Login Register

96 850 turbo shock- 9200014 for 8626030

Post Reply
whatgoeson
Posts: 18
Joined: 12 Mar 2016, 13:07
Year and Model: 1999 v70
Location: Brooklyn ny

Post by whatgoeson »

hey there-

been trying to find an answer the past few nights but can't- just acquired a 96 850 turbo wagon with a bad rear psngr shock(8626030)- and wondering if i can pull the 9200014's off the rear of my 98 xc..

sorry if this is an insane question.. obviously the ride height is different between the two vehicles.. im just trying to learn to make mid 90 volvo ownership a more sustainable move for my broke ass.

thanks

scot850
Posts: 15486
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 14:46
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 2199 times
Been thanked: 1852 times

Post by scot850 »

The 98 V70 XC probably has the self leveling AWD Nivomat. I believe the mountings are totally different for a FWD as rear suspensions are totally different.

Does your 96 have self leveling rear shocks too?

V70XC has a longer shock travel but if it fits it might work but it might screw up the self leveling height.

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

whatgoeson
Posts: 18
Joined: 12 Mar 2016, 13:07
Year and Model: 1999 v70
Location: Brooklyn ny

Post by whatgoeson »

from what i could find on a 8626030(the shock currently on my 96) search they appear to be self leveling nivomats most commonly used on 98-2010

so if they're both nivomats atleast i can expect the mounts to fit? i guess thats where i'm confused-

thanks for such a quick response neil!

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5437
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 16:09
Year and Model: 2010 Volvo S80 D5
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 432 times

Post by misha »

Ride height will be higher on the side where you would install an XC nivomat.
It will look awfull and handling would be compromised.
2010 S80 D5 / restyling / fully equipped / Twin turbo / Savile Gray Metallic (492)

History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon

whatgoeson
Posts: 18
Joined: 12 Mar 2016, 13:07
Year and Model: 1999 v70
Location: Brooklyn ny

Post by whatgoeson »

oh i would do both of course-

thanks misha!

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5437
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 16:09
Year and Model: 2010 Volvo S80 D5
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 432 times

Post by misha »

I that case...the rear end would sit a lot higher than it should...and again....handling would be compromised because the car will be diving with nose(front end) down.
2010 S80 D5 / restyling / fully equipped / Twin turbo / Savile Gray Metallic (492)

History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon

whatgoeson
Posts: 18
Joined: 12 Mar 2016, 13:07
Year and Model: 1999 v70
Location: Brooklyn ny

Post by whatgoeson »

got it- i guess i should have stated i was considering swaping all four.. but maybe that would lead to handling issues too.. sorry for my lack of knowledge here just trying to learn.

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5437
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 16:09
Year and Model: 2010 Volvo S80 D5
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 432 times

Post by misha »

Turbo cars sits lower than n/a cars and a lot lower than xc cars.
Originally...suspension is a bit stiffer on turbo cars.
If you want to be safe in regards of handling...you will need to swap the whole thing....rear XC shocks with springs and front XC shocks with springs.

If you don't mind...it will look like an XC.
2010 S80 D5 / restyling / fully equipped / Twin turbo / Savile Gray Metallic (492)

History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon

whatgoeson
Posts: 18
Joined: 12 Mar 2016, 13:07
Year and Model: 1999 v70
Location: Brooklyn ny

Post by whatgoeson »

ok thanks so much misha- i appreciate it!

scot850
Posts: 15486
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 14:46
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 2199 times
Been thanked: 1852 times

Post by scot850 »

Check the lower mounting on both Nivomats. The V/S 70 and V70 XC all have a lower mount like this on the AWD models:

https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/volvo- ... -6#fitment

See the bar at the bottom? That fits into the rear control arm on the AWD cars.

This is the FWD equivalent:

https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/volvo- ... 70-8626028

Note it does not have the bar. Now, whether you can remove the bar from the bottom of a Nivomat without damaging the bush...........

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post