I bought it one year ago, both the site and the bottle were mentioning the 3309 norm. The new bottle only mentions compatibility with the Toyota Type-IV norm.
MAXLIFE-DECMERC-ATF.jpg
MAXLIFE-DECMERC-ATF.jpg (40.3 KiB) Viewed 5497 times
Dec Merc.jpg

vtl
Posts: 4727
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 606 times

Post by vtl »

The only major difference is viscosity: Maxlife is more towards Toyota WS than JWS3309. Also it can't shrink that much to cause pump starvation.

I tried to go back to Mobil 3309 (more viscous) in my XC70, transmission shifted worse with it. Wife's V70 with reman'ed valve body does not care if it's 3309 or Idemitsu or Valvoline. There's even no change in shift quality if ATF is replaced gradually. I guess, I'll replace worn VB in XC70 this spring/summer.

Also Maxlife does not change color that quick as other mineral based ATFs do.

jimmy57
Posts: 6694
Joined: 12 November 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70R GT, et al
Location: Ponder Texas
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 320 times

Post by jimmy57 »

I have been working on cars for more than 40 years. Auto trans fluid checking still bites me in the butt every now and then. Your problem was dipstick tube suction that pulls fluid up in the tube giving a false high reading. It happens when you pull dipstick, wipe it, re-insert and then pull it again to read. when you pull it out the dipstick can catch for an instant and when it release it "burps" fluid up into the tube and is splashes up on the dipstick.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post