Login Register

Positive crankcase pressure

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
roy1956
Posts: 18
Joined: 21 September 2014
Year and Model: 850, 1995
Location: California

Positive crankcase pressure

Post by roy1956 »

I have a '95 850 Turbo with 312,000 that I have owned since new. I am noticing a puff of smoke in my rear view mirror when I take off after sitting at a red light for a minute or two....which is the reason for this post.
Although I recently changed the PCV/oil trap plumbing, I am not passing the rubber glove test as described by Robert on youtube. In fact, when I put a rubber glove on the oil filler, it inflates slightly. I am getting oil seepage out the weep hole between the engine and transmission. The rear main seal was changed a couple of years ago so I know it isn't that. My suspicion is that the positive crankcase pressure is forcing oil out the rear main seal and perhaps down the valve stem seals (which haven't been changed). I have checked the ports in the block where the oil trap and other fittings go into the block and there is zero carbon in the openings. Also, just to be sure, I hooked up a length of hose to each of the ports and was able to blow air through them with no problem. I am out of ideas as to why I am not getting scavenging vacuum in the crankcase. I think the positive pressure may what is causing both the oil issues. BTW, the engine recently had a compression check and all cylinders are at 95% with one at 90%. The mechanic said it is in great shape for so many miles.

Anyone out there have any thoughts or ideas on any of the above?? I would be most grateful for any feedback!! Thanks!

kahl
Posts: 943
Joined: 27 October 2012
Year and Model: 2000V70XC
Location: columbus ohio
Been thanked: 10 times

Post by kahl »

Just for giggles switch the hoses on the top of the oil trap box. Just give it a try.

tryingbe
Posts: 1893
Joined: 18 June 2009
Year and Model: None
Location: Mesa, AZ, USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times

Post by tryingbe »

I found with the older engines, even with new PCV parts, it is not enough. The stock PCV pipe from the separator to the intake is severely undersized for an older engine. Also, the hole at the heating element at the PTC valve is tiny, like smaller than 1/4 inch tiny. Both will restrict the flow of the crankcase gases.

To address those issues, here is what I do. Get the below parts.

A 3ft 5/8 oil compatible hose. Do not use silicone hose, as it will "sweat" oil. Do not use heatercore hose, it is not rated for oil, it will become soft and you'll have to replace it sooner. This is what I use. Buy 3, as it is sold by the foot.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/291442927889?_t ... EBIDX%3AIT

One 3/4 elbows from your local hardware store. (5/8 will be the wrong size!)

A 3 feet 3/16 inch or 1/4 inch vacuum hose to replace the small hose from the intake manifold to the PTC valve. I prefer silicone hose for this.

Optional, get 6 of this. I like their clamps.
https://www.ipdusa.com/products/4768/10 ... 12mm-width

Optional, wireloom to protect the hose.

Take a unibit and drill out the PTC valve holes to as big as you feel comfortable. I think I drilled mine out to about 1/2 inch.

Remove the intake manifold and replace that stock PCV hose, I cut a short hose and then use a 90 degree elbow, than a long hose to the PTC valve. Replace the vacuum hose to the intake manifold to the PTC valve with the new one. Then reinstall the intake manifold.

Image

Image

All the crankcase gas have to go thru that tiny PTC hole!!!
Image

Installed on car
Image

Image
85 GLH, 367 whp
00 Insight, 72 mpg

User avatar
Chuck W
Posts: 1310
Joined: 24 December 2014
Year and Model: 97 854 T5
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Post by Chuck W »

The wife's '97 GLT LPT is kind of same way. Did the PCV system maintenance and still have the slight bit of positive crankcase pressure. I had been thinking about getting a Mann ProVent set-up, but this looks like it'll be a good solution. :)
'97 854 T5 - Manual Swap/M4.4/COP/NA cams/P2R Brakes/16T/ chassis bracing/ XC70 nose swap
'97 855 GLT - Hers. RN swap/16T/COP/VVT/exhaust/302s/Flashed M4.4/ chassis bracing/ 2 kid seats
'78 GLE - Waiting in the wings. Future whiteblock/T5 swap.

