Login Register

Does rear O2 sensor change engine management?

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
alschnertz
Posts: 701
Joined: 29 April 2011
Year and Model: 1995 854T
Location: Connecticut
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Does rear O2 sensor change engine management?

Post by alschnertz »

1995 854T, 259,997 miles

I am getting a code for catalytic converter efficiency and with this mileage and it once having bad valve seals, I'm not surprised it's shot. I don't have the $$ to fix it right now and want to just limp along for another few months / couple hundred miles.

My question is, does the rear O2 sensor make changes to the timing or fuel trim if it senses a bad catalytic converter?

I think I read somewhere that just the front O2 sensor controls all the engine management and that the rear O2 sensor simply looks for a change in the exhaust gases then trip the CEL if none is detected. However, I can't seem to find any information on whether the rear O2 sensor actually controls anything.

Thanks
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.

One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
alschnertz
Posts: 701
Joined: 29 April 2011
Year and Model: 1995 854T
Location: Connecticut
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Post by alschnertz »

erikv11 wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 08:28 You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.

One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
Ok, that's good.
I wonder if I got the rear sensor out of the exhaust stream (using an anti-fouler) the CEL would go out.
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

Maybe it does not affect fuel trim on '95(M4.3 management)...but on my '97 with M4.4 it does.
Both o2 sensors are communicating with each other all the time and if rear one detects that something is wrong it will not just turn on CEL...it will also change fuel trim.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
kallekula
Posts: 1074
Joined: 2 March 2014
Year and Model: S70 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by kallekula »

alschnertz wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 11:10
erikv11 wrote: 11 Jul 2020, 08:28 You have it right, the rear O2 does not control any engine parameters.

One way to deal with this would be to delete the rear O2 in TunerPro on a tuned ECU, FWIW.
Ok, that's good.
I wonder if I got the rear sensor out of the exhaust stream (using an anti-fouler) the CEL would go out.
Yes it will but chances are smog inspection will see that and fail the car. They have mirrors they look with.

BMW 540i 2002
S70 Base 2000

User avatar
alschnertz
Posts: 701
Joined: 29 April 2011
Year and Model: 1995 854T
Location: Connecticut
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Post by alschnertz »

^ Good point. But I suppose it would fail anyway because of the bad cat.
Just trying to buy some time and eliminate the annoyance of the CEL.
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

260k, that's no slouch of a '95!

If you send me a m4.4 turbo ECU I'll flash it up for m4.4 with no rear O2 and send it back. They are cheap at junkyards. You can try out m4.4 too, it has subtle improvements. Still not free I know but still one easy way to get the light turned off. And my flashing just sits here doing nothing ...

Also keep in mind the rear O2 itself may be what's bad or there is an exhaust leak, cat could be fine.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
alschnertz
Posts: 701
Joined: 29 April 2011
Year and Model: 1995 854T
Location: Connecticut
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Post by alschnertz »

erikv11 wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 07:57260k, that's no slouch of a '95!
I'd say 260K isn't so bad either.
I swear this car has nine lives. One family owned (been a dd for 8 different family members!), has been threatened to be donated at least a half dozen times, but I can just never pull the trigger. I even posted just a few weeks ago wondering what I should pull before it goes away. Then don't you know, I have a breakdown with one of the other cars and have to pull this one from the weeds to use for the past week. Maybe I'll renew the registration in Sept. There's a ton of worn out wearable parts issues, but the sob will still just start up and go.
Photo is from 2 years ago when I was going to part it out. Still looks the same.

Thanks for the upgrade offer, but I'm fine with the way it is for now.
Attachments
RF.JPG
'60 PV544, '68 220, '70 145S, '86 745T, '95 854T, '01 S40
'84 Prelude
'06 MPV
'13 Ford Focus SE

User avatar
manovlov
Posts: 1180
Joined: 6 July 2011
Year and Model: 1995 850 GLT 2.5 170
Location: Grenoble, France
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 143 times

Post by manovlov »

the front panel is timeless...

Manov
1995/02 850 GLT 2.5 170 Petrol M56

User avatar
callahanoffroad
Posts: 437
Joined: 30 June 2014
Year and Model: 1995 850
Location: St. Louis Missouri
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post by callahanoffroad »

alschnertz wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 14:04
erikv11 wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 07:57260k, that's no slouch of a '95!
I'd say 260K isn't so bad either.
I swear this car has nine lives. One family owned (been a dd for 8 different family members!), has been threatened to be donated at least a half dozen times, but I can just never pull the trigger. I even posted just a few weeks ago wondering what I should pull before it goes away. Then don't you know, I have a breakdown with one of the other cars and have to pull this one from the weeds to use for the past week. Maybe I'll renew the registration in Sept. There's a ton of worn out wearable parts issues, but the sob will still just start up and go.
Photo is from 2 years ago when I was going to part it out. Still looks the same.

Thanks for the upgrade offer, but I'm fine with the way it is for now.
Up on the wood it looks like a Volvo statue or a trophy. I like it. :-)
Author, Chef, and Shade Tree Mechanic

1995 Volvo 850, Non-Turbo, VVIS, LH FI, Green, 215,000 miles. B5254FS engine. Herman. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=84393

1996 Volvo 850, died at 280,000

Founder of: CookingForChemo.Org

Read my Silly Comic Book at: therealpizzabros.com/

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post