So while working on my cylinder head, I noticed that while it was normal to have carbon buildup on the exhaust ports, all my valves are covered in a flaky layer of carbon, while the exhaust valves are covered in a white layer.
While I did have a bad headgasket, antifreeze shouldn't have entered the other combustion chambers which had 200 psi compression, so pretty much perfect condition.
This means the bi-fuel e.g CNG must have been dirty and caused all this crap, but the carbon buildup also says something else.
Reasons for this carbon buildup?
-
scot850
- Posts: 14864
- Joined: 5 April 2010
- Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Has thanked: 1834 times
- Been thanked: 1709 times
It could just be oil leaking past the valve stem seals. The inlet valves don't tend to get as hot so it may mean it carbonizes rather than burns off. Exhaust valves are hotter so it may burn off more. Spark plug I can see looks normal.
We don't have CNG over here in regular cars so I don't know what is normal.
Neil.
We don't have CNG over here in regular cars so I don't know what is normal.
Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold
- erikv11
- Posts: 11800
- Joined: 25 July 2009
- Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
- Location: Iowa
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
Volvo branded only on the valve stem seals. Buy them in the bulk pack, not individually.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k
-
vtl
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 16 August 2012
- Year and Model: 2005 XC70
- Location: Boston
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
Degrease the valve steams thoroughly. They should be super dry, or the new seals will pop off. Don't glue them, like some folks do - most of glues become soft once heated and act like a grease.
-
dikidera
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 15 August 2022
- Year and Model: S60 2005
- Location: Galaxy far far away
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 175 times
Could this also be why I had 200+ psi on the cylinders and even 210 on cyl 5 where I shouldn't have had the headgasket affect them? Which would mean I may find lower compression in those after replacing the valve stem seals, as the oil does help seal the combustion chamber better?
It's a NA engine, so I actually expected at the time to have this high of a compression if the cylinders were not worn and there were no other issues. Even in the cylinders with the bad head gasket, I got at least 160 to 180 psi.
It's a NA engine, so I actually expected at the time to have this high of a compression if the cylinders were not worn and there were no other issues. Even in the cylinders with the bad head gasket, I got at least 160 to 180 psi.
-
dikidera
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 15 August 2022
- Year and Model: S60 2005
- Location: Galaxy far far away
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 175 times
So what is the actual compression in a normal Volvo 5 cylinder NA? Like I said, I believed 200+ psi to be correct as well as the tool itself.
For a turbo engine it should be of course lower. In any case, I didn't see anything about PSI numbers in VIDA. And what I did find is that if for a T5 with a static CR of 8.5:1, 160-180 psi is good, then for a 10.3:1 static CR, 200 psi seems pretty in the ballpark of what is normal.
I always do a compression test with WOT(if it's even possible with the ETM).
For a turbo engine it should be of course lower. In any case, I didn't see anything about PSI numbers in VIDA. And what I did find is that if for a T5 with a static CR of 8.5:1, 160-180 psi is good, then for a 10.3:1 static CR, 200 psi seems pretty in the ballpark of what is normal.
I always do a compression test with WOT(if it's even possible with the ETM).
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post