The Others- '83 TBird turbo, '85 Mercury Marquis LTS (1 of 134), '86 LTD Wagon, '81 Granada GL, '76 Beetle, '93 F-150 I6

User avatar
ZionXIX
Posts: 1310
Joined: 11 August 2014
Year and Model: 1996 850 Turbo S/W
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 194 times

Post by ZionXIX »

tryingbe wrote: 13 Jun 2017, 06:56 I found with the older engines, even with new PCV parts, it is not enough. The stock PCV pipe from the separator to the intake is severely undersized for an older engine. Also, the hole at the heating element at the PTC valve is tiny, like smaller than 1/4 inch tiny. Both will restrict the flow of the crankcase gases.

Have you noticed a substantial change after the modifications? Im convinced that my increase in crankcase pressure is due to blowby since my PVC box was squeaky clean when I changed it last. Do you think there will be any negative side effects to this mod? like spark plug fowling from extra oil getting into the cylinders due to increased air flow? Im totally game if this works.
Scarlett: 1996 850 Turbo Wagon in Reagent Red Pearl ~210K mi
Norman: 2012 F150 XLT Crew Cab in Oxford White ~110K mi
Ember: 2005 XC90 2.5T FWD in Ruby Red Metallic ~83K mi *Newest addition to the fleet*
Ruby: 1997 850 Turbo Wagon in Reagent Red Pearl - parts car
Rose: 2020 Ram 1500 in Delmonico Red Pearl - SWMBO's Vehicle

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

Many, many people have re-plumbed their PCV system using this concept. Most of them used other (inferior) hose though, the one recommended by tryingbe is excellent. At any rate I din't see any side effects in my cars, and I don't know of any. The biggest risk is probably if the large hose kinks under the intake manifold where it makes a 90 degree bend, blocking the PCV. But with the right angle adapter (see above) that's not an issue.

Even with a squeaky clean PCV box be sure to check the drain ports behind it, into the block.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

tryingbe
Posts: 1893
Joined: 18 June 2009
Year and Model: None
Location: Mesa, AZ, USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times

Post by tryingbe »

ZionXIX wrote: 13 Jun 2017, 14:56
tryingbe wrote: 13 Jun 2017, 06:56 I found with the older engines, even with new PCV parts, it is not enough. The stock PCV pipe from the separator to the intake is severely undersized for an older engine. Also, the hole at the heating element at the PTC valve is tiny, like smaller than 1/4 inch tiny. Both will restrict the flow of the crankcase gases.

Have you noticed a substantial change after the modifications? Im convinced that my increase in crankcase pressure is due to blowby since my PVC box was squeaky clean when I changed it last. Do you think there will be any negative side effects to this mod? like spark plug fowling from extra oil getting into the cylinders due to increased air flow? Im totally game if this works.
The modification works for my car.
85 GLH, 367 whp
00 Insight, 72 mpg

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

roy1956 wrote: 12 Jun 2017, 21:36 I have a '95 850 Turbo with 312,000 that I have owned since new. I am noticing a puff of smoke in my rear view mirror when I take off after sitting at a red light for a minute or two....which is the reason for this post. ...
Oh, I missed your opening sentence: PCV issues aside, the puff of smoke is almost certainly due to worn out valve stem seals. Like 99.99% chance.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
Clemens
Posts: 1932
Joined: 3 September 2015
Year and Model: 96 855 R + 94 855 T5
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 473 times
Been thanked: 219 times

Post by Clemens »

I'd also suggest the bigger tube to the ptc nipple. I had the same issue you had after doing the pcv system the first time and after doing it again with the mod the problem was gone. Also, male sure that the top hose under the spark plug cover sits correctly, mine came off a few times due to a clamp that was too wide. That reduced the vacuum.

As for the weep hole: if the RMS was replace a few years and the pressure was too high ever since, your RMS might be leaking again. After getting good vacum try to run a bottle of ATP 205 for a few thousand miles. This has cured my leaky RMS with 200.000 miles on it completely. Just leave it in there long enough. Took like a month or so.
Summer: 1996 855 R
Winter: 1994 855 T5M
Donor: 1995 854 10V

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post