Login Register

XC90 years/types to avoid?

A mid-size luxury crossover SUV, the Volvo XC90 made its debut in 2002 at the Detroit Motor Show. Recognized for its safety, practicality, and comfort, the XC90 is a popular vehicle around the world. The XC90 proved to be very popular, and very good for Volvo's sales numbers, since its introduction in model year 2003 (North America). P2 platform.
Post Reply
jbrew
Posts: 1
Joined: 10 October 2009
Year and Model: 2001 V70
Location: Tennessee

XC90 years/types to avoid?

Post by jbrew »

Getting ready to purchase my 7th volvo - branching out from my wagon to an XC90 and wondering if there are any particular years or engine types I should avoid? Thanks!

meine39
Posts: 147
Joined: 25 July 2007
Year and Model: 1995 850 GLT Wagon
Location: Philly Burbs

Post by meine39 »

Consumer's lists the 6 cylinder XC90 on their 'Worst of the Worst' Used Cars to Avoid List, which they define as 'multiple model years with much worse than average reliability ratings'. Looks like black marks center around transmission and 'drive system' (presumably the all wheel drive hardware).
1995 855 GLT 190K NA Auto
1998 BMW 528im 137K
2000 Toyota Camry 78K
2010 GMC Acadia 57K

OEMVolvoParts
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 August 2009
Year and Model: ALL
Location: CA

Post by OEMVolvoParts »

The 2003-2006 XC90 T6 is the one you want to stay away from. Any XC90 with the 5 cylinder is very good, whether it be a 2wd or awd. The 2007- XC90's with the 3.2 has been fine, no real problems yet. All the V8's have also been very strong.

Overall the biggest complaint is the brakes, they wear out fairly quickly.

Red October
Posts: 2
Joined: 21 September 2009
Year and Model: 2001 s40
Location:

Post by Red October »

Thanks, I was going to post this very question. My wife has her eye on an '06 2.5, and I am going to try to talk her into the '07 3.2... Plus, I just want the extra power..

OEMVolvoParts
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 August 2009
Year and Model: ALL
Location: CA

Post by OEMVolvoParts »

If I was given a choice between the 3.2 and the 2.5t, I would take the turbo. In my opinion the 2.5t is going to feel stronger because of the extra low-end torque. It is also a very proven engine and trans combo. The condition of the vehicle plays a large role as well, but you know what your gonna get with the tried and true setup. Bigger engine does not always mean more power, especially when the smaller motor has a turbo. (They are both very nice cars :lol: )

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post