Login Register

1998 S70 GLT TURBO questions

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: 1998 S70 GLT TURBO questions

Post by jblackburn »

That lower intercooler hose (directly from the turbo) gets squishy with oil with age. That means it's prone to blowing off and leaving the car power-less in the middle of the road.

If they're squishy or oil-coated, they're a candidate for replacement. Also, too much oil in the hoses means that your car needs a PCV job - badly.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

cn90
Posts: 8258
Joined: 31 March 2010
Year and Model: 2004 V70 2.5T
Location: Omaha NE
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Post by cn90 »

jblackburn wrote:That lower intercooler hose (directly from the turbo) gets squishy with oil with age. That means it's prone to blowing off and leaving the car power-less in the middle of the road.

If they're squishy or oil-coated, they're a candidate for replacement. Also, too much oil in the hoses means that your car needs a PCV job - badly.
As far as I can tell, that hose is slightly coated with oil but seems OK, still soft and pliable.
I will clean it up and watch for oil leak.

I just verified the PCV system, it is still factory at 145K!!!
The elbow hose (from the PCV Trap to the top of the engine) is rock hard!
PCV refresh is on the list but it is too cold now, 32F today.
Maybe in the Spring of 2013 when the birds migrate back here.
2004 V70 2.5T 100K+
2005 XC90 2.5T 110K+

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1962
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

rspi wrote:
rmmagow wrote:Can't run regular gas though, 89 or higher only. I'm actually looking for an N/A (not too too seriously, but....) with the thoughts of better economy via regular fuel, but for what it's worth, any Volvo white motor, blasted or regular seem to run forever with proper care.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the NA cars have higher compression ratio and are suppose to use 91+ octane. Your GLT should run fine on 87+ octane, however you are suppose to run 91+ in that car as well. Our car runs strong in heat or colder weather. You may want to check that out. Plugs, wires, etc.
Congrats on your purchase! I hope you enjoy it.

I just wanted to share some slightly different experience as far as types of gasoline.

I've owned my 97' 850 GLT (same engine as 98' S70 GLT) for over 10 years now and it ran just fine on regular gas all this time. Every now and then I experimented with higher grades but to me they made no difference performance or mileage wise exept cost more. The car now has more that 232 k on it and runs as strong as ever. In fact, it blows me away how powerful it is still at this age.
My "new" V70XC has vitually the same engine and therefore gets the same type of gas. And again, I don't see any reason to spend money on higher grades if I don't feel any improvement.

Dirk
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

850 LPT wrote:
rspi wrote:
rmmagow wrote:Can't run regular gas though, 89 or higher only. I'm actually looking for an N/A (not too too seriously, but....) with the thoughts of better economy via regular fuel, but for what it's worth, any Volvo white motor, blasted or regular seem to run forever with proper care.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the NA cars have higher compression ratio and are suppose to use 91+ octane. Your GLT should run fine on 87+ octane, however you are suppose to run 91+ in that car as well. Our car runs strong in heat or colder weather. You may want to check that out. Plugs, wires, etc.
Congrats on your purchase! I hope you enjoy it.

I just wanted to share some slightly different experience as far as types of gasoline.

I've owned my 97' 850 GLT (same engine as 98' S70 GLT) for over 10 years now and it ran just fine on regular gas all this time. Every now and then I experimented with higher grades but to me they made no difference performance or mileage wise exept cost more. The car now has more that 232 k on it and runs as strong as ever. In fact, it blows me away how powerful it is still at this age.
My "new" V70XC has vitually the same engine and therefore gets the same type of gas. And again, I don't see any reason to spend money on higher grades if I don't feel any improvement.

Dirk
I guarantee you it's pulling timing somewhere along the way. Try a tank of 89-93 in one of them, and then reset the engine computer by pulling off the negative battery cable.

Both of my turbo cars run terrible on 87 octane.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1962
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

Sorry for the dumb question, but what do you mean by "pulling timing"?

I'm pretty sure I'm not getting codes in either of my cars from this, could you tell me what to look for? I'm kind of curious now.
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

When the knock sensor detects knock (these days, it can hear things you can't - not like with older cars), it retards timing a bit to prevent pre-ignition as much as the car can. This results in a bit of wasted fuel and power.

Here's a graph of the Cruze pulling timing going up a hill in 5th gear (~2000 RPM) running 87 octane. You can feel the car "pulsing" along with the corresponding peaks in the graph as it cuts power in and out going up the hill. They say it can run "fine" on 87 octane, but that's just not true.
30sec.png
30sec.png (452.15 KiB) Viewed 1078 times
I've noticed on the T5 motor, running 87, it is INCREDIBLY slow during the summer below 2500 RPM. Hit the gas hard, and you can just feel the engine bogging down; and it feels a bit weaker throughout the whole rev range and slower to respond than it is on 89 or 93. The T5 motor is already slow before the turbo picks up, so that doesn't help much. I usually ran 89 in the S70 unless it was 90+ F outside.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
850 LPT
Posts: 1962
Joined: 27 May 2011
Year and Model: 96' 850
Location: CT
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Post by 850 LPT »

Thanks for explaining this in so much detail, it does make a lot of sense now. What I think is happening is that the effect of this is far less noticable (if at all, since I never did) in an LPT car vs. an HPT or NA.
This is just my theory, but maybe the LPT is simply masking the negative effect by providing so much low end power. But it would probably still make sense to upgrade to higher grade fuel. :shock:
98' S70, base, 5-speed manual, pewter/ tan, 145k miles
99' S70, base, 5-speed manual, nautic blue/ tan, 225k miles, currently inop
06' V70, auto, willow green/ charcoal, 147k miles
79' Ford Capri S, Euro Spec 2.8 V6, T9 5-speed manual, owned since 1986
58' Porsche Diesel Junior
13' Honda Odyssey :oops:
84' Mercedes 300 D, gold/ tan, 420k miles (retirement project :D )

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post