Login Register

Volvo PCV Banjo Bolt With Integrated Check Valve

Post Reply
User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5279
Joined: 15 Jan 2012, 18:47
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 312 times
Been thanked: 525 times

Post by MoVolvos »

.
Is this new designed PCV Banjo Bolt a must replacement per video? My PCV system is working fine but don't know if PO had this replaced already.
.
Volvo PCV Banjo Bolt - Genuine Volvo 31325709
S60, S80, V70, XC70, XC90
w/integrated check valve
.
OE check valve damaged cylinder head valves.
.
https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/volvo- ... vo-8653884
.

.
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

User avatar
02V70
Posts: 358
Joined: 15 Dec 2021, 21:06
Year and Model: 2002 V70XC
Location: California
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Post by 02V70 »

I think it is relatively unlikely that it fails, but if it does it wreaks havoc. I'll probably replace it when I do my PCV system. I read somewhere that there are two banjo bolts, but I'm not sure if that is correct.
2002 v70 X/C 288k miles

User avatar
firstv70volvo
Posts: 575
Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 08:37
Year and Model: V70 T5 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Post by firstv70volvo »

02V70 wrote: 22 Dec 2023, 22:48 I think it is relatively unlikely that it fails, but if it does it wreaks havoc. I'll probably replace it when I do my PCV system. I read somewhere that there are two banjo bolts, but I'm not sure if that is correct.

There was one banjo bolt version that sometimes had a problem with retaining the integrated check valve in the bolt and if it escaped it gets sucked into the engine, not good. The later revision has a better pin retaining design, it's this one...
https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/volvo- ... vo-8653884

If the head of the bolt is stamped with 2014 it's the better design and I've read there are banjo bolts with a later year stamp on them.
My 2001 didn't even have a check valve in it so I updated it with the later version bolt.
There's also a banjo bolt for the coolant flow on the other end of the main PCV hose assembly, I don't know the part number but this bolt has a larger opening for water flow and no valve, I don't know if it even fits on the intake manifold side but I don't think it would be a good idea to use this bolt on the intake manifold.

User avatar
MoVolvos
Posts: 5279
Joined: 15 Jan 2012, 18:47
Year and Model: S&V70XC,S60,C30,XC90
Location: NC
Has thanked: 312 times
Been thanked: 525 times

Post by MoVolvos »

.
There was some good information in the "Similar Topics" link below.
.
viewtopic.php?p=576165&hilit=%E2%80%9Cb ... 9D#p576165
.
Blessings,

BKM


2008 C30 T5 2.0 M66
2007 S60 2.5T - New Project
2003 S80 T6 Transmission DIED
2000 S70 SE Base - New Project
1998 S70 T5 Prior
1989 240 Wagon Prior

petrikah
Posts: 3
Joined: 12 Sep 2019, 19:50
Year and Model: 2002 V70 non-turbo
Location: Michigan

Post by petrikah »

I'm replacing a PCV system on a 2002 Volvo T5.
My car has currently the PCV banjo bolt style without any check valve.

Does anyone know if there's any benefit in fitting the new style PCV banjo bolt with a check valve?

vtl
Posts: 4926
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 13:35
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 686 times

Post by vtl »

Yes. Turbo engine does not have vacuum in intake manifold under boost. Check valve restricts pressure from entering the PCV system, which helps tremendously the other half of PCV, which already struggles to draw sufficient vacuum via the long heated pipe going around the block to turbo's intake.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post