Login Register

1996 850 boost pressure into crankcase/ one way valve.

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
Sommerfeldt
Posts: 1148
Joined: 29 July 2008
Year and Model: 2018 S90 T8
Location: Oslo Area, Norway
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: 1996 850 boost pressure into crankcase/ one way valve.

Post by Sommerfeldt »

tardcart wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 15:39 I don't know why people would argue there isn't 12 pounds of boost plus blow-by at the PTC diminished only by the small hole in it and
the very slight vacuum present in the intake tube, thus pushing back into the crankcase. any thoughts or experience with a one way valve on the vacuum valve from the intake? I notice there is one on the charcoal canister line off the throttle-body tree. Im not really discussing maintenance issues, just how pressure in the crankcase can be better relieved in what seems an inadequate system under any boost, let alone increased and long duration boost.
Well, there might be 12 psi of pressure in the intake manifold, and so the small "vacuum" line from the end of the manifold to the side of the PTC will in theory see some of that... but the pressure in the manifold is handled by the engine - that's where it's supposed to go (which is also why that little line only needs a rubber elbow and not a clamp of any kind), and the volume that small line carries is pretty minuscule.

The blow-by shouldn't be more than the stock lines can handle, but the main point is that crankcase pressure won't travel back into the block, since there will be positive pressure inside the block, escaping. There won't be more pressure outside the block than inside it. With that in mind, I think a better route is to facilitate that escape. A lot of people replace the stock line to the top of the PTC with larger ID, often also coupled with a catch can (I have one on my '96). There have also been reports of people deleting the PTC all together, but enlarging the hole might also work. The PTC doesn't seem to have a severe impact on much at all, especially if you have a catch can that handles the moisture and whatnots the engine pukes out that way.

- S
2018 S90 T8 Inscription - glossy black with amber interior and dark as night rear windows.
[Gone] '96 855 T5 - R bumper and spoiler, Koni Yellows & blue H&R springs all 'round.
[Sold] '97 S70 T5
[Gone] '95 855 T5-R - one of the black ones... sadly stolen and wrecked.

User avatar
June
Posts: 2275
Joined: 4 May 2016
Year and Model: 2004 S80 T6,1991 740
Location: Arkansas
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Post by June »

Doesn't the ball in the banjo bolt prevent positive pressure from going backwards through the system? June
My Volvo cars owned
1989 740 GLT ordered
1994 850 4door standard shift ordered
1996 960 ordered
1998 S90 ordered totalled after 3 weeks
1998 V70 GT dealer stock car
2002 S80 T6 ordered totalled
2004 S80 T6 dealer stock car and current car owned

Sommerfeldt
Posts: 1148
Joined: 29 July 2008
Year and Model: 2018 S90 T8
Location: Oslo Area, Norway
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Post by Sommerfeldt »

June wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 18:10 Doesn't the ball in the banjo bolt prevent positive pressure from going backwards through the system? June
No - it’s the PCV system. No banjo bolts. :)

- S
2018 S90 T8 Inscription - glossy black with amber interior and dark as night rear windows.
[Gone] '96 855 T5 - R bumper and spoiler, Koni Yellows & blue H&R springs all 'round.
[Sold] '97 S70 T5
[Gone] '95 855 T5-R - one of the black ones... sadly stolen and wrecked.

hausmeister
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 July 2006
Year and Model: 1995 850T5-R
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Post by hausmeister »

I think you are wrong about this causing any issue with crank pressure.

But to answer your question: I installed a one way check valve in the vacuum line to the ptc. Reason for this is that I drilled the tiny hole a bit larger during the pcv renewal (also used larger hoses) and I didn't want to lose any precious boost pressure :o . The valve works fine as far as I can tell (only open during vaccum). Doesn't seem to impact pvc system.
850 T5-R '95 auto Image

Klausc
Posts: 793
Joined: 11 October 2006
Year and Model: 1995 855 Turbo
Location: Shorewood, MN
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Post by Klausc »

I don't know why I have to say this, but boost pressures the intake manifold, not the crankcase.
Klaus
If I had a larger garage, I could have more Volvos.

tardcart
Posts: 410
Joined: 8 February 2019
Year and Model: 96 850t. 93 940t
Location: Pittstown Nj
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Post by tardcart »

Hausmiester, now we are getting some where; one, and I thing two good reasons to block pressure to the PTC/crankcase. and a vote to enlarge or eliminate the PTC. I wonder if the heat function of the PTC is to prevent coagulation causing blockage or to pre-heat vaccuum
in non turbo mode? I think the whole system was designed in 93 for na cars and they never bothered to improve it for pressurized intake. Volvo maby used the money to change to five lug wheels.

