Login Register

Reasons for this carbon buildup?

Help, Advice, Owners' Discussion and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's stylish, distinctive P2 platform cars sold as model years 2001-2007 (North American market year designations).

2001 - 2007 V70
2001 - 2004 V70 XC (Cross Country)
2004 - 2007 XC70 (Cross Country)
2001 - 2009 S60
2003 - 2007 S60 R
2004 - 2007 V70 R

Post Reply
dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Reasons for this carbon buildup?

Post by dikidera »

So while working on my cylinder head, I noticed that while it was normal to have carbon buildup on the exhaust ports, all my valves are covered in a flaky layer of carbon, while the exhaust valves are covered in a white layer.

While I did have a bad headgasket, antifreeze shouldn't have entered the other combustion chambers which had 200 psi compression, so pretty much perfect condition.
This means the bi-fuel e.g CNG must have been dirty and caused all this crap, but the carbon buildup also says something else.
20230423_143643.jpg
20230423_143643.jpg (417.01 KiB) Viewed 694 times
20230423_143633.jpg
20230423_143633.jpg (449.02 KiB) Viewed 694 times

scot850
Posts: 14864
Joined: 5 April 2010
Year and Model: 2000 V70 R
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Has thanked: 1834 times
Been thanked: 1709 times

Post by scot850 »

It could just be oil leaking past the valve stem seals. The inlet valves don't tend to get as hot so it may mean it carbonizes rather than burns off. Exhaust valves are hotter so it may burn off more. Spark plug I can see looks normal.

We don't have CNG over here in regular cars so I don't know what is normal.

Neil.
2006 V70 2.5T AWD Polestar tune
2000 V70 R - still being an endless PITA
2006 XC70 - Our son now has this and still parked in our garage
2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited
2015 Kia Sportage EX-L - Sold
1993 850 GLT -Sold
1998 V70 XC - Sold
1997 Volvo 850 SE NA - Went to niece in California - Sold
2000 V70 SE NA - Sold

vtl
Posts: 4723
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 603 times

Post by vtl »

This is leaky valve stem seals.

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

Volvo branded only on the valve stem seals. Buy them in the bulk pack, not individually.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

vtl
Posts: 4723
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 603 times

Post by vtl »

Degrease the valve steams thoroughly. They should be super dry, or the new seals will pop off. Don't glue them, like some folks do - most of glues become soft once heated and act like a grease.

dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Post by dikidera »

Could this also be why I had 200+ psi on the cylinders and even 210 on cyl 5 where I shouldn't have had the headgasket affect them? Which would mean I may find lower compression in those after replacing the valve stem seals, as the oil does help seal the combustion chamber better?

It's a NA engine, so I actually expected at the time to have this high of a compression if the cylinders were not worn and there were no other issues. Even in the cylinders with the bad head gasket, I got at least 160 to 180 psi.

vtl
Posts: 4723
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 603 times

Post by vtl »

No. I think your measurements are wrong. My compression was spot on with a good brand gauge, even with more severe carbon and calcium buildup than yours.

dikidera
Posts: 1304
Joined: 15 August 2022
Year and Model: S60 2005
Location: Galaxy far far away
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Post by dikidera »

So what is the actual compression in a normal Volvo 5 cylinder NA? Like I said, I believed 200+ psi to be correct as well as the tool itself.

For a turbo engine it should be of course lower. In any case, I didn't see anything about PSI numbers in VIDA. And what I did find is that if for a T5 with a static CR of 8.5:1, 160-180 psi is good, then for a 10.3:1 static CR, 200 psi seems pretty in the ballpark of what is normal.

I always do a compression test with WOT(if it's even possible with the ETM).

vtl
Posts: 4723
Joined: 16 August 2012
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 603 times

Post by vtl »

Actually, I converted it wrong. 1.3-1.5 MPa is a good range for N/A engine, which translates to ~190-215 PSI.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post