Login Register

Manual vs auto fuel economy

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
SomeGuy537
Posts: 65
Joined: 18 November 2020
Year and Model: 1997 BMW 528i
Location: Mariehamn
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Manual vs auto fuel economy

Post by SomeGuy537 »

Hello people! I'm considering buying an 850 with a manual trans in hopes of getting better gas mileage. I have a VW Golf right now (which i'm not terribly happy with). I was forced to sell my lovely well equipped 850 GLT auto because of the dreadful fuel economy which was around 19-22 mpg combined. Now i'm curious about what numbers you guys are getting. Please specify what type of driving you do aswell as what engine you have too. In my experience older cars are a great deal more economical with manual transmissions than autos so it would be interesting to see how big the difference are when it comes to 850's.

User avatar
Clemens  
Posts: 1932
Joined: 3 September 2015
Year and Model: 96 855 R + 94 855 T5
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 473 times
Been thanked: 219 times

Post by Clemens »

My 850 10V with AT used around 10 Litres/ 100km, my 96 R (AT) and 94 T5 (Manual) use about 11-12 Litres/100 km quite equally, depending on the amount of city and freeway driving. The difference here is mainly my gas input. The 10V with AT was the most economic of the three, because it was lacking 100hp.
Summer: 1996 855 R
Winter: 1994 855 T5M
Donor: 1995 854 10V

scot850  
Posts: 14899
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1853 times
Been thanked: 1714 times

Post by scot850 »

What gallon are you using? UK or US (4.5l or 3.8l for the gallon calculation).

When I had a 850 AT (1993 GLT with the 20V engine) with some city driving and country driving it would regularly give 28 mpg (UK). On a run outside the city it would go into the mid 30's on the Highway (UK gallon).

My 98 V70XC AWD AT with a 4 speed auto would get up to 38-40 mpg (UK) on the highway but mid 20's in town.

My 2000 V70 NA with the 5 speed auto my buddy bought from me he has seen 7-7.5l/100km on a highway run but 10-11/100km around town.

My 2000 V70R (5 speed auto) is dreadful, but rarely gets a decent run other than around town. On a good day maybe 20mpg (UK) and on the highway 28 mpg (UK).

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

User avatar
FireFox31
Posts: 1635
Joined: 14 August 2006
Year and Model: 2000 V70 NA auto
Location: New Hampshire
Has thanked: 158 times
Been thanked: 300 times

Post by FireFox31 »

I owned a 2000 V70 NA manual for 18 years and now have owned a 2000 V70 NA automatic for the past year. In 2016-2017, my manual got 26.0 mpg city / 27.1 mpg highway, typically carrying me and 50 lbs, with maybe 245-270k miles. In 2021, my automatic got 22.4 mpg city / 24.9 mpg highway, typically carrying me and 350 lbs, with 205-215k miles. These are calculated from gas receipts averaging summer and winter gas, using US gallons.

Maintenance of the car may help improve fuel economy. Stuck airbox flap, dragging parking brake shoes, worn spark plugs, and many other things can eat away at mpg. I've been working to get my automatic to stage zero, though have yet to see a drastic improvement in mpg from any one maintenance I've completed. My manual was not in impeccable condition, but I think the automatic must have some problem which the manual didn't.

Weight you're carrying will also affect fuel economy. Because I'm rehabilitating my automatic at a local shared-access garage, I've been hauling around all of my tools and many parts all year. That's why I noted the estimated carrying weights above.

Ultimately, get a manual. They're way more fun. And do everything you can to bring its maintenance to as-new, stage zero condition so you get the best mileage.
FireFox31
Blue 2000 V70 NA manual, "the V70" - died, reborn, totaled, donated, stripped
Green 2000 V70 NA automatic, "the G70" - awaiting 2nd rehab
Black 2000 V70 NA automatic, "Geronimo" - rescued, rehabilitating
Blue 1998 V70 T5 manual, "the T5M" - awaiting rehab

hausmeister
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 July 2006
Year and Model: 1995 850T5-R
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Post by hausmeister »

Check https://www.spritmonitor.de/en/ for lots of different datapoints.
But, I don't think you will be able to drive an 850 below 9.5 to 10L /100km realistically. That is about what my 10v manual s70 used and it was always well maintained. For my T5-R AT it's about 11.5L - when you consider it has about double the hp I'd say it is way more efficient.
The lowest I ever managed on the s70 was ~7L when going consistent ~100kmh over very long distances.

When fuel efficiency is a priority, I'd not get any 5 cylinder volvo, except maybe a diesel.
Last edited by hausmeister on 02 Feb 2022, 05:24, edited 1 time in total.
850 T5-R '95 auto Image

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35311
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3822 times

Post by abscate »

Our 1999 NAs will get 30 mpg or about 8 liters per 100km on Highway at 110kmh/ 62 mph

On the Highway , if you keep the converter locked up with a light foot you should even do better with an automatic..I think the final drive is lower? Unlocked, economy will suffer of course
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
befarrer
Posts: 204
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 1998 V70 AWD
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 24 times

Post by befarrer »

I'm lucky if I see under 10L/100Km on the highway, but I have a LPT, auto, and AWD.
98 V70 GLT AWD
05 VW Golf TDI
93 Mazda B2200 with 13B rotary engine swap

shegarty
Posts: 302
Joined: 12 September 2011
Year and Model: 1998
Location: port hope
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by shegarty »

abscate wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 05:23 Our 1999 NAs will get 30 mpg or about 8 liters per 100km on Highway at 110kmh/ 62 mph
+1 on this - my 98 S70 T5 averages 8.2-8.5 l/100km in warmer weather and just over 9l/100km in winter (and that is here in Canada with extreme temps and snow covered roads). Keep them well tuned and with a light foot they get pretty good gas mileage.
98 S70 T5 SE 298k km (daily)
87 740T sedan (current project)
previous - 90 745T; 94 855 T5

hausmeister
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 July 2006
Year and Model: 1995 850T5-R
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Post by hausmeister »

+1 on this - my 98 S70 T5 averages 8.2-8.5 l/100km in warmer weather and just over 9l/100km in winter
Depends on driving conditions, if you really have long distances where you can drive consistent speeds then the fuel economy is ok.
I am used to comparing a whole tank fillup for fuel usage.
850 T5-R '95 auto Image

User avatar
befarrer
Posts: 204
Joined: 11 November 2019
Year and Model: 1998 V70 AWD
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 24 times

Post by befarrer »

I find anything that causes boost, your fuel mileage drops. I get much worse city driving than highway, from accelerating. I also pulled a 6' x 6' trailer with a snowmobile 300km on the highway, I got 14l/100 km, the extra drag killed my fuel mileage.
98 V70 GLT AWD
05 VW Golf TDI
93 Mazda B2200 with 13B rotary engine swap

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post