Login Register

98 S70 t5 missing after replacing cps., P0300 etc

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: 98 S70 t5 missing after replacing cps., P0300 etc

Post by jblackburn »

A bad mass airflow sensor can do weird things.

We had one on our Buick that would run like crap under 1/2 throttle, but was fine above that. The low RPM stumbling may very well still have to do with that.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

BRONCMAN
Posts: 24
Joined: 7 February 2011
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T-5 auto
Location: Idaho

Post by BRONCMAN »

Still havent made it back to check the codes again. Earlier today I drove it about 8 miles & when I went to leave it wouldn't start. It would act like it would try to run, & then just stall as it did the one time before. It was acting like it wasnt getting fuel so I cycles the key a couple times & cranked it & floored the accelerator & it fired up & seemed to run fine & only cut out a couple times on the way home. Also now I can't get it to cut out in park anymore around 1800rpm. Could this possibly be a fuel pressure regulator issue??

Also when i scan it & it has any MAF codes i will replace it. Just beginning to think this could be a fueling issue.

steve850
Posts: 127
Joined: 1 July 2009
Year and Model: XC70, 2004 and 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by steve850 »

My 840 did exactly that, was a vacuum line off the air intake next to the airbox.
Steve in Montreal

2010 XC70 3.2 N/A
04 XC70 2.5T
96 850 Platinum

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

jblackburn wrote: Unplug the mass airflow sensor (engine off) and see if it runs any better.
I know this was suggested over a week ago, but what happened when you tried this, do you remember?
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

BRONCMAN
Posts: 24
Joined: 7 February 2011
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T-5 auto
Location: Idaho

Post by BRONCMAN »

Runs fine with the MAF sensor unplugged. Just reduced power. Looks like I need a new one. I'm actually surprised it runs as well as it does without the MAF plugged in. Just drove it 550 miles today.

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

It runs fine without a MAF because the ECU is running the default air:fuel mixture. I wouldn't run 500 mile days without a MAF, you are guaranteed the car is either running rich (not so bad) or lean (potentially very bad) all the time. Not a good solution for long-term.

Get a Bosch or Volvo MAF, don't waste your time with any other brand.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post