Login Register

07' XC90 front strut bolts...

A mid-size luxury crossover SUV, the Volvo XC90 made its debut in 2002 at the Detroit Motor Show. Recognized for its safety, practicality, and comfort, the XC90 is a popular vehicle around the world. The XC90 proved to be very popular, and very good for Volvo's sales numbers, since its introduction in model year 2003 (North America). P2 platform.
Post Reply
jerryv
Posts: 31
Joined: 31 December 2019
Year and Model: 2007 XC90 3.2
Location: Somewheres
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 3 times

07' XC90 front strut bolts...

Post by jerryv »

Im trying to replace the TTY bolts on my XC90s front struts. I ordered new nuts and bolts via FCP Euro (via their part finder) but they lack a non-threaded protrusion which makes their overall length a bit shorter than OEM (see pic).

Image

Looks like the threaded portion is the same/close and I could potentially loose the washers to gain a few more threads. I talked to FCP on the horn and they said the two are compatible but that I ordered the wrong nuts (I have nut 985932 and should have gotten 987938...and they dont have those)

The FCP part is "Volvo Strut Mount Flange Screw - Genuine Volvo 982869" which supersedes 966363 (Im assuming this is the longer bolt?)

Chassis number (last 6 of VIN) is 364938

I found this related MVS post that is focused on the nuts...implying I can use the 985932s I got?

viewtopic.php?t=89039

...Lastly can anyone confirm the correct spec for these is 77ft lb + 75 degrees?

Thank wisdom/info on this appreciated

Thanks!!

User avatar
ggleavitt
Posts: 742
Joined: 4 June 2006
Year and Model: 06,08 XC90 V8
Location: Camano
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Post by ggleavitt »

I think that the longer non threaded part is just to make putting the nut on easier. Torque specs as attached.
XC90 Front End TorqueSpec.pdf
(15.27 KiB) Downloaded 238 times
I've use both type nuts and bolts interchangeably, whatever I had at the time. I added to that thread some years ago noting that I didn't think there was a difference, here are my current vehicles-

06, I'll guess I re-used the bolt when I swapped the struts in 2021:
XC90_06Strut.JPG
XC90_06Strut.JPG (88.59 KiB) Viewed 1840 times
08, this is what I had from my reseller (have another set in my parts box):
XC90_08Strut.JPG
XC90_08Strut.JPG (170.85 KiB) Viewed 1840 times
2006 V8 Ocean Race #740/800 200k, 2008 V8 Sport 183k

jerryv
Posts: 31
Joined: 31 December 2019
Year and Model: 2007 XC90 3.2
Location: Somewheres
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by jerryv »

I went ahead and used the FCP parts I had. Everything fits together nicely with a healthy amount of thread protruding. Heres a pic for future people.

TTY assemblies are stretched to the edge of failure and should never be reused, especially somewhere as important as a strut...and especially on a Volvo! 8)
Attachments
IMG_6041.jpg
IMG_6041.jpg (107.3 KiB) Viewed 1814 times

User avatar
ggleavitt
Posts: 742
Joined: 4 June 2006
Year and Model: 06,08 XC90 V8
Location: Camano
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Post by ggleavitt »

Helpful photo, this is exactly what it should look like with the newer bolt and the one-piece nut.

Thanks for posting.
2006 V8 Ocean Race #740/800 200k, 2008 V8 Sport 183k

SOURDOUGHJIM
Posts: 136
Joined: 14 May 2023
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.4
Location: Missouri
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Post by SOURDOUGHJIM »

Specialty Products Company lists the 81260 to replace the upper bolt if camber adjustment is needed.
https://www.spcalignment.com/component/ ... m&to=USATo

cn90
Posts: 8256
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Post by cn90 »

I am not convinced this bolt is TTY.

I (and shops, dealer mechanics) re-use this bolt many times, zero issues.
The fact that a bolt is turned to a certain angle does not mean it's TTY bolt.
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

chitownV
Posts: 296
Joined: 17 May 2020
Year and Model: 2008 XC90 3.2
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Post by chitownV »

Yeah, the protrusion is a locating part of the bolt, but is not needed. The bolt looks good, but I don't like the nut. It doesn't have the built-in washer that helps get proper torque values. I am still on my original bolts/nuts and would have continued to use the same Volvo nut.
2008 XC90 3.2 AWD - 169k miles, Premium, Versatility 7 passenger, Climate, Convenience, retrofit Morimoto D2S HID bi-xenon, iPd swaybars & poly bushing inserts, Powerflex poly control arm bushings, Bilstein Touring Fr struts, Continental CrossContact LX25 255/55R18, Fr Infinity tweeters & speakers, hardwired cheap $17 Bluetooth to center console aux & pwr, CQuartz UK 3.0 ceramic coated, no oil consumption using Mobil 1 0W-40 even w/ my lead foot

jerryv
Posts: 31
Joined: 31 December 2019
Year and Model: 2007 XC90 3.2
Location: Somewheres
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by jerryv »

Volvo sez replace em, strut-to-knuckle connections are commonly TTY, and the 77ft lb + 75 degree spec is gettin' into the yield ballpark.

Is there any evidence or documentation that these are TTA and not TTY assemblies or are we going on feelings and anecdote?

Anecdotally, I reused my original strut bolts for 1000mi without incident. Perhaps they would have been fine for the rest of my vehicles life....or perhaps in a year or two I would become one those sorry souls hopelessly stuck with a horizontal wheel 2/3 of the way up dingo piss creek because I hit a big bump and didnt want to spend $50 on overpriced OEM hardware.

In my case, knowing without a doubt that my shiz is within spec and never needing to think about it again is easily worth the extra expense!

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5273
Joined: 15 January 2012
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Post by MoVolvos »

.
To be honest, in most cases regardless of parts being replaced the OE nuts and bolts seem to be of higher quality. Have always reused those bolt. Mechanics I've seen and worked with just impact those on and no torque wrench ever. Seen some FCP videos where I thought they should use a torque wrench but didn't. My Service Manager at Acura would say of many things "have you ever seen those fail" :lol:. If my memory serves me right, at the time he already had 25 years of wrenching experience.
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

jerryv
Posts: 31
Joined: 31 December 2019
Year and Model: 2007 XC90 3.2
Location: Somewheres
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by jerryv »

They're commonly reused for sure and even if they are TTY its possible the remaining baked-in safety margins of the system is sufficient to prevent failure and last forever anyway. Maybe not. We dont know. I typically reuse fasteners but this is too critical of an assembly to roll the dice on over saving $50.

This year I have personally witnessed three instances of passenger vehicles with horizontal front wheels, hopelessly stuck in intersections and parking lots presumably from acute strut knuckle connection failure. It aint pretty, even at low speeds.

Do it right and it wont happen to you. Simple as that.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post