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35284
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1502 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Post by abscate »

It is a good design for the turbo. My 1999 was 10% occluded after 160k miles as the car was maintained with 5000 mile oil changes. The PTC heater is to prevent the sludge from condensing in the port.

Opening up the port is fine if you can figure out the mass balance of crankcase air
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

Klausc
Posts: 793
Joined: 11 October 2006
Year and Model: 1995 855 Turbo
Location: Shorewood, MN
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Post by Klausc »

tardcart wrote: 10 Feb 2019, 17:22 I think the whole system was designed in 93 for na cars and they never bothered to improve it for pressurized intake. Volvo maby used the money to change to five lug wheels.
The NA engines do not have a PCT, the vacuum line from the #1 cylinder area goes to the PCV and the intake just before the throttle body.

That same small line is used by the turbo engines to draw air from the large line that enters the PCT, drawing crankcase vapors from the oil separator. During boost, the small line does not produce a lot of air pressure to the PCT which is already under a lot of negative pressure.

The reason for the EVAP system vacuum shutoff is so that the positive manifold pressure (during boost) does not blow out the EVAP system.
Klaus
If I had a larger garage, I could have more Volvos.

tardcart
Posts: 410
Joined: 8 February 2019
Year and Model: 96 850t. 93 940t
Location: Pittstown Nj
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Post by tardcart »

The turbo intake pipe is basically under zero negative pressure if the filter is clean. so I dont think its drawing much from the PTC. thinking it over I guess its best not to enlarge the PTC much since that would lower the vacuum to the crankcase at idle which is important for clean smells at the stoplight. I guess Ill try a one way vacuum valve from the intake manifold and scratch my head about a shunt into the turbo intake from the crank breather that is activated under boost . or maby a blow off valve set at 3 pounds. This is the major drawback that puts these cars in the junk yard; blown seals, just behind over heat issues with bad hoses and heater cores.

Sommerfeldt
Posts: 1148
Joined: 29 July 2008
Year and Model: 2018 S90 T8
Location: Oslo Area, Norway
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Post by Sommerfeldt »

tardcart wrote: 10 Feb 2019, 19:04 The turbo intake pipe is basically under zero negative pressure if the filter is clean. so I dont think its drawing much from the PTC. thinking it over I guess its best not to enlarge the PTC much since that would lower the vacuum to the crankcase at idle which is important for clean smells at the stoplight. I guess Ill try a one way vacuum valve from the intake manifold and scratch my head about a shunt into the turbo intake from the crank breather that is activated under boost . or maby a blow off valve set at 3 pounds. This is the major drawback that puts these cars in the junk yard; blown seals, just behind over heat issues with bad hoses and heater cores.
Well, there is negative pressure there - at our FI levels, there won't be much, but some. It's important to note that there is no check valve on the system from the factory, and blow off valves are not a good idea in a system which depends so heavily on MAF metering of all the air that enters it (and thus leaving it). The main problem again, as you also say, is blown seals when internal pressure climbs too high, and providing effective and adequate relief of that pressure.

Providing a larger path to the PTC and having fluids condense and collect somewhere other than the relatively small passages of the PTC and elbows there (not to mention intake manifold) is the best way to ensure that and augment the factory system - i.e. bigger hose + catch can.

- S
2018 S90 T8 Inscription - glossy black with amber interior and dark as night rear windows.
[Gone] '96 855 T5 - R bumper and spoiler, Koni Yellows & blue H&R springs all 'round.
[Sold] '97 S70 T5
[Gone] '95 855 T5-R - one of the black ones... sadly stolen and wrecked.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post