Login Register

1996 850 Wagon Non-Turbo How to Maximize Gas Mileage?

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
PeteB
Posts: 880
Joined: 27 May 2014
Year and Model: 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
Location: Connecticut, USA
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 11 times

1996 850 Wagon Non-Turbo How to Maximize Gas Mileage?

Post by PeteB »

My son bought his 850 a few years ago, has been putting about 2000 miles
per month on it, and constantly complains about the gas mileage. He knows
about driving very gently, slower the better on the highway and I've given
him literature on hypermiling. I don't think he's going to improve his driving
at all. I wouldn't doubt if he still goes 65 MPH or so when in a hurry. It is
mostly highway miles.

I've also stressed keeping the tires inflated to the max allowable pressure.

We've checked and don't have any issues with brake pad drag - it did in the past.

I'm going to get a used engine splash guard to hopefully make it more aerodynamic,
it was missing when we bought the car.

I just fixed the odometer so that he can finally keep track of his actual mileage.

We were wondering if there are any aerodynamic add ons, or ECU chip upgrades
or anything else that is effective.

We run Valvoline High Mileage dino 10W-30 oil and are considering going to full
synthetic 5W-40 since I've read that this can help a bit and to get down to 2 or 3
oil changes per year.

We know that the engine always starts fine, runs fine and does not give any CEL
codes. I've seen Robert in his videos use some sort of monitor to see more about
how the ECU and engine are running. Is there a preferred model for this to see
lean/rich conditions, etc?
It idles at 1000 RPM which seems a bit high, is this abnormal?
Last edited by PeteB on 20 Mar 2016, 14:48, edited 2 times in total.

tryingbe
Posts: 1893
Joined: 18 June 2009
Year and Model: None
Location: Mesa, AZ, USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times

Post by tryingbe »

Turbo or non turbo? What MPG? Please don't give us miles per tank.
85 GLH, 367 whp
00 Insight, 72 mpg

User avatar
matthew1
Site Admin
Posts: 14481
Joined: 14 September 2002
Year and Model: 850 T5, 1997
Location: Denver, Colorado, US
Has thanked: 2655 times
Been thanked: 1248 times
Contact:

Post by matthew1 »

Stage 0 items are the End All Be All of MPG. Only strange statistical outliers outside of those procedures can account for missing MPG, like a bad wheel hub bearing, or a skipped timing belt tooth.
Help keep MVS on the web -> click sponsors' links here on MVS when you buy from them.

Also -> Amazon link
. Click that when you go to buy something on Amazon and MVS gets a cut!

1998 V70, no dash lights on

1997 850 T5 [gone] w/ MSD ignition coil, Hallman manual boost controller, injectors, R bumper, OMP strut brace

2004 V70 R [gone]

How to Thank someone for their post

Image

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

The things I looked into on my car when the mpg was pretty low, in this order: restricted fuel injector flow (varnish will accumulate at high miles, $15/injector to clean in ultrasonic bath), stuck intake air thermostat if non turbo (Youtube), make sure the intake air duct behind the front grid is in place, stuck engine coolant thermostat, clogged fuel filter, very worn spark plugs.

PeteB
Posts: 880
Joined: 27 May 2014
Year and Model: 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
Location: Connecticut, USA
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by PeteB »

It has a new coolant thermostat, fuel pump, timing belt that I just put on properly, and new plugs.
The old timing belt had not skipped a tooth.
I've done 3 drain and fills on the transmission, and it has never had any issues, shifts fine.
I will go over the stage 0 list, thanks for that.

I hope to get actual mileage in the next week or so since the odometer is now working.

Beyond mileage, my question is how to confirm that the ECU/engine are operating normally
even though there are no CEL codes.

Then next, if there are any mods to get a few more MPG here and there.

User avatar
RussB
Posts: 570
Joined: 15 July 2014
Year and Model: '00 S70, '04 S60
Location: connecticut
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by RussB »

Again, what MPG is the car getting?

Inflating the tires to the max is a bad idea. It gives a crazy harsh ride and lowers traction considerably.
'00 S70, '04 S60 and the never ending quest for Stage Zero

PeteB
Posts: 880
Joined: 27 May 2014
Year and Model: 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
Location: Connecticut, USA
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by PeteB »

RussB wrote: Inflating the tires to the max is a bad idea. It gives a crazy harsh ride and lowers traction considerably.
I seem to recall all the hypermiling guys suggesting it and reading this probably 20 years ago.
I don't believe it harms traction, but probably does cause slightly uneven wear.

This seems to confirm your claim, at 70 MPH at least but they also point out that the
aerodynamic drag at 70 is the dominating frictional loss so it might be around town, or
at 55 MPH (frictional losses are usually square law with speed IIRC) where you'd see the
most gain and they didn't bother to test that:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/a940/4199963/

They had tires rated for 50 psi and ran them at 45, I think that ours are rated for 42 and
he runs them at 38 which is not crazy high, much better than when they are low at 24.
On the other hand that article also states:
"What's more, we know under-inflated tires have a negative effect on fuel economy. The U.S. Department of Energy says that for every 1-psi drop in pressure, you can expect your gas mileage to lower by 0.4 percent."

Another test done under simulated city driving conditions:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.p ... 17151.html
MythBusters: Tire Pressure Test : Video : Discovery Channel
TV Review: Mythbusters 8.23 – “MiniMyth Madness” | Fandomania


Control, 35psi (manufacturer recomendation)
tyres at 10psi = 3.7% increase in consumption
tyres at 30psi = 1.2% increase in consumption
tyres at 40psi = 6.2% decrease in consumption
tyres at 60psi = 7.6% decrease in consumption

im amazed that even at 5PSI over recomended pressure there was a 6% increase!!!

test car: 2004-2007 Ford Taurus

PeteB
Posts: 880
Joined: 27 May 2014
Year and Model: 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
Location: Connecticut, USA
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by PeteB »

Stuck intake air thermostat discussion - thanks oragex:
https://www.matthewsvolvosite.com/forums ... 0&start=10

I have to check this.
Last edited by PeteB on 20 Mar 2016, 17:15, edited 1 time in total.

PeteB
Posts: 880
Joined: 27 May 2014
Year and Model: 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
Location: Connecticut, USA
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post by PeteB »

Any opinions on the TOAD diagnostic software? It uses the ELM327 cable and
includes the cable at the $127 price:
http://www.totalcardiagnostics.com/toad/

I looked carefully at Robert's videos and I think that he uses Scan Gauge. It
is standalone and small so it can be mounted in the car for permanent use:
http://www.campingworld.com/browse/skus ... gQodukUBAA

tryingbe
Posts: 1893
Joined: 18 June 2009
Year and Model: None
Location: Mesa, AZ, USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times

Post by tryingbe »

$127 can roughly buy 1270 miles of gas, assuming $2/gal and 20 mpg. Let's say the device can increase your MPG by 2% (I highly doubt it), it'll take 63,500 miles, just to break even that $127 you spent on the device.

I don't think he's going to improve his driving at all.
Are you paying for this gas? If so, stop it. If not, it's his money.
85 GLH, 367 whp
00 Insight, 72 mpg

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post