A bad mass airflow sensor can do weird things.
We had one on our Buick that would run like crap under 1/2 throttle, but was fine above that. The low RPM stumbling may very well still have to do with that.
98 S70 t5 missing after replacing cps., P0300 etc
-
jblackburn
- MVS Moderator
- Posts: 14043
- Joined: 8 June 2008
- Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
- Location: Alexandria, VA
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: 98 S70 t5 missing after replacing cps., P0300 etc
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier
A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."
mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!
Still havent made it back to check the codes again. Earlier today I drove it about 8 miles & when I went to leave it wouldn't start. It would act like it would try to run, & then just stall as it did the one time before. It was acting like it wasnt getting fuel so I cycles the key a couple times & cranked it & floored the accelerator & it fired up & seemed to run fine & only cut out a couple times on the way home. Also now I can't get it to cut out in park anymore around 1800rpm. Could this possibly be a fuel pressure regulator issue??
Also when i scan it & it has any MAF codes i will replace it. Just beginning to think this could be a fueling issue.
Also when i scan it & it has any MAF codes i will replace it. Just beginning to think this could be a fueling issue.
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
I know this was suggested over a week ago, but what happened when you tried this, do you remember?jblackburn wrote: Unplug the mass airflow sensor (engine off) and see if it runs any better.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
It runs fine without a MAF because the ECU is running the default air:fuel mixture. I wouldn't run 500 mile days without a MAF, you are guaranteed the car is either running rich (not so bad) or lean (potentially very bad) all the time. Not a good solution for long-term.
Get a Bosch or Volvo MAF, don't waste your time with any other brand.
Get a Bosch or Volvo MAF, don't waste your time with any other brand.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 7 Replies
- 890 Views
-
Last post by h20ham
-
- 0 Replies
- 375 Views
-
Last post by Conrad Birdie






