I think there needs to be some legislation to force car companies to fully remove immobilizers at the request of the owner, an min cost.
And after a car hits 10 years old, give the ability for the owner to fully disable it.
It is an immense cost if you think about all the time and effort of people with all types and brands of cars the amount of money being spent on keys, chips , immobilizer repair, errors and codes, stuck on the road events, and just general problems with cars that have theft systems preventing their owners from using the cars.
There is no other product produced today that has a feature that cannot be removed that causes the product to become worthless.
Let me know what you think
My thoughts are, universal ECU, with adapter plugs, programmable to any number of cylinders, can be used to upgrade motors, replace motors, and fully remove any theft system at will.
Immobilizer general discussion
-
PS78
- Posts: 186
- Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 09:46
- Year and Model: 2000 S70
- Location: Northeast PA
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
I agree with you on pretty much everything you stated. The trend seems to be more and more of the same with other companies following suit. Honestly it kind of comes down to the question, who really is the owner of the vehicle?
Always first off the line, while all the cool people are still staring at their phones.
-
cn90
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: 31 Mar 2010, 09:54
- Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
- Location: Omaha NE
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 504 times
If the rest of the world is honest and doesn't steal, then there is no need for immobilizer.
The Immobilization system was invented b/c people steal!
I agree that the owner should be able to disable the system at his/her own wish.
Some car immobilization systems are very robust, lasting the life of the car, some other vehicles are just headache.
The Immobilization system was invented b/c people steal!
I agree that the owner should be able to disable the system at his/her own wish.
Some car immobilization systems are very robust, lasting the life of the car, some other vehicles are just headache.
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+
-
j-dawg
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 20 Apr 2013, 10:56
- Year and Model: 1999 V70 T5
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
I used to own a Nissan Maxima, which was, for a time, a hot target for theft. The 99+ cars came with immobilizers. You can look up the stats on the NHTSA website - the 99 Maximae are stolen at about half the frequency (relative to production numbers) of the 98s.
Our cars are not such hot commodities, but the device certainly serves a purpose.
Our cars are not such hot commodities, but the device certainly serves a purpose.
1999 V70 T5 5-SPD | ~277k mi | sold
-
PS78
- Posts: 186
- Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 09:46
- Year and Model: 2000 S70
- Location: Northeast PA
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
I'm curious as to how the incorporation of android and apple products will affect theft considering their advertised abilities to control vehicle systems currently such as unlocking doors, starting engines etc. That convenience may very well become a weak security point. As for the transponder keys, there has been a good response from the aftermarket with duplication and programming for a pretty broad range of makes and models.
Always first off the line, while all the cool people are still staring at their phones.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 14 Replies
- 4776 Views
-
Last post by abscate
-
- 16 Replies
- 5129 Views
-
Last post by beigg
-
- 25 Replies
- 9983 Views
-
Last post by pgill
-
- 38 Replies
- 12184 Views
-
Last post by mrbrian200
-
- 36 Replies
- 9810 Views
-
Last post by erikv11






