Login Register

$10,000 S80 Challenge Topic is solved

Third generation Volvo V70 wagon and XC70, and second generation S80. Are you an owner? Prospective owner? Get in here and join us! Start a new topic or comment on an existing thread.

2008-2016 V70
2008-2016 XC70
2007-2016 S80

This topic is in the MVS Volvo Repair Database » The $10k S80 Challenge
Post Reply
User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Re: $10,000 S80 Challenge

Post by pgill »

MVS Readers,

I don't typically post more than once a day but I wanted to update you on my experience with the Nokian Tires

Its been almost two years since I purchased the tires.

But because of COVID its only been about 10,000 miles

Tires installed at about 135K miles

Here is the odometer today.
IMG_7041.JPG
And here is the

Front Left Tire
IMG_7036.JPG

Front Right Tire
IMG_7037.JPG

Back Left Tire
IMG_7040.JPG

EDIT: Here is a picture of the Back Right
IMG_7084.JPG



I haven't been rotating the tires. But looking at the pictures I should have.


The front Left and Right Rear are just below the 80% mark (in the picture you can almost see the outline for the 80)

So they are worn to 75% of their useful life.

The front right tire is taking the beating is is almost down to 60%.


I will rotate the tires in another month or two after the heavy rain.


Thanks

Paul
Last edited by pgill on 07 Nov 2021, 21:02, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

All,

I had some extra time today so I decided to rotate now.

I decided to do a counterclockwise rotation so that the RF tire wouldn't get back to it original position for 15,000 miles. (I plan to rotate every 5,000 miles)
Rotate.jpg
Rotate.jpg (21.72 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
I was a little concerned that the right front had worn faster than the rest so I checked for wear in the Tie Rod and ball Joint and found none.

The one thing that I did find is that the Worn Tire is the one that has a repair for a nail. It is possible that the wear happened due to a slight under inflation due to a very slow leak. If the tire that I rotated to the right front position doesn't show any abnormal wear I will ignore the fact that the damaged and repaired tire wore out faster then the rest.

I do really like the fact that the wear indicator on the Nokian Tires makes is so easy to see what is happening.

Thanks

Paul

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

MVS Readers,

The tire that I rotated from back right to front right still has the 80% wear indicator slightly visible.

Picture was taken at night with a flash (iPhone 6 if that matters to you)


IMG_7084.JPG


The visible 80% mark is very useful to see if the Front Right position is rapidly wearing out tires or if the rapid wear was due to the puncture suffered by the tire that was there before I rotated.

Because the 80% is so faint any excessive wear should be easy to detect in a week or two.

Note: when the tire were new they had a 100% that was also very faint ant it disappeared very quickly.


Just in case this is unclear to anyone the wear indicators are molded at different depths and as the tire gets to the bottom of that number the marking disappears.

Continental does something very similar but they use Dry, Wet and Snow

The Nokian Z line A/S are a really nice tire
(I am very particular about my tires and I will admit that I am not easy to impress when it comes to tires)

Having said that when the Z-line A/S wear out I will be getting another set (assuming that I still own the S80)

Take care

Paul

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35294
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1504 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Post by abscate »

In the Civil war era it was considered bad practice to change sides of radial tires, even if they were bi-directional, has that changed?

I hate when society changes stuff, the other day I saw someone carrying a phone that worked without cords

In my state 25% of tread depth is considered end of life. That would give you 30,000 mike service life on your S80, about right for a big luxurious battleship
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

ABSCATE,

You are making a fair point.

When rotating Tires some people recommend that the tires stay on the same side of the car so that the rotational direction isn't changed.

Having said that it is common to see rotation patterns that do swap the side of the vehicle and hence the rotation direction.

If modern radial tires were likely to fail by changing direction of rotation then the manufacturers would not show rotations that allow for a change in direction.


I've been rotating my tires this way for years with no negative effects.


But if someone reading this has any concern then they should rotate front to back and keep the tires on the same side.


Good question

Thanks

Paul

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

MVS Readers,

I experienced my next failure on the S80 (well actually my son experienced it I just fixed it)

A broken Brake Light Bulb.

IMG_7106.JPG
Trust me it is broken (I know that it is difficult to see in the picture)


IMG_7108.JPG
These are the bulbs that the Auto Parts counter person directed me to.
(Note: the bulb that came out had a different number but the parts store didn't have that number so I used these.)

IMG_7109.JPG
The entire bulb holder assembly come out as a single unit. If you look carefully you will see the latchets that must be depressed (look at the center line of the holder)

IMG_7112.JPG
I did disconnect this Grey connector but in retrospect I'm not sure that thus is necessary.


The observant reader will notice that the bulb came in a two pack. However at this time I only replaced one of the bulbs. If you feel that I should have replaced both I will accept the critique.

Take care

Paul

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

An update on my Front right suspension.

The Tire on my front right was wearing out faster than the other three tires

There are two reasonable explanations for this

1. Excessively Worn: Bushings, Bearing, Ball Joint, Tire Rod, Strut

2. Low tire pressure due to a puncture

I rotate a different tire to the front right to determine if the answer is #1 or #2

Its been a few weeks and about 400 miles

Here is the picture of the Tire at the right front now
IMG_7115.JPG

The wear is hardly noticeable which indicates that #1 is very unlikely

Conclusion the root cause is #2


I also measured the Tread depth of the tire
IMG_7118.JPG
When new the tire is specified as having 10/32's

Looking at the picture it shows 9/32's

Depending on where you live a worn out tire is either 2/32's or 1/32's


If we assume that the use able range is 10/32 - 2/32 = 8/32


Then my Tire is worn by 1 out of these 8 or 1/8 = 12.5%

100% - 12.5 % = 87.5% (which is over 80% and reasonably close to 80%)


I really like the wear indicator.

Thanks

Paul

User avatar
pgill
Posts: 799
Joined: 27 August 2018
Year and Model: 2010 S80, 2008 LR2
Location: California
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Post by pgill »

MVS Readers,

I determined that my brake light bulb is actually a

P21W

The marking on the bulb had a four digit number and the P21W

I incorrectly assumed that the four digit number was what I needed but I was wrong.


I did find a website that has this information

Bonus point if you can guess the URL

https://www.matthewsvolvosite.com/forum ... hp?t=61483

The good news is now I know that I used the correct replacement bulb.

Have a happy Thanksgiving

Paul

User avatar
volvolugnut
Posts: 6233
Joined: 19 January 2014
Year and Model: 2001 V70
Location: Oklahoma USA
Has thanked: 927 times
Been thanked: 1000 times

Post by volvolugnut »

I my state, all too often, a tire is considered worn if the cord is showing more than 1/4 the way around. Really, I see this a lot. Avoid Oklahoma in your travels.
volvolugnut
The Fleet:
Volvo: 2001 V70 T5, 1986 244DL, 1983 245DL, 1975 245DL, 1959 PV544, multiple Volvo parts cars.
Mercedes: 2001 E320, 1973 280, 1974 280C, 1989 300E, 1988 300TE, 1979 300TD, parts cars.
2009 Smart Passion
Ford: 1977 F350, 1964 F150 (2), 1938 Tudor Sedan
Farmall tractors: 1956 400 Diesel, 1946 A
And others.

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35294
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1504 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Post by abscate »

my state, all too often, a tire is considered worn if the cord is showing more than 1/4 the way around.
You can show fabric cords but metal cords showing will get you a warning to “ get that fixed , son”
Attachments
3027BAA1-DB14-4910-8436-7F50B2111BF0.jpeg
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post