Hello folks, I would need some clarification on the science/physics of torque specifications.
A. 2006 Toyota Sienna, AWD has a lug nut torque of 75 ft.lbs
B. 2001 Volvo XC70 owner's manual specifies 100 ft.lbs for lug nut.
On line specifies 105 ft.lbs, which is 5 ft.lbs more than the OEM manual.
1. Logically, 5 ft.lbs is not much of a big deal, right?
2. Why would a 2001 Volvo XC70 have a higher torque than a 2006 Toyota Sienna?
C. 2001 Volvo XC70 Vibration Damper (4 screws)
Stage 1 = 18.5 ft.lbs
Stage 2 = 30 Degrees
3. First stage means to torque to that set amount, then turn 30 Degrees.
4. If so in (#2), why isn't the "30 Degrees" calculated and included to the Stage 1 torque. In such case, there would be only one torque to say, example, instead of the specified "Stage 1 18.5 ft.lbs" it would be just one 20 ft.lbs torque?
Thanks, for I am still work in progress!
Torque Education Needed
-
Oka
- Posts: 380
- Joined: 5 March 2013
- Year and Model: XC70, 2001
- Location: Anchorage, Alaska
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Torque Education Needed
2001 Volvo XC70/AWD/Auto/Turbo/146kMiles
2001 Volvo V70XC/AWD/Auto/Turbo/144kMiles
2002 Subaru Outback L.L. Bean/3.0/131K/AWD
2005 Volvo XC90/AWD/V8/Auto 111 Miles
2006 Toyota Sienna LE/AWD 93K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1985 BMW (E23) 735i(US)/AUTO/209K Miles (Parked since 2011)
1997 Mazda MPV/AUTO/4WD/173K Miles (Parked since 2008)
2001 Volvo V70XC/AWD/Auto/Turbo/144kMiles
2002 Subaru Outback L.L. Bean/3.0/131K/AWD
2005 Volvo XC90/AWD/V8/Auto 111 Miles
2006 Toyota Sienna LE/AWD 93K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1985 BMW (E23) 735i(US)/AUTO/209K Miles (Parked since 2011)
1997 Mazda MPV/AUTO/4WD/173K Miles (Parked since 2008)
- chris11211
- Posts: 197
- Joined: 26 February 2019
- Year and Model: 2006 s60 2.5T
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
1. Lug nuts vs lug bolts. Big difference.
2. The idea is to stretch the bolts to secure better, but many mechanics just ugga dugga with their fancy impact wrench.
2. The idea is to stretch the bolts to secure better, but many mechanics just ugga dugga with their fancy impact wrench.
- jonesg
- Posts: 3501
- Joined: 16 January 2008
- Year and Model: 2004 V70
- Location: Northern maine.
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 479 times
5 ft lb isn't a lot but 5 more ft lbs is exponentially greater when its already at 100.
I hit one with the impact, check with the torque wrench and ugga dugga them all to the same amount.
I hit one with the impact, check with the torque wrench and ugga dugga them all to the same amount.
- RickHaleParker
- Posts: 7129
- Joined: 25 May 2015
- Year and Model: See Signature below.
- Location: Kansas
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 958 times
It is done this way because the point of Maximum Tensile strength is in the Plastic range.Oka wrote: ↑16 Oct 2021, 00:31
C. 2001 Volvo XC70 Vibration Damper (4 screws)
Stage 1 = 18.5 ft.lbs
Stage 2 = 30 Degrees
3. First stage means to torque to that set amount, then turn 30 Degrees.
4. If so in (#2), why isn't the "30 Degrees" calculated and included to the Stage 1 torque. In such case, there would be only one torque to say, example, instead of the specified "Stage 1 18.5 ft.lbs" it would be just one 20 ft.lbs torque?
Thanks, for I am still work in progress!
The 18.5 ft.lbs is the end of the elastic range ... The Yeild point.
30° stretches the bolt a specific length in to the plastic range to get Maximum Tensile strength.
Elastic Phase: The bolt will stretch while under torque, but returns to its original condition.
Yield Point: The point that separates the elastic phase from the plastic phase is known as the yield point.
Plastic Phase: Once a typical bolt reaches the yield point and you continue to apply torque, it enters the plastic phase. Bolt will not won’t return to its original length and condition when torque is removed.
Don't over stretch the bolt. If you do you will over shoot the Maximum Tensile strength and can stretch it to the point of failure. This is why one does not reuse the bolts. Go slow on the stretch.
You know when you entered the plastic range. The bolt will suddenly start turning easier as if the bolt turned into plastic. You have all done it at one time or another and wondered what the hell!
⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙⸙
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
1998 C70, B5234T3, 16T, AW50-42, Bosch Motronic 4.4, Special Edition package.
2003 S40, B4204T3, 14T twin scroll AW55-50/51SN, Siemens EMS 2000.
2004 S60R, B8444S TF80 AWD. Yamaha V8 conversion
2005 XC90 T6 Executive, B6294T, 4T65 AWD, Bosch Motronic 7.0.
- volvolugnut
- Posts: 6223
- Joined: 19 January 2014
- Year and Model: 2001 V70
- Location: Oklahoma USA
- Has thanked: 927 times
- Been thanked: 999 times
Thanks Rick Parker. This explanation of torque and plastic strain is from college level engineering course in Strength of Materials. Careers are built on these ideas. The concepts of bolting torque expands on elastic/plastic strain and is complicated by friction between the bolt head and clamped surface, nut and bolt thread, and the nut and clamped surface. Dirt, lubricants, imperfect machining of threads, previous damage, and any washers in the stack add other factors to the torque to obtain the desired bolt stretch. The tools to measure torque are also subject to errors. Thick books have been written about all these details.
The joint design difference (real or imagined by the designing engineer) are the likely source of the Volvo and Toyota torque specification differences.
volvolugnut
The joint design difference (real or imagined by the designing engineer) are the likely source of the Volvo and Toyota torque specification differences.
volvolugnut
The Fleet:
Volvo: 2001 V70 T5, 1986 244DL, 1983 245DL, 1975 245DL, 1959 PV544, multiple Volvo parts cars.
Mercedes: 2001 E320, 1973 280, 1974 280C, 1989 300E, 1988 300TE, 1979 300TD, parts cars.
2009 Smart Passion
Ford: 1977 F350, 1964 F150 (2), 1938 Tudor Sedan
Farmall tractors: 1956 400 Diesel, 1946 A
And others.
Volvo: 2001 V70 T5, 1986 244DL, 1983 245DL, 1975 245DL, 1959 PV544, multiple Volvo parts cars.
Mercedes: 2001 E320, 1973 280, 1974 280C, 1989 300E, 1988 300TE, 1979 300TD, parts cars.
2009 Smart Passion
Ford: 1977 F350, 1964 F150 (2), 1938 Tudor Sedan
Farmall tractors: 1956 400 Diesel, 1946 A
And others.
- volvolugnut
- Posts: 6223
- Joined: 19 January 2014
- Year and Model: 2001 V70
- Location: Oklahoma USA
- Has thanked: 927 times
- Been thanked: 999 times
That is the thing with torque specs, there is a very wide range of what will work for most cases. What will often cause a failure is the small fastener under the hand of the large installer.
volvolugnut
The Fleet:
Volvo: 2001 V70 T5, 1986 244DL, 1983 245DL, 1975 245DL, 1959 PV544, multiple Volvo parts cars.
Mercedes: 2001 E320, 1973 280, 1974 280C, 1989 300E, 1988 300TE, 1979 300TD, parts cars.
2009 Smart Passion
Ford: 1977 F350, 1964 F150 (2), 1938 Tudor Sedan
Farmall tractors: 1956 400 Diesel, 1946 A
And others.
Volvo: 2001 V70 T5, 1986 244DL, 1983 245DL, 1975 245DL, 1959 PV544, multiple Volvo parts cars.
Mercedes: 2001 E320, 1973 280, 1974 280C, 1989 300E, 1988 300TE, 1979 300TD, parts cars.
2009 Smart Passion
Ford: 1977 F350, 1964 F150 (2), 1938 Tudor Sedan
Farmall tractors: 1956 400 Diesel, 1946 A
And others.
- kallekula
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 2 March 2014
- Year and Model: S70 2000
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
I used to work for a shop where my colleague forgot to tighten the lugnuts on a customer car. Twice. He was out smoking so much so he forgot.
Thank god the customers survived and that they didn't sue. Since then I tight lugnuts probably more than they need to.
Thank god the customers survived and that they didn't sue. Since then I tight lugnuts probably more than they need to.
BMW 540i 2002
S70 Base 2000
-
TisMe
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 24 March 2019
- Year and Model: 2001 & 2004 XC70
- Location: Country Roooads
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
If you were on the east coast I'd almost assume that was my dad's one-time use tire guy, but looks like this is a countrywide misstep from too much daytime devil's lettuce.
This is logically why a lot of mechanics overtighten your lugs when you cruise in for a tire swap, as you point out. Can't blame them.

-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 5205 Views
-
Last post by RockyCasper
-
- 3 Replies
- 1381 Views
-
Last post by kosh_al






