I don't think it's such a good idea to run a straight weight oil on a car engine. It'd provide very little protection at startup.robert213 wrote:http://www.volvocars.us/_Tier2/Owners/Library.htm
Castrol GTX Straight 30W, if you live where temp is above 0C/32F
what engine oil u use?
-
White850Turbo
- Posts: 923
- Joined: 11 April 2004
- Year and Model:
- Location: Plano, TX
-Sean
1995 850 Turbo (Extensively Modded)
1998 S70 T5 (Almost Stock)
1995 850 Turbo (Extensively Modded)
1998 S70 T5 (Almost Stock)
-
MadeInJapan
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 13434
- Joined: 31 March 2005
- Year and Model: '98 S70 T5 '07S40T5
- Location: Knoxville, TN American but born in Japan
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
We don't see Esso oil here in the States...it may exist in a few states, but I've never seen it.
'98 S70 T5 Emrld Grn Met/Beige Tons of Upgrades Mobil-1
'04 V70 2.5T Red/Taupe Some Upgrades Mobil-1
'07 S40 T5 AWD 6 speed manual! Silver/Black Stage1 Heico & Elevate
'07 S60 2.5T Blue/Taupe- my kid's Volvo
'04 V70 2.5T Red/Taupe Some Upgrades Mobil-1
'07 S40 T5 AWD 6 speed manual! Silver/Black Stage1 Heico & Elevate
'07 S60 2.5T Blue/Taupe- my kid's Volvo
hard to get esso oil there?
maybe marketing strategy of exxon mobil... USA market demand is fill with Mobil 1.maybe.
same also in malaysia. eventho got both mobil and esso, but through the advertising campaign, Mobil 1 is well accepted and regarded as high class oil. some local oil experts say that esso & mobil synthetic not much different because both are exxon mobil products. again, i think this is marketing strategy...i highly believe that both have very identical quality or maybe same quality. for those are willing to pay more,they opt for mobil 1. esso ultron synthetic is slightly cheaper with good quality also.
in conclusion, why pay more for mobil 1 when esso ultron offers same class oil at cheaper price.
maybe marketing strategy of exxon mobil... USA market demand is fill with Mobil 1.maybe.
same also in malaysia. eventho got both mobil and esso, but through the advertising campaign, Mobil 1 is well accepted and regarded as high class oil. some local oil experts say that esso & mobil synthetic not much different because both are exxon mobil products. again, i think this is marketing strategy...i highly believe that both have very identical quality or maybe same quality. for those are willing to pay more,they opt for mobil 1. esso ultron synthetic is slightly cheaper with good quality also.
in conclusion, why pay more for mobil 1 when esso ultron offers same class oil at cheaper price.
-
robert213
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 19 August 2005
- Year and Model:
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Been thanked: 1 time
My other car is a 1985 Mitsubishi Starion, which I bought new from the dealership. It now has 200K miles with original engine and turbo. I did a lot of reading about oils back in the Eighties.White850Turbo wrote: I don't think it's such a good idea to run a straight weight oil on a car engine. It'd provide very little protection at startup.
With conventional multi-weight oils, the lower number is the weight of oil. The higher number is accomplished by the use of additives. In other words, 10W30 may be something like 25% straight 10W oil and 75% additives to act like 30W oil. Also, 10W40 may be something like 15% straight 10W oil and 85% additives to act like 40W oil.
Everyone knows what happens when these additives start flowing thru a super hot turbo. The additives begin to coke up and cause the turbo oil feed lines to clog.
With conventional straight 30W oil, you have mostly straight 30W oil with some additives only for cleansing. Therefore, there is less additives to cause a problem with coking-up.
I only use conventional 10W30 oil in a turbo-ed engine when outside temps drop down below 32F. I have used mostly straight 30W oil during the life of my Starion.
Of course, the problem with additives in conventional oil is the primary argument for the use of synthetic oil in turbo-charged engines.
- Tsquared
- Posts: 519
- Joined: 17 August 2003
- Year and Model: 11 C30
- Location: Atlanta GA
- Has thanked: 1 time
Sorry, but I have to call Bull$hit on that one. You need to do your research again. Start by going here:robert213 wrote: With conventional multi-weight oils, the lower number is the weight of oil. The higher number is accomplished by the use of additives. In other words, 10W30 may be something like 25% straight 10W oil and 75% additives to act like 30W oil. Also, 10W40 may be something like 15% straight 10W oil and 85% additives to act like 40W oil.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com
For the viscosity numbers you need to do a google on "ASTM Method D 2270". This is the methodology of rating the oil.
T2
'11 C30 T5
'96 854 - died an early death with 184K miles. Killed by the front end of an LTD on a suicide mission (T-boned and both cars totaled).
'96 854 - died an early death with 184K miles. Killed by the front end of an LTD on a suicide mission (T-boned and both cars totaled).
-
robert213
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 19 August 2005
- Year and Model:
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Been thanked: 1 time
My description of multi-weight oil and additives is over simplified for explanation purposes only. Back when turbo-charged engines first appeared in the eighties, car magazines published several articles on oil and its use in turbo-charged engines. All of the articles agreed that straight weight oil was better suited for turbo-charged engines than multi-weight oils. These articles strongly advised against the use of 10W40 in any turbo-charged engine.Tsquared wrote: Sorry, but I have to call Bull$hit on that one. You need to do your research again.
I wish that I kept these magazines. I threw them away during my move from Chicago to Indianapolis.
- Tsquared
- Posts: 519
- Joined: 17 August 2003
- Year and Model: 11 C30
- Location: Atlanta GA
- Has thanked: 1 time
Again, do the research. Your premise that lower viscosity number is the base oil and the higher number is achieved by additives and that the additives are 75% of the oil are incorrect.
I would have like to have seen those articles about strait weight oil. The three turbo powered performance cars I have owned, 83 Dodge Colt, 86 Buick Grand National, and my current 89 Porsche 944T, all recommended multi-weight oil and also had the addendum that synthetic was preferred. Your 1985 Mitsubishi Starion probably has the addendum.
As far as turbo coking it is typically due to neglecting to let the turbo cool enough prior to shut down. The coking issue has been a problem with the exhaust turbo design since it was first utilized in 1925. You can check the Borg Warner Turbo history for this...
I would have like to have seen those articles about strait weight oil. The three turbo powered performance cars I have owned, 83 Dodge Colt, 86 Buick Grand National, and my current 89 Porsche 944T, all recommended multi-weight oil and also had the addendum that synthetic was preferred. Your 1985 Mitsubishi Starion probably has the addendum.
As far as turbo coking it is typically due to neglecting to let the turbo cool enough prior to shut down. The coking issue has been a problem with the exhaust turbo design since it was first utilized in 1925. You can check the Borg Warner Turbo history for this...
'11 C30 T5
'96 854 - died an early death with 184K miles. Killed by the front end of an LTD on a suicide mission (T-boned and both cars totaled).
'96 854 - died an early death with 184K miles. Killed by the front end of an LTD on a suicide mission (T-boned and both cars totaled).
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post






