Login Register

Should I man-up and just fold, Or get a new manifold?

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
Oro
Posts: 111
Joined: 29 September 2020
Year and Model: V70 XC, XC70+S60 awd
Location: Seattle-ish
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Should I man-up and just fold, Or get a new manifold?

Post by Oro »

I'm under all this archived peer-pressure to get a new exhaust manifold. I don't think I need to when I really go over it in my head, but I'm not an expert at this. Unlike I am with the writings of Joseph Heller (embedded joke below).

Car is 119k mile 2000 V70 XC. Great condition, all thoroughly gone-through the last year. Stage 0 to the nines and also rebuilt brakes, suspension mods. Ready for more power.

Coming: 16t turbo, Snabb intake, and an Upsolute tune. No other mods as I've done a lot of research already and the bang/buck curve fails on things like a RIP kit, 3" exhaust, etc. The last remaining question is the exhaust manifold as it's not huge bucks, but is huge hassle.

Do I really need to put in a Japanifold or other manifold? I ask as it greatly increases the hassle/work (which I will be doing myself, not farming out). I had lined up a 2.5t/"R" manifold but it was warped. I CAN track down another one at modest cost, or pay up for a Japanifold, but do I REALLY need to? Honestly? What will it really get me?

I don't care for maximum horsepower from this car. I like the handling, interior and exterior are quite nice. I do dislike the low gearing (in 1st and 2nd) on the AW 4-speed vs. the later 5-speed in a mature 2004+ P2 2.5t, which really hurts it. The poor gearing in the 4 speed really hurt these cars off the line, but have absolutely no effect over 35mph. Upsolute says the flash tune is worth taking it from roughly 200hp/200 ft/lbs to 225/260, that's stock without the intake mod and 16t upgrade. I figure from research those will help me be happy. For reference, the 2004+ numbers are ~210/235. I am mainly concerned about torque to get the P80 4-speed to feel close to the mature P2 in the lowest gears and run a little freer up high. I think the tune, 16t and a better intake (which is a serious choke point from the smart people I have listened to, not my own personal experience) are the key.

So here's the real question: Do I REALLY need to also change the exhaust manifold with the attendant hassle, or do you think I can just leave the stock 2000 manifold on and be happy? The car is relatively low mileage, no reason I feel the need to change the manifold, and I am not looking for maximum HP or torque. I am just looking for a big enough bump to make the 2000 V70 XC feel equal to or a smidge better than the 2004-2007 lpt 2.5t. If I leave the manifold in place (and hot side of the turbo), it makes the swap SOO much easier.

If on the other hand, a 2.5t/"R" manifold or japanifold makes a big difference all on it's lonesome (which I doubt), or in combination (I don't know), then I'm listening.

Somewhat sleepless on this subject in Seattle,

I am yours in Christ,
Capt. A.T. Tappman,
Chaplain, U.S. Army

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35332
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1511 times
Been thanked: 3829 times

Post by abscate »

The stock XC exhaust manifold is pretty good and I would leave it in. If you don’t have Dyno results on mods, improvements are usually virtual. What is a sane Volvo owner to do in this insane world of mods?
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
Sveedy
Posts: 2073
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 96 850 Turbo
Location: N. Arizona
Has thanked: 418 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Post by Sveedy »

I'd stick with your stock exhaust manifold. I believe they are better than the original 850 type, which was prone to cracking.
That said, replacing the exhaust manifold is not difficult at all, particularly if you already have the turbo out.
Try to learn life's bad lessons vicariously through others.


1996 850 Turbo GLH ( Goes Like Hell )
1999 V70 GLT

scot850
Posts: 14909
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1858 times
Been thanked: 1718 times

Post by scot850 »

They are not to hard to fit, except on an AWD turbo. Angle gear and turbo pipes make it much more challenging. Unless there is an issue I would leave the manifold alone.

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14502
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2664 times
Been thanked: 1256 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

Manifolds are pretty far down the cost/benefit list when you're starting at Stage 0.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

Oro
Posts: 111
Joined: 29 September 2020
Year and Model: V70 XC, XC70+S60 awd
Location: Seattle-ish
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Post by Oro »

Alright, that's good news to my ears. I was leaning this way and just did not see a big upside to the hassle. When I thought I had a good 2.5t/R manifold for basically free, it seemed worth it. But sourcing another + the hassle around the awd unit just seemed to greatly diminish it.

This will make it a lot easier and maybe I'll have it done by Christmas!

scot850
Posts: 14909
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1858 times
Been thanked: 1718 times

Post by scot850 »

The XC motor is tuned to give more low down torque. So this may actually be to your advantage anyway. If you want to change it down the line for giggles, then do it then once you have some run time under your belt. Still don't think it is worth it unless you are planning a lot of high speed driving.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

Oro
Posts: 111
Joined: 29 September 2020
Year and Model: V70 XC, XC70+S60 awd
Location: Seattle-ish
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Post by Oro »

scot850 wrote: 11 Dec 2021, 16:18 The XC motor is tuned to give more low down torque. So this may actually be to your advantage anyway.
Good point.

Is there anything else I should change, like oil or coolant hoses to it? I've not seen any leaks or evidence of, but I haven't poked around down there a whole lot. The cars clean with a relatively modest 119k on it, but it any lines down there are 21 years old at this point. I will replace the turbo hoses with silicone at a minimum. They all work fine and the TVC is new, but I figure I might as well if I am in there.

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5279
Joined: 15 January 2012
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 312 times
Been thanked: 525 times

Post by MoVolvos »

Oro wrote: 11 Dec 2021, 16:26
scot850 wrote: 11 Dec 2021, 16:18 The XC motor is tuned to give more low down torque. So this may actually be to your advantage anyway.
Good point.

Is there anything else I should change, like oil or coolant hoses to it? I've not seen any leaks or evidence of, but I haven't poked around down there a whole lot. The cars clean with a relatively modest 119k on it, but it any lines down there are 21 years old at this point. I will replace the turbo hoses with silicone at a minimum. They all work fine and the TVC is new, but I figure I might as well if I am in there.
Unlike a timing belt that is changed 2 or 3 times the life of the car you'll never touch those, so do it while you are in there as you'll pay later :( if any of those hoses go.

*
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

scot850
Posts: 14909
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1858 times
Been thanked: 1718 times

Post by scot850 »

As our friend MoVolvos says, if you have the opportunity and are swapping the turbo, especially on the AWD cars, is the time to swap anything in the back of the engine. So any rubber hoses like the coolant hoses to the turbo, and seals on the oil lines. Maybe even the heater hoses while you have the room. Then hopefully you won't have to access that area again for a very long time!

Goo Luck!

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post